• The TOC
  • SOFREP Explained
  • The Loadout Room
  • Team Room
SOFREP.com - THE Special Operations Forces Report
SOFREP Logos AFSOC MARSOC NSWC USASOC
  • News & Intel
    • SOF News
    • Op-Ed
    • AFSOC
    • MARSOC
    • NSWC
    • USASOC
    • Coalition SOF
    • SOF History
    • Special Operations
    • Black Ops & Intel
    • Admin
    • No Kidding There I Was
  • About Spec Ops
    • AFSOC
    • MARSOC
    • NSWC
    • USASOC
    • Coalition SOF
  • SOFREP TV
    • Inside the Team Room: U.S. Army Rangers
    • Heroes of U.S. Special Operations
    • Inside the Team Room: U.S. Navy SEALs
  • SOFREP Radio
  • Charities
  • Comms Check
    • Share Your War Stories
    • SOFREP Explained
  • The PX
Home Previous story Next story
submit to reddit
Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Youtube
Home » Black Ops & Intel » The Assassination of a Hamas Commander: Covert? Clandestine? Answers…

The Assassination of a Hamas Commander: Covert? Clandestine? Answers…

by Escape the Wolf · February 19, 2012 · Posted In: Black Ops & Intel
SOFREP_escapethewolf
This is a continuation from my previous post regarding the assassination perspective that the media didn’t report.

Related Posts
  • Assassination of a Hamas Commander: What The Media Didn’t Report…
  • North Korean Assassination Kit Explained
  • Hamas Covert Communication Techniques Exposed

A Quick Review!

The Mossad’s Mission

Covertly and clandestinely locate and kill Mahmoud al-Mabhouh – a known Hamas Commander and Arms Dealer – and make it look like a heart attack. Was this the first attempt on his life? No, the Mossad attempted to kill him on 3 other occasions.

Snapshot of the Assassination

A team of males and females arrived in Dubai, in alias, some arrived as couples, but most arrived as individuals. They set up surveillance at the airport and waited for the target to arrive. He was identified without pause by the team, then a “discreet/not to lose” surveillance was conducted to his hotel.

Once at the hotel, the team determined his room with more intrusive surveillance techniques without compromise. Once the target was in his room, another team arrived and assassinated him. All of this was done in the very busy Dubai urban environment, undetected, and in less than 24 hours. And when I say less than 24 hours – all members of the team were out of the country and headed home in less than 24 hours. The operations was very successful and impressive regardless of the media attention it attracted.

The Difference Between Covert and Clandestine

  • Covert definition: To conceal the sponsor or source. That simple. A covert act done properly will never be tied to an agency or government.
  • Clandestine definition: To conceal the action. A clandestine act done properly will never be identified, detected, or compromised by the target or third parties.

Previously, I left you with several concluding questions that led to great comments and posts. I would like to add to the conversations and leave you with more to ponder about. The questions were simple:

Was it Covert?

This is debatable, the diagram above would have most say, NO WAY – THE ASSASSINATION WAS NOT COVERT! But I ask you this – did the team give up what country they worked for? Did the team give up what agency they worked for? Did they leave a stealth helicopter in the hotel swimming pool?

Covert is very hard to pull off these days – lets face it – there are only a few countries that waste time and money building and implementing expensive illusions. These are the same countries that have been fighting terror overtly for decades. Regardless of the true name vs. alias name debate and the identities that were revealed from this “glitch” in their cover plan (diagram above) – if the public says you did it - then you did it.

Which leads me to the wonderful world of deception and misinformation. The question secret agencies ask these days is “how do we influence the media to report something other than the truth?” Basically, secret agencies are embracing the media and utilizing it to influence the public’s thought process, hmmmm…maybe the US pulled this operation off exactly as planned – and I mean exactly as planned and televised – making the world believe it was Mossad…Okay, okay – well maybe not this particular operation…

Was it Clandestine?

In retrospect, the operation wasn’t very clandestine – the mere fact that the Dubai Police Department (not exactly varsity level) was able to piece the assassination together via surveillance footage and interviews discounts the surveillance and kill teams’ tradecraft. There was discussion that technology won – that is correct – but could have been defeated with proper use of tradecraft – I emphasize PROPER. Tradecraft is a tool to protect actions – those actions could be meetings, passing of information, or in this case; kill someone.

Even without the cameras, the assassination may have been uncovered due to the struggle that occurred between the kill team and the target, the cross contamination of the team members seen together at other locations, and their entry in and out of the United Arab Emirates. It was a “clandestine act in time” -meaning what they did during the surveillance and the kill was not caught or observed leading to compromise (no one was handcuffed, the struggle wasn’t heard, no one reported a suspicious group of people following a bad guy) – a successful operational act.

BUT – it was discovered later via investigation and video – making the longevity of the act depreciate from clandestine to murder – and ultimately compromising the surveillance/kill team.

In conclusion, the operation was successful regardless of its very short clandestine/covert shelf life. There are thousands of salient point to draw from its blunders, but at the end of the day – a bad guy is dead and that’s all that matters.

About Our Links
We link to other websites if we find their content compelling. We also link to relevant products on Amazon.com as affiliates. The money we earn from these sales helps keep our website running and a few beers on ice.

Related Posts

  • SOFREP_hamas_militia

    Assassination of a Hamas Commander: What The Media Didn’t Report…

  • North Korean Assassination Kit Explained

    North Korean Assassination Kit Explained

  • SOFREP_escapethewolf

    Hamas Covert Communication Techniques Exposed

Follow Sofrep on:
Follow @sofrep OR  rss
13 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
Old PH2
Old PH2 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Just found this in my newsreader:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/15/world/middleeast/israels-prisoner-x-linked-to-dubai-assassination-in-new-report.html?_r=0

 

Synopsis: Prisoner X may be one of the 26 involved in the assassination of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, in Dubai.  His death in prison while under 24hr video surveillance is suspicious.

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Iran Strikes Back NEW DELHI: The "limpet bomb" attack on the wife of the Israeli defence attache on Monday(Feb.15th), seemingly as a retaliation against assassinations of Iranian scientists, appears to have come as a surprise to Mossad, Israel's external security agency. Sources said a high-level team which discussed the threat of revenge strikes against Israeli targets did not anticipate that Iran's alleged sympathizers could strike in India's capital. http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-02-16/india/31066214_1_intelligence-agencies-device-bomb The article goes on to relate that similar limpet bombs have been employed in New Delhi, Bangkok and Tbilisi. The Tblisi mention suggests a Chechin connection to Iran that's seems new. Russia would not be to happy to find out that Iran was collaborating with the Chechins after all the Kremlins done for Iran in fighting sanctions against them.

pepecaballero
pepecaballero 5pts

I love it when a plan comes together. Lol

LCpl X
LCpl X 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

I'm still with Jack Murphy's take on this, basically the Israeli Mossad is not like the Mossad of the 70s. Don't give them too much credit, it was a screw up and NO the US had nothing to do with this particular op.

It was an intended Covert ops, the term covert as I've always understood it entails clandestine, but clandestine doesn't mean covert--if one says it's covert then autamatically it was also clandestine. Correct?

It was a covert op that just was so sloppy that they didn't think Arab cops could actually put the video puzzle together, maybe they were right about the Arabs, but in the UAE, and this relates to Jack's merc/Brave New War article, Americans were actually the ones that put the puzzle together, how? That's Vegas technology, baby, yes American private security companies, read Jack's article because it ties in perfectly.

Next time, catch 'em in Bangkok, everyone, I mean everyone, passes thru Bangkok and everyone partakes in the fleshtrade, Honey Trap/Black Widow ops, old school ops like that is all you need to kill these guys. Keep it simple.

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

@LCpl X I agree that this mission reflects a different Mossad than in the 70s. I think it represents a different kind from the last 12 months. Mostly a Mossad hit was a car bomb, a bomb in your house or a bullet in your brain from close range. Every once in a while they would do something fancy like this but it was very rare. In the last ten years or so almost all of the terrorist leaders they killed were sent screaming to hell after being atomized by an airstrike. The guys who really like to stick needles in your neck or leg or arm or poison you some other way was the KGB. For an agency that does not do this kind of Op very often(as in almost never) its impressive it went as well as it did. The Mossad burned a lot of agents to get this guy too. Their faces are being recored into facial recognition software all over the world right now. They probably can't ever leave Israel again. It suggests that whatever he was up to was of great concern to Israel. Maybe he was trying to get hold of something nastier than just rockets?

LCpl X
LCpl X 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

@SEAN SPOONTS

Also the problem here is bureaucracy. Like the Chapman base massacre.

To kill a person, I would think you only need at least 2 people. One to kill and another to make sure target was killed.

I don't doubt he needed to be killed. I'm sure he was trying to get hold of something nastier than just rockets. But their op still sucked.

When your intelligence agency becomes a bureaucracy, you can't do anything significant without 10 managers coming along.

LCpl X
LCpl X 5pts

@SEAN SPOONTS

I think Jack Murphy's onto something regarding the quality or vision of the Israeli security apparatus or even its leaders. They kicked ass from the 1940s til maybe the 1970s, then downhill.

I have to think it is bureaucracy, although there are other less tangible features of today's Israel that I'm sure contributes, ie consistently losing world support thru activities like their fast roping stunt, skewed politics, etc.

You don't need more people, just let the smart people you've selected do their work. I don't think the Israelis are short on smart people. Unlike here in the US, Israelis who look the part, speak the part and possess knowledge of cultural nuances is plenty--hell, they have African, even Burmese, Israelis.

I'm no Israeli, so my opinion on this really doesn't count, but there is a book written a couple of years ago by an "Ishmael JONES" titled "the Human Factor"

http://www.ishmaeljones.com/solutions-for-intelligence-ref/

I'm piggy backing on his take on bureaucracy and intelligence. He specifically hints that most newly hired officers, thanks to the 9/11 funding, are just sitting around stateside, because officers are stepping on each other abroad. It's not quantity, but quality, which I think Israel has no shortage of.

Shortly after that Chapman base incident, killing a bunch of CIA officers, managers and analysts (and PSC/SOF guards), Robert Baer's initial conclusion was too much bureaucracy citing you only need 1 case officer to meet an agent. Why there were so many then, is tied to this case. If you're short, stretched thin, why so many?

So bureaucracy, I think, is a big contributing factor.

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

@LCpl X Maybe the Mossad is stretched thin rather than bureaucratic. They are dealing with a revolution in Syria(a radical one), loose weapons in Libya(radicals taking over), loose everything in Iraq, Hamas, Hezbollah, Yemen(radicals on the rise), busted relations with Turkey(which they now have to treat as a threat again), radicals taking over Egypt(surprise!) and Iranian nukes, which I'm certain is their 1st intel priority and consuming vast resources. If I was Mossad director my "A" team guys would ALL be on Iran. Maybe the bungling represents the "B" team operatives trying to fill in for the "A" team guys who are busy ziltching out Iranian nuke scientists. On the Soft Op side you have Mossad agents trying to infiltrate muslim communities world wide and feeding that intel back to foreign intelligence services they want cooperation from, Like MI6, the CIA and probably the Russians and Chinese too. Sound plausible?

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts

I'm surprised that the Mossad didn't take into account the presense of surveillance cameras all over the place. They must have rehearshed and scouted the locations where the op would be conducted in advance. It makes me wonder if they cared all that much about their involvement being revealed at a later date. Perhaps the death by heart attack ruse was intended to give the team enough time to bug out rather than try to make the hit a covert one.
I also wonder how the participants were all indentified as Mossad agents. Is there anything which ties them to Mossad or Israel? Arms dealers like Mahmoud al-Mabhouh can have enemies besides the Israelis. Apparenty the Jordanian and Egyptians were also gunning for the guy. Here's the thing. If I were Israel I wouldn't have any problem saying we off-ed the guy. Not all extra-judicial killings are unlawful. I don't think anyone could reasonably argue that al-Mabhouh was a lawful combatant since he was a Hamas operative engaged in the illegal purchase of rockets from Iran used to target and murder Israeli civilians. We've killed plenty of people for things like that.
Here is another thing that makes no sense to me. One of the phony British passports used by the team went back to a British subject living in Israel, one Melvyn Adam Mildiner, a British Jew who immigrated to Israel nine years earlier. It seems like a huge blunder for Mossad to have stolen the identity of one of its own citizens. The phony passports were British, French, Irish and German, but not American or Canadian for some reason, perhaps because of the origin of their departure. Or perhaps fear that using phony US or Canadian passports would get the FBI and CIA involved in finding out who was making the phonies and that we would uncover the perpetrators. Or pehaps there is another reason the actors didn't want the US even indirectly implicated.
Hamas is claiming Israel did it out of one side of their mouth and blaming Fatah(their rivals in Gaza) out of the other. I have a hard time plugging Fatah directly into this. Where would they get all the mid-westerner looking operatives in Gaza?
Here is where I go off the rails. What if it was us that did it? We see Hamas as being Iran's client while being Fatah's rival. Both Israel and the US are talking about arming Fatah to help them take on Hamas. Our killing the guy directly helps us in the effort to bolster Fatah against Hamas. (If I should suddenly vanish from this site please make public inquiries about my disappearance. lol)

This comment has been deleted

This comment has been deleted

BrandonWebb
BrandonWebb moderator 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

@SEAN SPOONTS When you dig deeper I think it looks like the Mossad may have had their reasons to put this on display for the world. Also makes Dubai look pretty damn secure and high tech with their surveillance systems....

SEAN SPOONTS
SEAN SPOONTS 5pts

@BrandonWebb O.K, I don't believe the US was involved. I'm just engaged in a thought exercise here. I had an instructor in A School who taught me one of the best ways to figure out what kind of submarine you were tracking was to ask the negative; "Why isn't this contact a Victor III? Why isn't it an Alpha?" Eliminate the answers that make no sense and you're left with the answer that does. Here is something new as of Monday Febuary 20th UK time; In other words; Tommorow's News Here Today On SOFREP.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1252034/Hamas-assassination-Did-Britain-know-Mossad-hit.html

The claims being made here is that MI6 and the Foreign office had a few hours notice from a Mossad agent that persons using British passports were going to conduct an "overseas operation." It goes on to relate that Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was lured to Dubai by Hamas operatives he done business with previously. What he did not know was that they had switched sides and were now working for Fatah and collaborating with the Israelis(pretty deep shit huh?).

LCpl X
LCpl X 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

@SEAN SPOONTS

Regarding passports, here's a likely answer::::

Ostrovsky told Threat Level it was common during his time in the Mossad to ask permission of foreign-born Israelis to use their passports for intelligence operations.

“When you come to live in Israel and you’re a dual citizen, a lot of times you’re asked for the use of your passport,” he said. “In the 90s they used to ask. Especially if you’re in the military and you’re an officer and you have dual citizenship.”

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/02/dubai-assassination-has-hallmarks-of-mossad/

But then, he says, there came a time when people began to say no “and they started to do that without asking [permission].”

Ostrovsky said, however, that it was highly unusual to use the name of an Israeli for a kill operation such as this one. Instead, such passports might be used for an undercover Israeli operative in the United Kingdom posing as a businessman traveling to Syria for a week or so for business.

“It’s not supposed to be used in operations like this. It’s not a throwaway. It’s not something you put at risk,” he said. “Having used it this way shows that whoever did it was really in a rush.”

jrexilius
jrexilius 5pts

rockin stuff man. Disinformation and misdirection are old but all-the-more-powerful tools today in a world of mass communication and connectivity. The barrier to entry in the game has gone up significantly, however, with the spread of cheap surveillance tech.

Join the SOFREP Team Room, Support Our Veteran Writing Team
  • Hot Now

    • Stolen Valor Law II Passes House

      Stolen Valor Law II Passes House

      May 24, 2013
    • Spies in America: A National Security Debacle (Part 1)

      Spies in America: A National Security Debacle (Part 1)

      May 24, 2013
    • White House is Dragging Their Feet Re: Benghazi Suspects

      Why The White House is Dragging Their Feet Re: Benghazi Suspects

      May 23, 2013
  • Latest SOFREP

    • Stolen Valor Law II Passes House

      Stolen Valor Law II Passes House

      May 24, 2013, 13 Comments
    • Spies in America: A National Security Debacle (Part 1)

      Spies in America: A National Security Debacle (Part 1)

      May 24, 2013, 12 Comments
    • White House is Dragging Their Feet Re: Benghazi Suspects

      Why The White House is Dragging Their Feet Re: Benghazi Suspects

      May 23, 2013, 121 Comments
    • Hoodlums Howling Allahu Akbar Hack British Soldier to Death on Busy Street in London

      Hoodlums Howling Allahu Akbar Hack British Soldier to Death on Busy Street in London

      May 22, 2013, 463 Comments
    • What's Missing from The U.S. Dept. of State's Mission Statement, and What I've Added

      What’s Missing from The U.S. Dept. of State’s Mission Statement, and What I’ve Added

      May 22, 2013, 51 Comments
    • 3D Printers For SOF Units

      3D Printers For SOF Units

      May 22, 2013, 19 Comments
    • A Team Effort - Part 2

      A Team Effort – Part 2

      May 21, 2013, 12 Comments
    • Is Pakistan Heading Towards a Cliff?

      Is Pakistan Heading Towards a Cliff?

      May 20, 2013, 20 Comments
    • And The Hits Just Keep On Comin'

      And The Hits Just Keep On Comin

      May 20, 2013, 22 Comments
    • A Team Effort - Part 1

      A Team Effort – Part 1

      May 19, 2013, 27 Comments
  • Most Commented

    • Not Mirandizing Terrorists? Slippery slope...

      Not Mirandizing Terrorists? Slippery slope...

      April 25, 2013, 544 Comments
    • Hoodlums Howling Allahu Akbar Hack British Soldier to Death on Busy Street in London

      Hoodlums Howling Allahu Akbar Hack British Soldier to Death on Busy Street in London

      May 22, 2013, 463 Comments
    • Extortion 17 Heroes

      Extortion 17 Heroes

      May 9, 2013, 371 Comments
    • What’s Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      What's Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      May 14, 2013, 271 Comments
    • Benghazi: Book Delves Into the Details Nobody's Talking About

      UT Report: Benghazi Book Uncovers the Details Nobody's Talking About

      May 7, 2013, 245 Comments
    • Attention Whores and Conspiracy Theorists (But I Repeat Myself)

      Attention Whores and Conspiracy Theorists (But I Repeat Myself)

      April 27, 2013, 242 Comments
    • State Department at Fault Over Benghazi Response

      State Department at Fault Over Benghazi Response

      May 2, 2013, 229 Comments
    • DSC_4902

      Why Does PETA Want to Kill Our Special Operators?

      April 29, 2013, 188 Comments
    • SOFREP on Newsmax TV Discussing Benghazi

      SOFREP on Newsmax TV Discussing Benghazi

      May 8, 2013, 157 Comments
    • red dawn

      Battlefield America: Literary Reflux in 500 Words or Less

      April 30, 2013, 137 Comments
  • Topics by Category

    • SOF News

    • Op-Ed

    • MARSOC

    • NSWC

    • USASOC

    • Coalition SOF

    • SOF History

    • Special Operations

    • Black Ops & Intel

    • Admin

    • No Shit There I Was

  • SOFREP TV

    • U.S. Army Rangers Episode 4: Life in Ranger Battalion (Part 1)

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 4: Life in Ranger Battalion (Part 1)

      May 20, 2013, 16 Comments
    • US Army Rangers Episode 3: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 3: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      May 15, 2013, 24 Comments
    • U.S. Army Rangers Episode 2: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 2: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      May 13, 2013, 43 Comments
    • Honoring the Fallen

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: Honoring the Fallen

      December 9, 2012, 4 Comments
    • The Unifying Issue

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: The Unifying Issue

      December 8, 2012, 3 Comments
    • Veterans Day

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: Veterans Day

      December 7, 2012, 2 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 26: Passing the Gut Check

      Inside the Team Room Episode 26: Passing the Gut Check

      November 19, 2012, 7 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 25: SEALs vs. Gangsters

      Inside the Team Room Episode 25: SEALs vs. Gangsters

      November 18, 2012, 16 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 24: Leaving the Teams

      Inside the Team Room Episode 24: Leaving the Teams

      November 17, 2012, 4 Comments
  • SOFREP Radio

    • And The Hits Just Keep On Comin'

      And The Hits Just Keep On Comin

      May 20, 2013, 22 Comments
    • Navy SEAL Mike Ritland And Dog Rico Tour New York

      Navy SEAL Mike Ritland And Dog Rico Tour New York

      May 10, 2013, 19 Comments
    • Mark Donald - SEAL Medic And Author Of Book Battle Ready

      Mark Donald – SEAL Medic And Author Of Book Battle Ready

      April 28, 2013, 10 Comments
SOFREP Network SOFREP Network SOFREP Navy SEALs The Loadout Room Hot Extract The Arms Guide SOFREP Radio SOFREP TV SOFREP Team Room
Listen to SOFREP Radio #1 on iTunes
  • Contact
  • About
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Commenting
  • Advertisers

© Copyright 2013 SOFREP Inc. All Rights Reserved.