Swimming With Sharks
About Our Links
We link to other websites if we find their content compelling.
We also link to relevant products on Amazon.com as affiliates.
The money we earn from Amazon helps keep the beer cold and the lights on.
Related Posts
-
webmindset1
OnTheHook jglow69Agreed 100%. Getting rid of Ka-Daffy Duck was incredibly easy. It's what happens after the BDA that mattered and that's where Obama screwed up. He took the politically-expedient, quick-fix route and that's the easy path that leads to the place we are now... and it's a place we don't want to be. Semper Fi
-
OnTheHook
jglow69 It is not that simple. Getting rid of Ghaddafi is only half...and the *easy* half at that. If you fail to properly plan for what happens after you remove someone from power, and you end up with a problem that is worse than the one you claimed to be solving, the total venture is a failure unless the resulting chaos was an acceptable outcome in the original planning. It's much easier to get rid of someone than it is to properly plan and execute for what happens after they are gone.
-
JohnChristopher1
"I guess every generation has their fair share." / "I actually heard a group of kids talking about how Lenin and the Soviet Union were peaceful and only fought wars because other countries started them." Two words: Pete Seeger. At least there's an excuse/irony for your (ours, actually) generation's unique stupidities: The Knowledge-Ignorance Paradox (or, as I think of it, the "No shit kids in 1900 could name every Civil War battle: They had half as much American history to learn" defense).
-
Recon6
Fred82 jglow69 Rec'd +1 ....6
-
Recon6
jglow69 stupidity knows no boundaries....6









