• The TOC
  • SOFREP Explained
  • The Loadout Room
  • Team Room
SOFREP.com - THE Special Operations Forces Report
SOFREP Logos AFSOC MARSOC NSWC USASOC
  • News & Intel
    • SOF News
    • Op-Ed
    • AFSOC
    • MARSOC
    • NSWC
    • USASOC
    • Coalition SOF
    • SOF History
    • Special Operations
    • Black Ops & Intel
    • Admin
    • No Kidding There I Was
  • About Spec Ops
    • AFSOC
    • MARSOC
    • NSWC
    • USASOC
    • Coalition SOF
  • SOFREP TV
    • Inside the Team Room: U.S. Army Rangers
    • Heroes of U.S. Special Operations
    • Inside the Team Room: U.S. Navy SEALs
  • SOFREP Radio
  • Charities
  • Comms Check
    • Share Your War Stories
    • SOFREP Explained
  • The PX
Home Previous story Next story
submit to reddit
Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Youtube
Home » SOF News » The Challenges of Women in Combat Roles

The Challenges of Women in Combat Roles

by Brandon Webb · January 23, 2013 · Posted In: SOF News, Special Operations
idf-female-sofrep
From The NY Times

Related Posts
  • The Inconvenient Truth About Women and Combat (Part 1)
  • Women in The Navy SEAL Teams: Admiral (SEAL) Olson Comments…
  • An Inconvenient Truth About Women in Combat (Part 2)

WASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta is lifting the military’s official ban on women in combat, which will open up hundreds of thousands of additional front-line jobs to them, senior defense officials said Wednesday.

he groundbreaking decision overturns a 1994 Pentagon rule that restricts women from artillery, armor, infantry and other such combat roles, even though in reality women have frequently found themselves in combat in Iraq and Afghanistan, where more than 20,000 have served. As of last year, more than 800 women had been wounded in the two wars and more than 130 had died.

Defense officials offered few details about Mr. Panetta’s decision but described it as the beginning of a process to allow the branches of the military to put the change into effect. Defense officials said Mr. Panetta had made the decision on the recommendation of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

Women have long chafed under the combat restrictions and have increasingly pressured the Pentagon to catch up with the reality on the battlefield. The move comes as Mr. Panetta is about to step down from his post and would leave him with a major legacy after only 18 months in the job.

The Challenges of Women in Combat Roles

We’ve done several pieces on woman in combat roles, the problem isn’t about, can women do the job, it lies in how to best go about the transition. The military has a poor track record for implementing changes when it comes to women. Usually standards are lowered to plus up numbers, and morale goes to hell because of it. This is true on both sides, women also want to earn it and be respected for it, when they’re greased through it endangers lives and creates unit tension. I saw this first hand when the Navy started integrating females into pilot roles. It was clear that women were getting third and fourth tries in flight school when men would wash out for less.

girls-of-the-idf-sofrep

Israeli females are required to serve in the IDF, and many in combat roles.  

For me it’s not about whether women can do the job, plenty can, it’s how the DOD goes about it. Another big issue that needs to be addressed is male/female integration. It’s against human nature to put men and women in close quarters with the stress of war and expect them not to have sex. If anyone has served overseas you know what I’m talking about, and what a Kandahar 10 is.

A solution is all female units, several countries, including South Korea, have successfully adopted these programs.

South Korea-spec-ops-women-sofrep

South Korean Female SOF. Watch your eyes gents…

For now we’ll have to wait and see what comes down the DOD pipe, and if standards will be adjusted off the books.

Female Navy SEALs? Maybe…

About Our Links
We link to other websites if we find their content compelling. We also link to relevant products on Amazon.com as affiliates. The money we earn from these sales helps keep our website running and a few beers on ice.

About The Author

Brandon Webb

Brandon Webb is a former U.S. Navy SEAL with combat deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, and elsewhere in the Middle East. His last tour in the SEAL Teams was as the Course Manager for the US Navy SEAL Sniper program, arguably one of the most difficult sniper courses in the world. He was formerly a contributing editor for Military.com, and currently the Editor-in-Chief of SOFREP.com. Brandon is regularly featured in the media as a subject matter expert on military affairs. An avid writer, his last two books (The Red Circle, & Benghazi: The Definitive Report) both hit the New York Times best seller list, and his writing has been featured in print, and digital media worldwide. You can follow him on Twitter @BrandontWebb

Related Posts

  • The Inconvenient Truth About Women and Combat

    The Inconvenient Truth About Women and Combat (Part 1)

  • women-seal-SOFREP-blondie Debbie Harry terrorist squatting holdinga gun in studio with blue seamless NEW YORK CITY, 1977

    Women in The Navy SEAL Teams: Admiral (SEAL) Olson Comments…

  • Marine patrols in southern Afghanistan's Helmand province

    An Inconvenient Truth About Women in Combat (Part 2)

Follow Sofrep on:
Follow @sofrep OR  rss
1656 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
Priest_B
Priest_B 5pts

What is a Kandahar 10?

carrissima
carrissima 5pts

Some women are  manly  to say the least and if they wish to be in combat then all the more power to them. However, I wonder if there is going to be a rise in rape accusations if they are in such close quarters because it can turn into a lot of he said she said? I still beleive that women and men are not created equal and men are the stronger sex. I think honestly a female Navy Seal will weaken the team. I don't mind living in a man's world, as long as I can be a woman in it.”  ―    Marilyn Monroe,   

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Getting kinda sick of the feminists talking this issue up as a matter of equality.  It's bullshit.  Women aren't required to register under the selective service system which means military service and a combat MOS are "electives" for them.  That ain't equality folks. Not in fact or under the law.  It's selective inequality.  If I were in Congress I'd be pushing to change the law and make ALL females eligible for the draft just like men are.  How do you like your equal treatment now ladies?

StormR
StormR 5pts

 @SEAN SPOONTS  Speaking just as one lady, I'd be fine with it, Sean.  Women are not less patrotric nor have a less a sense of duty to their country than men do.  And having lived through the last draft, I can assure you that not ALL men were particularly happy about it.  Clearly equal opportunity means equal responsibility.  This one is a non-gender issue.  I can understand you are cranky, but suggesting that women wouldn't serve their country is a stretch.

 

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts

@StormR Well, I don't think its a stretch to notice that the advocacy for women serving in the military at first and serving in combat units later never included the call for women to receive equal treatment when it comes to eligibility for the selective service. This is because the feminists knew there would be a quick backlash. Women serving in the military or in combat units does not make them equal to men from a gender equality standpoint. Equal eligibility for selective service would.

StormR
StormR 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @SEAN SPOONTS  @StormR  Look, I understand how cranky you are about this issue, and I agree with you fully that for solid reasons there are jobs in the military that women should not do - both for physical and operational issues.  But is not about women being equal to men, this was about women have the same opportunities as men.   Women ARE equal to men - we are not less than, and I think you would go off the hook if someone suggested to the female members of your family that they weren't quite as good as men.  Women ARE different than men in several ways.  But different does not equate to less than except in specific circumstances.  You cannot physically carry a child or give birth, but that does not make you less a parent, just the different parent.  But you and your wife would equally BE parents.   It isn't a feminist argument - it's the age old argument that one human being is not less than another.   Different does not mean the 'whole' is less than.  

EmilioLizardo
EmilioLizardo 5pts

Will they be required to cut their hair like men too?

 

Will the men who stay home take the place of baby maker when the girls die?

Nowerrant
Nowerrant 5pts

 @EmilioLizardo You could always get a test tube replacement!!

nousdefiones_jp
nousdefiones_jp 5pts

After they lower the standards for all combat roles including SOF Im going down to Bragg to the first class that graduates a chick from the Q course. Im going to pick out the first one I see wearing a Green Beret and Im going to level her! One of two things will happen:

A.) She will lay down and cry like the little girl she is or,

B) She will get up and throw me the worst @$$ beating Ive ever had.

This will be a litmus test to see what the standard has become because I can assure you the gentlemen I served with that had that fuzzy piece of green on their heads would go for option B all day.  If they want to be warfighters then they better start acting like them!

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

The question that keeps coming to mind for me on this subject it this.  For all the billions were are going to spend now and in the future integrating women into combat jobs what are they bringing to the fight that is an improvement over what we have now?

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @SEAN SPOONTS  I try to explain that to my wife and she doesn't get it.

 

The truth is no one cares about the cost in time, effort, troops, money to change the pipelines to accomidate women (let alons justify why a certaing standards, task mission is critical to a unit.  I'm glad I'm not in.  What a goat rope!  

 

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 6 Like

 @majrod Well, we care and that ought to be the question we keep asking until the proponents of this bad policy have a answer for it that goes beyond the feminist agit prop about gender equality.  We aren't the most feared and respected military force in the world because of our committment to diversity and gender equality.  Right now the Left is framing the argument and gaming the issue with distractions. I had a proponent of this issue ask me why I didn't care about female equality.  My reply was that I care so much that I'm willing to recognize the inherent inequalities where life and death for both men and women are concerned.  This is going to get men and women killed(and disabled) and they will just be chalked up as sacrifices on the alter of gender equality.  Their lives don't really mean anything to these people, they just exist to serve the cause.

EmilioLizardo
EmilioLizardo 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @SEAN SPOONTS  @majrod 

Oddly, when it comes to things like VAWA, women are defined as natural born victims.  Real studies show that women overwhelmingly initiate domestic violence but suffer overwhelmingly the consequences.  I.e, they aren't cut out for battle.   What Feminists are promoting is convenient equalities.

Txazz
Txazz 5pts

 @SEAN SPOONTS  @majrod "BTW, what is the end result of educating the public if this mandate not going to be changed."

 

My frustrated question from yesterday - thanks Sean, you answered it, because we care - because we care enough.

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @SEAN SPOONTS  Well said and I agree.

 

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Good articles on SWJ

 

This one is by the activists (lesson here is see how they treat counterarguments in comments section)

 

http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/dod%E2%80%99s-combat-exclusion-policies-limit-commanders-and-strain-our-current-forces

 

This is Dr. Creveld stating the obvious

 

http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/to-wreck-a-military

Tango9
Tango9 moderator 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod Man you and the boys did a great job over there.  Swanson got her panties all in a knot without addressing any of your points.  Not that I'm surprised.

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @Tango9  Just to place credit where credit is due I don't think I commented much in that thread at all.  There were a heck of a lot of very thoughtful posts over there. 

 

I daresay that SWJ is more professional than SOFREP and is tightly moderated.  It's a good source of information and intellectual stimulation but they don't have the fun and comraderie you see on SOFREP.   

 

Tango9
Tango9 moderator 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @majrod I've posted there once or twice buy my military experience is very very narrowly focused so I do my best to not comment about things of which I know zero.

majrod
majrod 5pts

 @Tango9  Totally predictable yet we still are speeding to oblivion.

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @ACB aka ACS She had it coming for playing "gotcha".  I told Prof Browne that he should have use the verbiage justifying stopping totalitarianism in Europe and likened it to the reasoning many say we used to go into Iraq.

 

  @Tango9

 

ACB aka ACS
ACB aka ACS 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod  @Tango9 LMAO Browne said "...something caused that pregnancy, and my guess is it was sex", I love smart ass comments like that. I don't think O'Brien appreciated it though, she didn't seem to like him very much after that.  

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @Tango9  Check out how Soledad  O'Brien tricks Prof Kingsley

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSQlOe73uY8&feature=youtu.be

 

This is the crap the left pulls.

 

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @majrod Wow, that is a very long article and the comments are as well.  I will have to hit the end of it again later as I only read a few of the comments.  Comment sections are a treasure trove of info after an article.

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod Am reading the comments again and woweee they should all be reprinted for all to read.  That one, In the Know tells it how it is in the field and he asks the same question I just did (about end result).  Excellent.

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @Txazz  If you REALLY want to read the seminal argument against all this insanity read "Co-ed Combat: The New Evidence That Women Shouldn't Fight the Nation's Wars" by Kingsley Browne. 

 

http://www.amazon.com/Co-ed-Combat-Evidence-Shouldnt-Nations/dp/B001G7R9EG

 

It is the seminal work on the issue from the con perspective.  I correspond with Prof Browne quite a bit.  Anything you can find like his numerous articles and interviews are chock full of facts.  The man is a lawyer and approaches the issue from a jurist standpoint building a factual case to make his point.  It drives the left nuts.

 

Tango9
Tango9 moderator 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

 @majrod  @Txazz And if Swanson can't take the stress of replying to cogent arguments on her own article,  (I quote):

 

"you know what is very sad to me is that for years now i thought that i was working with military men who thought that i was worth listening to at times. until we wrote this article i had no idea that women were so devalued by this group."

 

She's gonna have a great fucking time at FOB Nowhere for 12 months with 3d Plt, XX BCT.

 

 

Eric_Strattoniii
Eric_Strattoniii 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

@majrod @Txazz I use his book all the time, great source!

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod  @jackmurphy lol yes I see you already did - I think I need an afternoon cuppa coffee.

Txazz
Txazz 5pts

 @majrod  @jackmurphy You might suggest that to Quin or BW for a radio show.

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Brandon, @jackmurphy 

 

 Prof Browne would be a great subject to interview...

 

 @Txazz

 

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod Yes, Maj, I'll do that.  BTW, what is the end result of educating the public if this mandate not going to be changed.  Very frustrating as this president has weakened our nation, our economy, our foreign policy (danger danger) and now our armed forces.

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 5 Like

Heard an ironic point on the radio. 

 

Obama said he'd be leery of letting his son play football...

 

But he doesn't have a problem putting women closer to combat?

 

The logic of the left is incredible.

oldSquid
oldSquid 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

MAjRod, on the left, there is no logic... on f-e-e-l-i-n-g-s, nothing more than f-e-e-l-i-n-g-s (old Neil Diamond(?) song? or some such, maybe from "Love Story theme song?

oldSquid
oldSquid 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

spellcheck... should read ONLY f-e-e-l-i-n-g-s....

TKW406
TKW406 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

This probably isn't new info for you guys but it certainly applies to this conversation:  http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/25/gen-dempsey-hints-bar-likely-lowered-female-combat/

 

 @majrod What is your opinion of Gen. Dempsey?

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

  @TKW406  I served with Gen Dempsey when he was a LTC commanding a tank battalion.  I was the Infantry Co attached to his BN and went through a CTC (Combat Training Center) rotation with (short of combat this is the next best thing).  I knew him pretty well for the year I served in that capacity.  He rated me ahead of all his Tank company commanders but behind his HQ and Engineer company commanders.  I'd rate him as the 2-3rd best BN Cdr I served with out of the six or so BN Cdrs I had in my career.

 

Nice guy, great sense of humor.  He listened (not a common quality) when I explained I couldn't dismount TOWs off of Bradleys for dismounted ops and that I could infiltrate my infantry squad's into the enemy's positions and establish antiarmor ambushes but six squads isn't much and it would strip half my company of radios so Bradleys would be using flags to communicate with each other.

 

He could be hard if the situation demanded.  I had a weak radio watch in my company.  Privates kept falling asleep on radio watch.  My NCOs didn't want to put NCOs on the job.  I explained that Dempsey was on the verge of writing me a letter of reprimand (career ender).  "We got it Sir, won't happen again."  I told them, "OK, but I'm putting my career in your hands".  That night I just happened to wake up when BN was calling, the PFC had fallen asleep.  I woke up the NCOIC told him what happened and went back to sleep (I was getting 2-4 hours a night).  Didn't have any more problems.

 

Dempsey struck me as a smart guy but he didn't like conflict.  There was an incident where my company was attacked by a reinforced enemy armor BN.  The OPFOR was

trying to work their way through a minefield one of my platoons was watching which was key to my sector’s defense.  Long story short all my guys “died” because the BN fire support officer (FSO) instead of firing the artillery available tried to mass more artillery on the target as we identified more units attacking us.  So first it was, “we have an enemy platoon in the minefield we need arty on target alpha, down 10% strength”, five minutes would elapse, “We have TWO platoons in the minefield, WHERE’s the Arty! Down 30%!” then after ten minutes “WE’RE GETTING OVERRUN, WHERE ARE YOU?  WE’RE AT HALF STRENGTH!”.  There were no more calls, they all died.  At the after action review when I found out what happened and why the support was delayed I went ballistic.  Nose to nose with the FSO (this is a story in of itself and I’m cutting a lot out of here for bervity) if you know what I mean.  Dempsey had to break it up.  Later he wrote in a nice way that, "Will (my first name) sometimes thought he knew better than the BN".

 

Then there was another instance where I discovered my parent BN commander had lied to me and the BDE commander had abdicated his responsibilities on evaluating officers effectively ending the careers of a couple without realizing it because of an administrative error.  I asked him what to do and he gave me some advice. He could have taken some action but that would have left him very vulnerable.  I don’t blame him for not getting involved and didn’t go to him to get him involved.  It wasn’t his fight but he didn’t weigh in.

 

I was expecting more spine from Dempsey as CJCS.  I saw how he handled the OPSEC.Org incident and scratched my head.  He has been silent on Benghazi while standing behind the SecDef.  His comments on the combat exclusion policy are stunning.  I’m not happy but he’s also facing a big budget cut (that he also stays silent on) and I’m not sure what other issues he’s dealing with.  I sent him an e-mail when he got selected, he never wrote me back (again, he’s a busy guy and I’m a peon so it’s not like I expected him to but he’s got to remember me). 

 

So frankly, it’s hard to judge what’s going on and what Dempsey is doing.  As for me, I’m highly concerned.  I’m not ready to say he’s whipped but I won’t argue with someone that says he is.   

 

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @majrod  @TKW406 Will (and yes, I knew that), it really is good to hear some of these good things about Gen Dempsey.  So often the only glimpse we have is the 'finished product' and what I saw in this Benghazi did not look well as Dempsey was doing nothing except backing a lie (allegedly).  Panetta suddenly is speaking for everyone and line up or get lined out.  Yes, I understand how all that goes down and that what makes it sad.  There are times it takes more of a man to stand and stay the course (for good reason).  I can see Dempsey not wanting to throw his long career aside for what is 'normal course' at those heights.  Sad, isn't it.

And, as you stated, career enders (by accident) due to error.  I did not get along too well with the Army regimentation.  A lot of 'suck it up'.

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

 @TKW406  Nah, It's appropriate just a navy term.  I'm a treasure chest of useless military trivia so I know but the average Joe won't.

 

TKW406
TKW406 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod I knew I'd fuck it up!  Anyway, thanks for the added info!

 

*Gotta leave it up there and take my lumps.  

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @TKW406  It's a Navy term

 

TKW406
TKW406 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod Shit, I don't even know if  "BZ" fits there.  Just thought I'd try it.  :)

 

TKW406
TKW406 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @majrod Thanks for taking the time on that Major.  Also:  BZ for the added descriptors on some of the military talk, i.e "CTC (Combat Training Center)".  Those of us who are non-mil certainly don't expect it but it's greatly appreciated.

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @TKW406  @majrod Dempsey?  whipped and has been for a long time.  After all, isn't he the only one left, the one not let go.  What does that tell you.  He's wasting his breath opening his mouth.

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod Great big BELLY LAUGH on that one.  :/

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

 @majrod just read this lil blurb - cannot believe that mouth

In a sycophantic interview with The New Republic, conducted by former campaign staffer Chris Hughes and leftist writer Franklin Foer, President Obama suggested that he had all the answers to the pressing issues facing America and therefore no compromise was necessary with Republicans. He added that Republicans should compromise. And if those Republicans don’t compromise, Obama suggested that the fault would lie at the feet of Fox News and Rush Limbaugh – and that the calculus had to be changed to force Fox News and Limbaugh to stop holding Republicans accountable to conservatism.

oldSquid
oldSquid 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

 @Txazz  @majrod "President Obama suggested that he had all the answers to the pressing issues facing America and therefore no compromise was necessary with Republicans.

The epitome of arrogance - and sounds kinda like Castro used to  - and Chavez , in the recent past... I'm thinking he has assumed room temp, but nobody's talking... wonder when obama is going to change his title from "President" to "El Presidente"...

majrod
majrod 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

Check out the picture and headline on drudge.  Hilarious!

 

http://www.drudgereport.com/

Txazz
Txazz 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @majrod Yes Yes, I saw the 'shooter' pic and am still laughing.  He worded his interview very carefully and never actually said he, said we, his guests went shooting at Camp David.

Contagio
Contagio 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

This is an article written by David Horowitz in 1992 during the so-called "tail-hook scandal".  Gives quite the perspective in my opinion:  http://frontpagemag.com/2013/david-horowitz/the-feminist-assault-on-the-military/

LauraKinCA
LauraKinCA 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @Contagio

 Thanks for that one!! This is exactly what we were talking about the other day as a resurgance of feminists trying to destroy the military from within ... one of the statements in that article.

shagstar
shagstar 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @Contagio 

my brother was caught up in the middle of that Tail-Hook fiasco,,he was one of the lucky ones that didn't get railroaded in that bullshit!  it was a major wake-up call for all of the Navy/Marine aviators but,,he still has some great pic's of that party to end all parties

Contagio
Contagio 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

 @shagstar That same tactic has been used by the "social engineers" for a long time.  Unfortunate, that most folks don't pay enough attention to see it. 

shagstar
shagstar 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @Contagio 

yep,,when he stopped drinking the kool-aid he became their worst enemy!

Contagio
Contagio 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 3 Like

 @shagstar One of the reasons that I like Horowitz and his folks, is the fact that he knows the Left like the back of his hand....he was a big part of it back in the day and saw the hypocrisy of it all.  He was one of the founding members of the New Left.

Join the SOFREP Team Room, Support Our Veteran Writing Team
  • Hot Now

    • A Team Effort - Part 1

      A Team Effort - Part 1

      May 19, 2013
    • And The Hits Just Keep On Comin'

      And The Hits Just Keep On Comin

      May 20, 2013
    • musharraf_SOFREP

      Is Pakistan Heading Towards a Cliff?

      May 20, 2013
  • Latest SOFREP

    • musharraf_SOFREP

      Is Pakistan Heading Towards a Cliff?

      May 20, 2013, No Comments
    • And The Hits Just Keep On Comin'

      And The Hits Just Keep On Comin

      May 20, 2013, 6 Comments
    • A Team Effort - Part 1

      A Team Effort – Part 1

      May 19, 2013, 21 Comments
    • In the IDF, 'Lonely Soldier' is a term that describes soldiers serving on active duty who have no family is Israel. These are volunteers that came to serve for 3-5 years. They typically go back to their respective countries upon completion. Most commonly, these are people who immigrated to Israel by themselves. I was one of them. While in Israel, I lived in an apartment building where the majority of people were lonely soldiers. It was located on the outer ring of Jerusalem, surrounded by four Arab villages. My roommates were two recon guys (like me) and one who worked in field intel. All of the other inhabitants were soldiers from various units, with most of them serving a combat role. It was a well known thing, especially to the Arabs in the village. Most of the time we wouldn't be there, but when we were on leave, we would come to the apartment for a little R&R. It was rare that the four of us were there at the same time, but once in a blue moon, it did happen. Each village had, as is customary, its own mosque. When the time for prayer came, the loudspeakers would call out to the faithful. It was OK, we were used to it. However, over the weekend they would make it a point to play the call to prayer very, and I mean VERY, loud. They knew soldiers would be in the building trying to get some sleep - recovering from several weeks in the field. This always annoyed me but there was nothing I could do. On this particular weekend, after an intense seven weeks of non-stop ops, all I wanted was to go to the apartment, sleep, eat, sleep some more and then sleep again. That weekend the four of us were at the apartment and we were all equally tired. We arrived Thursday night and after a small dinner and some beers, we went to sleep. At 0400 we all jumped.... The freaking loudspeakers at all four mosques began their call to prayer at full blast. Fuck.... We spent the remainder of the day trying to rest and every time we would fall asleep, again... The call for prayers, full blast! Over lunch, we all looked at each other and knew this had to stop. We came up with a plan. I know it wasn't nice, but at that point we couldn't care less about political correctness. Here's what we did. After some recon that night, we noticed that the call to prayer wasn't performed by an Imam or some other person with a microphone. It was a tape recorder that used a tape. We figured the four of us, experts in stealthy infils, could sneak in and steal those tapes. However, while we were planning the different infil routes for each village, we all smiled and did something better. We recorded Metallica's 'For Whom the Bell Tolls' on repeat on all four tapes and then waited till midnight. At midnight, each one of us - armed with a Metallica tape - headed to a different village. All dressed in black, we were careful not to be seen. We entered into the buildings and exchanged the tapes. We rallied back to the exfil point, a crossroad not far from the last village and headed back to our apartment. And then we waited... At 0350 we went to the roof with some coffee, opened some field chairs and waited for the show to begin. At 0400 sharp the first "call" came alive, full volume: Make his fight On the hill in the early day Constant chill deep inside ... Take a look To the sky Just before you die It's the last time he will Followed by the next, then the 3rd and 4th joined in. Full volume Metallica! Soon after, we heard sirens headed to the villages. I don't know what happened after that, but we had our own private concert, right there. No kidding, there I was... Metallica call to prayer

      No Kidding There I Was… Metallica Call to Prayer

      May 18, 2013, 45 Comments
    • 345

      Battlefield America: Literary Reflux in 500 Words or Less, #2

      May 17, 2013, 91 Comments
    • north-korea-missiles_opt

      North Korea: Missile Systems

      May 16, 2013, 23 Comments
    • tripoli-embassy-usa-sofrep

      State Department’s ATA Program—A Disaster in the Making

      May 15, 2013, 25 Comments
    • What’s Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      What’s Been ‘Camouflaged’ About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      May 14, 2013, 252 Comments
    • Hoorah! Marine Torturing/Murdering Terrorist Killed!

      Hoorah! Marine Torturing/Murdering Terrorist Killed!

      May 13, 2013, 74 Comments
    • Larry Thorne: Three Wars Under Three Flags

      Larry Thorne: Three Wars Under Three Flags

      May 12, 2013, 37 Comments
  • Most Commented

    • Not Mirandizing Terrorists? Slippery slope...

      Not Mirandizing Terrorists? Slippery slope...

      April 25, 2013, 544 Comments
    • Analyzing the Chechen Connection to the Boston Marathon

      The Brothers Kavkaz: Analyzing the Chechen Connection to the Boston Marathon

      April 21, 2013, 447 Comments
    • Extortion 17 Heroes

      Extortion 17 Heroes

      May 9, 2013, 370 Comments
    • What’s Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      What's Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      May 14, 2013, 252 Comments
    • Benghazi: Book Delves Into the Details Nobody's Talking About

      UT Report: Benghazi Book Uncovers the Details Nobody's Talking About

      May 7, 2013, 245 Comments
    • Attention Whores and Conspiracy Theorists (But I Repeat Myself)

      Attention Whores and Conspiracy Theorists (But I Repeat Myself)

      April 27, 2013, 238 Comments
    • State Department at Fault Over Benghazi Response

      State Department at Fault Over Benghazi Response

      May 2, 2013, 229 Comments
    • DSC_4902

      Why Does PETA Want to Kill Our Special Operators?

      April 29, 2013, 188 Comments
    • SOFREP on Newsmax TV Discussing Benghazi

      SOFREP on Newsmax TV Discussing Benghazi

      May 8, 2013, 157 Comments
    • red dawn

      Battlefield America: Literary Reflux in 500 Words or Less

      April 30, 2013, 136 Comments
  • Topics by Category

    • SOF News

    • Op-Ed

    • MARSOC

    • NSWC

    • USASOC

    • Coalition SOF

    • SOF History

    • Special Operations

    • Black Ops & Intel

    • Admin

    • No Shit There I Was

  • SOFREP TV

    • US Army Rangers Episode 3: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 3: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      May 15, 2013, 17 Comments
    • U.S. Army Rangers Episode 2: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 2: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      May 13, 2013, 41 Comments
    • U.S. Army Rangers Episode 1: Why the Rangers?

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 1: Why the Rangers?

      May 13, 2013, 16 Comments
    • Honoring the Fallen

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: Honoring the Fallen

      December 9, 2012, 4 Comments
    • The Unifying Issue

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: The Unifying Issue

      December 8, 2012, 3 Comments
    • Veterans Day

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: Veterans Day

      December 7, 2012, 2 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 26: Passing the Gut Check

      Inside the Team Room Episode 26: Passing the Gut Check

      November 19, 2012, 7 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 25: SEALs vs. Gangsters

      Inside the Team Room Episode 25: SEALs vs. Gangsters

      November 18, 2012, 16 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 24: Leaving the Teams

      Inside the Team Room Episode 24: Leaving the Teams

      November 17, 2012, 4 Comments
  • SOFREP Radio

    • And The Hits Just Keep On Comin'

      And The Hits Just Keep On Comin

      May 20, 2013, 6 Comments
    • Navy SEAL Mike Ritland And Dog Rico Tour New York

      Navy SEAL Mike Ritland And Dog Rico Tour New York

      May 10, 2013, 18 Comments
    • Mark Donald - SEAL Medic And Author Of Book Battle Ready

      Mark Donald – SEAL Medic And Author Of Book Battle Ready

      April 28, 2013, 10 Comments
SOFREP Network SOFREP Network SOFREP Navy SEALs The Loadout Room Hot Extract The Arms Guide SOFREP Radio SOFREP TV SOFREP Team Room
Listen to SOFREP Radio #1 on iTunes
  • Contact
  • About
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Commenting
  • Advertisers

© Copyright 2013 SOFREP Inc. All Rights Reserved.