Carl von Clausewitz defined war as: An act of violence intended to compel our opponent to fulfill our will. He goes on to say, “Violence, that is to say, physical force (for there is no moral force without the conception of States and Law), is therefore the means; the compulsory submission of the enemy to our will is the ultimate object.” Most telling for the purpose of this essay, he goes on to point out that, “…for in such dangerous things as War, the errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence are the worst.”
The United States, and the West as a whole, finds itself in an age where the “errors which proceed from a spirit of benevolence” have overtaken every facet of our warfighting capability. Commanders are not making battlefield decisions based on combat necessity, they are making them based on the instructions of lawyers who endeavor to make war more ‘humane.’
or Log In
I'm glad you wrote this article. There are so many violations of war fundamentals that fighting a war, by not fighting a 'war,' has become the norm. How many objectives have lost because of restrictive ROE? Incalculable.
YankeePapa Yes that is a good book. I have not read it, but It was referenced by a a writer who submitted an article to Strategy and Tactics" So I guess I got the Cliff Notes version. I will definitely read it.
055 PeteN careful pete. UAH tag on 055.
PeteN Email sent -- "I'm in".
PeteN Livefyre screwed it all up when I got the email message, so you should have it now. Thanks!