• The TOC
  • SOFREP Explained
  • The Loadout Room
  • Team Room
SOFREP.com - THE Special Operations Forces Report
SOFREP Logos AFSOC MARSOC NSWC USASOC
  • News & Intel
    • SOF News
    • Op-Ed
    • AFSOC
    • MARSOC
    • NSWC
    • USASOC
    • Coalition SOF
    • SOF History
    • Special Operations
    • Black Ops & Intel
    • Admin
    • No Kidding There I Was
  • About Spec Ops
    • AFSOC
    • MARSOC
    • NSWC
    • USASOC
    • Coalition SOF
  • SOFREP TV
    • Inside the Team Room: U.S. Army Rangers
    • Heroes of U.S. Special Operations
    • Inside the Team Room: U.S. Navy SEALs
  • SOFREP Radio
  • Charities
  • Comms Check
    • Share Your War Stories
    • SOFREP Explained
  • The PX
Home Previous story Next story
submit to reddit
Like us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Youtube
Home » SOF History » The Evolution of the 75th Ranger Regiment, Post-9/11 (Part 1)

The Evolution of the 75th Ranger Regiment, Post-9/11 (Part 1)

by Jack Murphy · June 3, 2012 · Posted In: SOF History, Special Operations, USASOC
RangersOIF

The Evolution of the 75th Ranger Regiment, Post-9/11 (Part 1)

The 75th Ranger Regiment was initially established during the Post-Vietnam War years, when the Army was seriously hurting. Rangers were to serve as role models, and set the example as Airborne Infantrymen who religiously attained and surpassed established standards. Before the War on Terror began, Rangers primarily focused on basic Infantry tasks such as ambushes, raids, and patrolling skills, with the additional responsibility of conducting airfield seizure missions.

Related Posts
  • The Evolution of the 75th Ranger Regiment (pt. 2): Selecting and Building a Ranger
  • The 75th Ranger Regiment is NOT the same as Ranger School!
  • The 75th Ranger Regiment Goes To Hollywood

There was the Regimental Standard Operating Procedures, or RSOP, a Blue Book that when combined with the Ranger Creed dictated pretty much every action a Ranger was to take or prohibited from taking. Load Carrying Equipment (LCE) had a tie down SOP, how jungle boots were worn had an SOP, how dog tags were taped together had an SOP. Discipline and adherence to the standards was paramount and most of the year Rangers would be training on post with occasional off-site training at the National Training Center (NTC) or Joint Readiness Exercise (JRX).

At this time the Regiment was a highly disciplined Airborne Light Infantry unit that trained for immediate short-notice world wide deployment. Like in Panama, Grenada, and to a lesser extent, Somalia, there was an expectation that Rangers would jump into future conflicts, conduct their missions, and catch the first flight back to the US. Training and SOP’s had grown out of these past conflicts, particularly Vietnam, and reflected the projected nature of future deployments.

Rangers during the Clinton years were not nearly as well funded as they should have been. They also had to fill the dual role of being the Army’s premier combat Infantry unit as well as setting a sterling example of discipline and professionalism for the rest of the Army. This meant that shinning boots and pressing uniforms were often as important as training for combat. Attempting to wear these two hats at once is an issue that the Regiment has always had to grapple with.

The 75th always has, and probably always will, be a high visibility unit.

Then 9/11 happened.

I arrived at 3/75 just as the battalion was coming back home, after jumping into Iraq during the opening salvo of OIF I. Of course it was disappointing to miss out on the invasion but I had some second thoughts when I saw dudes limping around on crutches with two broken ankles. They told me that they had been so loaded down with equipment during the combat jump that the static line hung at waist height.

This was 2003 and we were still being issued LCE’s which had to have pouches and canteens tied down with 550 chord (according to SOP) with the ends burned and melted to keep knots in place. However, no one used the LCE and it was being phased out. The MOLLE rucksack and riflemen’s kit was being issued. The rucksack, I shit you not, came with a VHS instructional video on how to put it all together. It also had a plastic frame which was laughable given how hard Rangers are on their equipment. The ruck sat at the bottom of everyone’s locker but the combat vest that it came with was used in substitution of the older LCE.

This was a strange time for Ranger battalion. Things were changing and not everyone was pleased. The standards were still being enforced, but these Rangers had been on real life combat deployments to Afghanistan and Iraq. Judging a man’s discipline by inspecting his haircut or how well his dog tags were taped together just didn’t seem as relevant anymore. When an NCO yelled that doing this-or-that is against the RSOP and will get you killed in combat, it just didn’t ring true to young Rangers who now wore CIB’s on their chest. This isn’t a positive attitude to have of course, but this clash between old school Rangers and new school Rangers was something that continued for years.

As a cherry Private, I got the impression that the Regiment was having something of an identity crisis. We were not counter-terrorist commandos but we were also not toy soldiers who spit polish boots for the parade ground. We were training for combat, but the training was not always reflecting what Rangers were being confronted with on the battlefield. Sometimes it seemed like maintaining a high and tight and a spotlessly clean rifle was the main focus of your day in Ranger battalion.

All of this would soon change. Future installments in this series will describe how the weapons, equipment, culture, selection process, and mission of the 75th Ranger Regiment evolved, particularly in the Post-9/11 years.

About Our Links
We link to other websites if we find their content compelling. We also link to relevant products on Amazon.com as affiliates. The money we earn from these sales helps keep our website running and a few beers on ice.

Related Posts

  • ranger10

    The Evolution of the 75th Ranger Regiment (pt. 2): Selecting and Building a Ranger

  • rangers6_SOFREP

    The 75th Ranger Regiment is NOT the same as Ranger School!

  • ranger-pic-sofrep

    The 75th Ranger Regiment Goes To Hollywood

Follow Sofrep on:
Follow @sofrep OR  rss
76 comments
  Livefyre
  • Get Livefyre
  • FAQ
Sign in
+ Follow
Post comment
 
Link
Newest | Oldest
DanVazquez
DanVazquez 5pts

any change part 2 will occur soon?

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

 @DanVazquez Very soon!

wannabearmyteen
wannabearmyteen 5pts

When will part 2 be released?

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

 @wannabearmyteen Coming back by popular demand!

OldRGR
OldRGR 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Jack I hope you will hit upon their abilities as well as their SOP evolution.

Jboss
Jboss 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Great article / idea! Jack, I came across this on the interwebs and thought it could be of interest. The paper published in 2004 outlines how the 75th could potential by restructured for 2020. Interesting reading. http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA428960

OldRGR
OldRGR 5pts

 @Jboss That was a very interesting paper.  Thanks for the link.  In one aspect it is taking the Rangers back to their roots of operating as companies, as a commando force they were intended to be and not just shock troops like that have been used for as well.

Jboss
Jboss 5pts

@OldRGR - yes but with a modern twist with more organic support like uavs, light armor. In my limited knowledge, the propsed structure is light, flexible and scalable for a wide range of potential missions

Canopylight
Canopylight 5pts

 @Jboss  @OldRGR Eh, it's just some thesis for someone's Masters. Personally, he's basically just applying the Army BCT concept or even the Marine concept to Rangers, even going so far as to consolidate the unit. It's a SOF unit, we don't need all that organic support. Especially not MPs.

Connor31
Connor31 5pts

Great article, I believe the USMC's new standard issue pack has the same plastic frame as the MOLLE rucksack.

 

Off Topic:  I recently came across a book titled 'Outlaw Platoon' and the author Sean Parnell claims to be a Ranger.  Turns out he has only served in the 10th Mountain Division. "Lt. Parnell was attending Clarion University when he watched 9/11 unfold on television. Enraged, he joined the Army and found purpose, transforming from a listless college kid into a reed-tough Ranger with the 10th Mountain Division."

The Army really needs a clear cut definition of who the Rangers are...

Canopylight
Canopylight 5pts

 @Connor. There is one. It's those that graduate from a RASP-class. It's just individuals like to play fuck fuck games with the whole Ranger-qualified bit that predates current Ranger units. I think the USMC rucksack is different. It seems to somewhat resemble current civilian packs on the market. That MOLLE thing was a POS that just cost a lot of money for guys that lost it when turn-in came around.

Connor31
Connor31 5pts

 @Canopylight That's what I'm talking about, there's a general consensus about who the Rangers are, but if there was a clear definition you wouldn't be hearing about the 'Ranger-Qualified' BS. The RTB wearing tan berets doesn't help either...

Canopylight
Canopylight 5pts

 @OldRGR  @Connor31  @seancul55 

Well the idea would be to bump all the ranks. You could have E-6 team leaders for instance and E-5 Joes in the chalk. The whole amount of experience the platoon has would bump up without hurting anybody's promotions. You'd have to work on kicking up retention, which would relate back to increasing everybody's quality of life both off duty and at work. The 75th has made some crucial jumps in this aspect, but there are still too many leaders that want to run it like the Marines.

 

Making everybody a NCO could potentially make people responsible for their own actions. You'll find, Old RGR, that the tab spec4 mafia changed a lot being reduced to overblown Privates. There's a lot of instances back in the day when they would be put in charge of a task, and now you'll see higher NCOs only put other NCOs in these positions. Making everybody a NCO would allow anybody to be tasked for these things.

OldRGR
OldRGR 5pts

 @Connor31  @seancul55 Why does this bother you so much? Most people in the Army know who Rangers are and more importantly Rangers know who is and who isn't a Ranger.  Rangers, SF and SEALs get funding from their respective branch as well as SOCOM.  Funding is not the issue at least not these days.  And how do you know which MOS is RFS out more than another other than guessing because there are more 11B than any other.  Have you been in or attached or worked with the 75th? I can only really speak to the way things were in my day.  There are still some similarities in the 75th today with my time and there have also been some major advancements as well.

 

I have no idea what is involved in re-classing a MOS.  I only know that the senior command of the 75th made the decision not to go the way of SF and one of the reason given was the difficulty of RFS personnel that no longer met Ranger standards.

 

What does rank have to do with the quality of a soldier or the training he has had.  Yes it would be nice to receive that promotion to E-4 so you get more pay, but then you have chalks made up of E-4s instead of E-3s what is the difference.  The promotion is given the minute you come back from RS.  Hence the Spec.4 mafia.

 

Ranger School does not teach the same methods or tactics used in the Regiment.  Ranger School is about mastering the basics of infantry small unit tactics and being able to lead a patrol no matter what the conditions.  It is a great school don't get me wrong and a good kick in the balls.  It's not like their is much of a failure rate at RS from those guys coming from the 75th.

 

I hear a lot of bitching and complaining from SF guys about the 18x program Q-course graduates.  Most don't approve even though there have been some outstanding  guys come out of the program.  I haven't a clue if their complaints are valid or not I'm not SF and never wanted to be.  However, I do know that some form of the 18x program has existed for most of SF existence, from the 1960s up to the 1980s when it was stopped until it was reinstated in 2002 or 2003. Maybe Jack will write about that as well being he did cross over to the SF later in his career.

Connor31
Connor31 5pts

 @seancul55  @OldRGR What you don't realize is that SF receives way more funding and support from the Army, whereas the 75th gets a little more funding from SOCOM. I'm not saying restrict RASP to Corporals, I meant that if you pass the pipeline you are promoted to Corporal similar to how SF promotes to E5 upon completion of the Q-Course. Regarding the imports, its generally the 11B/C imports that get RFS. Most of the other MOS imports generally do better.

seancul55
seancul55 5pts

 @Connor31  @OldRGR Perhaps I'm out of my place answering this one, but it would be harder to RFS a guy because he's earned the Ranger MOS.  What unit are you going to send him too?  His MOS is no longer 11B (or whatever it is), but rather 99B or whatever.  Only one unit would have that MOS: the 75th.  So how could you kick him out without going through a huge headache to get his MOS changed back to 11B or whatever?  As for funding, the Regiment has better funding than SF and the SEAL Teams (Tier 2 vs Tier 3), and is about a third the size of SF.  I don't think they suffer from lack of funding too badly, but then again I'm not there so I wouldn't really know.  I could be completely off-base.  As for raising the minimum rank to Corporal, again I'm not a Ranger, but what I've collected is they prefer to get young privates that they can break in and mold into superior NCOs, vs taking on a "transplant" NCO from another unit that has ZERO experience in what it means to be a Ranger.  Almost all transplant NCOs (which Corporal IS an NCO) don't last very long in Batt from what I've heard.  Maybe Jack or another Ranger could elaborate on these points (or correct me where I'm wrong ha), but that's what I've collected from friends (1 enlisted in 1/75, the other in 3/75), my mentor (Infantry PL in 3/75), and online forums at this point.

Connor31
Connor31 5pts

 @OldRGR Also, if the Regiment had it's own series, the cutoff points for promotions could be pointlessly low such as 15. *Cough*SF*Cough*  ;)

Connor31
Connor31 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @OldRGR That's disappointing to hear. I was thinking that if the 75th got it's own career field then it could start up it's own SWCS-type school, increase minimum rank to Corporal, bump up rank responsibilities, and increase funding from the Army. Maybe my hopes are too ambitious. I'm curious, why would it be harder to RFS with a Ranger MOS series?

OldRGR
OldRGR 5pts

 @Connor. Actually when SF converted to a career field/mos from just being 11B in the early-mid 1980s the Rangers had the same opportunity, but turned it down because the command thought it would be harder to RFS those who no longer met standards if they were Ranger MOS series than just 11B.  That is one of the reasons they have not changed in that manner.

Connor31
Connor31 5pts

 @Canopylight The 75th can start a 75-series Career Management Field lol.

Connor31
Connor31 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @Canopylight  WTF! Why do conventional forces try identify themselves as Rangers? I bet if the 75th had its own branch and MOS series like SF then there wouldn't be as much of this shit. Maybe one day...

Canopylight
Canopylight 5pts

 @Connor. You'll love this. It popped up on a 1/75 facebook group. There's a unit that apparently was on the Ranger's flank in Normandy.  Apparently the German's had mistaken them for Rangers or some such thing, so baam now they call themselves "Rangers" 

http://www.facebook.com/pages/2-16-Infantry-BN-Rangers/108341599277719

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

 @Canopylight  @Connor. The ruck I saw the Marines with was high speed a couple years ago.  Damn, I wanted one...

ahmadnoseen
ahmadnoseen 5pts

I am too looking forward toi readfing of your tactics and procedures. Thank you much.

wannabearmyteen
wannabearmyteen 5pts

 @ahmadnoseen 0.o

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

 @ahmadnoseen Uhhhh....whatever Ahmad. 

Tango9
Tango9 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @JackMurphyRGR  @ahmadnoseen I lol'd

JimEaton
JimEaton 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

Excellent article and one I could relate to.

 

To be 20 years younger!

wannabearmyteen
wannabearmyteen 5pts

I done some research on the pipeline to becoming a ranger but I am a little unsure due to conflicting sources and supposedly changing enviroment. If I was to join the army as a 11b with a option 40 contract around next summer. What would I expect to be in the pipeline? OUST>Airborne School>RASP I? Is there a Pre-RASP I? Do i need some time in another unit for experience? Will I be highly recommended to go to Ranger school? Thank!.

sully78
sully78 5pts

 @wannabearmyteen OSUT>Airborne>Pre-RASP>RASP>BATT>PRE-Ranger (SURT)>RANGER or OSUT>Airborne>Pre-RASP>RASP>SURT>Ranger>BATT for top grads of RASP. What experience would another unit give you for Batt? 

seancul55
seancul55 5pts

 @wannabearmyteen Dude, Google and goarmy.com should have answered that for you.  If not, check out the forums at armyranger.com... it's a treasure trove of knowledge.

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 4 Like

 @wannabearmyteen That sounds right, there is a pre-RASP from what I understand.  There was a pre-RIP which was sitting around doing BS details.  Now they actually get you ready for RASP instead so that's a good thing.  No, you don't need to go to another unit to get experience first.  I remember a dude who quit RIP in my class saying he wanted to go and get his air assault badge before attempting RIP because he was nervous that he would just embaress himself.  I got news for you, no one in the 75th gives a flying fuck about your gay air assault badge.  That is all.

johndixon628
johndixon628 5pts

 @JackMurphyRGR 

That last bit was interesting. Back in the '80's I remember the Cadre of the Air Assault School at Ft. Campbell was 100% Ranger.

Had they boo-boo'ed and were getting punished? lol

PrevailTactical
PrevailTactical 5pts

Really looking forward to this Jack, I remember the standards back in the early 80's ( I'm Old) and see the way things have changed. It will be nice to hear the way it all took shape.

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @PrevailTactical I'll do my best!  The above article already proved to be controversial among the old guard in the Ranger community.

OldRGR
OldRGR 5pts

 @JackMurphyRGR In the early to mid 1980s the change that took place was leaving the older methods of LRP in the woods for  more emphasis being put on SOF type missions and supporting 1st SFOD-D.  That caused major controversies within the ranks.  In the 1970s and 1980s there was money for training and training was global not just on base, NTC and JRTC.  I know that all changed under Clinton.  In my time refer to a Ranger Battalion as just Airborne Light Infantry would not only be wrong but incorrect. When the regiment formed they created a bunch of BS RSOP that did not really matter and that caused a bunch of old timers to leave.  I waiting to read about the current regiment.  So please continue.  RLTW!

PrevailTactical
PrevailTactical 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

 @JackMurphyRGR Some of us old warriors understand the need to change and adapt to ever evolving battlefield, Keep up the good work Jack.

sully78
sully78 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

Look forward to reading this. I was in HHC 3/75 from 99-05 and saw a lot of these changes start to take form but you hit the nail on the head about the old school and new school conflict. I remember COL Nixon talking to us about "when I become RCO I am getting rid of this haircut." He though he looked stupid in his sunday church suit and sporting a high and tight. I remember the 1SG's arguing about hair standards when the memo come out when I was in Afghanistan. 

I believe that right before I left in 05 starting in 04 became a difficult time in the Regiment, it was trying to figure out what its identity was or was becoming. Now I talk with my buddies that are still around and visit Batt every once in a while and don't recognize what I see. They are so much more than what they were when I left. I sometimes think that if the changes started a little earlier and the "special" jobs were available within the Regiment before I got out I would still be around. Or at least would be getting forced out like my Ranger buddies that are up for E8. 

Will_johnson
Will_johnson 5pts like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

I weighed 383 pounds on that Iraq jump. Good times.

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

Will, did we go to pre-Ranger together?

Will_johnson
Will_johnson 5pts

@JackMurphyRGR I can't remember but its possible. We were in A co together though.

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

 @Will_johnson  @JackMurphyRGR Yup, I was class 04-04.  Thought they were going to rename Vaghn's Platoon and call it Murphy's Platoon.

Will_johnson
Will_johnson 5pts

@JackMurphyRGR Oh yeah! We sure did. Me and Griff spent some time there as well. We graduated class 03-04

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

 @Will_johnson  @JackMurphyRGR I think me, you, and Griff went through Pre-Ranger at the same time.  You would have graduated a class ahead of me since I had my sleepaway camp experience over at Vaghn's Platoon.

SleazyWeazel
SleazyWeazel 5pts

 @Will_johnson Before you went out the door, did the jumpmaster put an anvil in your arms like in the Warner Bros. cartoons?.........Plus, did you requisition new knees from supply after the jump?......Jesus.

Will_johnson
Will_johnson 5pts

@SleazyWeazel It was brutal to say the least...

pitt03
pitt03 5pts like.author.displayName 1 Like

It was interesting to see the reaction from the old NCOS when the RCO ordered no more high & tights in 2004.  Many people were not pleased and believed the new direction would end up with a less capable & less professional Regiment.

chrishutch13
chrishutch13 5pts

 @pitt03

 WHAT!?! No more high & tights!?! Sacrilegious!!! HaHaHa!!! Funny, I'm glad I stumbled onto this website... I had no idea the changes. The last one I heard was the beret color change, no sorry, I heard a few weeks ago about RASP.

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

 @pitt03 I remember, the Regimental Sergeant Major had to order the First Sergeants to abide by the new (AR-670-1) hair standards.  Remember the memo he sent out?  Funny as hell...

LauraWalkerKC
LauraWalkerKC moderator 5pts

 @JackMurphyRGR  @pitt03 Tell me there's a copy of that memo somewhere

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

 @LauraWalkerKC  @pitt03 I have some paperwork down in my basement I will have to go shuffling through one of these days.

pitt03
pitt03 5pts

 @JackMurphyRGR Yeah it was good sh*t.  I was on Nama working for one of the other colors at the time.  The RCO's order was passed out and it was pretty much ignored at the company level.  I remember some SNCOs basically daring junior enlisted to grow their hair out with the implied threat of severe bodily harm.  Everyone still had high and tights when the Regimental leadership came to visit a few weeks later and the shit hit the fan.

chrishutch13
chrishutch13 5pts

 @Joliver375

 HaHaHa... that's what I'm saying... hot lather high & tight on at Ranger Joe's on Sundays... don't know what they're missing...

Joliver375
Joliver375 5pts

 @Canopylight They dropped the high and tights? I served with the 3/75 back in 89-92. Haircuts every sunday and I officially hate you guys!

Canopylight
Canopylight 5pts

 @JackMurphyRGR I remember the first time I rolled into 3/75's RDF as a Rippee in Hold. I think all of our first reactions was, "Holy shit these guys have long hair." By time I showed up at 1/75 I was told to grow my hair and fades and such were for legs. I honestly had my hair out of regs quite a few times. A few years later some of the senior leadership was fighting back trying to tighten things up. Rumors even sparked up of high & tights coming back. The fight isn't over. I know when 1/75 first deployed to Afghanistan in '02 they dropped the haircuts for the deployment, so it's funny to hear of resistance to the change in '04.

pitt03
pitt03 5pts

 @JackMurphyRGR I wasn't in battalion - I was there working for the TF main effort's color; I spent a lot of time hanging out with guys from BN during my time with the various colors of the rainbow.  It was interesting to hear the senior guys in the early part of the war bitching about playing second fiddle to some of the other TF organizations, but at the same time bemoaning the 'unprofessional' look of those same organizations.

 

It was definitely cool to watch the Regiment grow in terms of sophistication and capabilities over the next years following the RCOs move to professionalize the force.  Whereas they had indeed been stuck playing second fiddle for a lot of operations in the early days, by '07 they were pretty damn impressive.

JackMurphyRGR
JackMurphyRGR moderator 5pts

 @pitt03 Shit, what battalion were you in?  You know the deal, at 3/75 we had to be very good at obeying orders for better or worse.  I pushed it to the limits having sideburns as long as possibly allowed, the kind of sideburns that get good men killed in combat.  That was when the Sergeant Majors got together to tighten up the standards.  This was also when it started getting really stupid and Plt Sergeants were sticking q-tips in their Rangers ears to make sure that their sideburns did not extend past the middle of the opening of the ear.  Was I ranting about dumb SOP's just recently???

Join the SOFREP Team Room, Support Our Veteran Writing Team
  • Hot Now

    • In the IDF, 'Lonely Soldier' is a term that describes soldiers serving on active duty who have no family is Israel. These are volunteers that came to serve for 3-5 years. They typically go back to their respective countries upon completion. Most commonly, these are people who immigrated to Israel by themselves. I was one of them. While in Israel, I lived in an apartment building where the majority of people were lonely soldiers. It was located on the outer ring of Jerusalem, surrounded by four Arab villages. My roommates were two recon guys (like me) and one who worked in field intel. All of the other inhabitants were soldiers from various units, with most of them serving a combat role. It was a well known thing, especially to the Arabs in the village. Most of the time we wouldn't be there, but when we were on leave, we would come to the apartment for a little R&R. It was rare that the four of us were there at the same time, but once in a blue moon, it did happen. Each village had, as is customary, its own mosque. When the time for prayer came, the loudspeakers would call out to the faithful. It was OK, we were used to it. However, over the weekend they would make it a point to play the call to prayer very, and I mean VERY, loud. They knew soldiers would be in the building trying to get some sleep - recovering from several weeks in the field. This always annoyed me but there was nothing I could do. On this particular weekend, after an intense seven weeks of non-stop ops, all I wanted was to go to the apartment, sleep, eat, sleep some more and then sleep again. That weekend the four of us were at the apartment and we were all equally tired. We arrived Thursday night and after a small dinner and some beers, we went to sleep. At 0400 we all jumped.... The freaking loudspeakers at all four mosques began their call to prayer at full blast. Fuck.... We spent the remainder of the day trying to rest and every time we would fall asleep, again... The call for prayers, full blast! Over lunch, we all looked at each other and knew this had to stop. We came up with a plan. I know it wasn't nice, but at that point we couldn't care less about political correctness. Here's what we did. After some recon that night, we noticed that the call to prayer wasn't performed by an Imam or some other person with a microphone. It was a tape recorder that used a tape. We figured the four of us, experts in stealthy infils, could sneak in and steal those tapes. However, while we were planning the different infil routes for each village, we all smiled and did something better. We recorded Metallica's 'For Whom the Bell Tolls' on repeat on all four tapes and then waited till midnight. At midnight, each one of us - armed with a Metallica tape - headed to a different village. All dressed in black, we were careful not to be seen. We entered into the buildings and exchanged the tapes. We rallied back to the exfil point, a crossroad not far from the last village and headed back to our apartment. And then we waited... At 0350 we went to the roof with some coffee, opened some field chairs and waited for the show to begin. At 0400 sharp the first "call" came alive, full volume: Make his fight On the hill in the early day Constant chill deep inside ... Take a look To the sky Just before you die It's the last time he will Followed by the next, then the 3rd and 4th joined in. Full volume Metallica! Soon after, we heard sirens headed to the villages. I don't know what happened after that, but we had our own private concert, right there. No kidding, there I was... Metallica call to prayer

      No Kidding There I Was... Metallica Call to Prayer

      May 18, 2013
    • A Team Effort - Part 1

      A Team Effort - Part 1

      May 19, 2013
    • 345

      Battlefield America: Literary Reflux in 500 Words or Less, #2

      May 17, 2013
  • Latest SOFREP

    • A Team Effort - Part 1

      A Team Effort – Part 1

      May 19, 2013, 4 Comments
    • In the IDF, 'Lonely Soldier' is a term that describes soldiers serving on active duty who have no family is Israel. These are volunteers that came to serve for 3-5 years. They typically go back to their respective countries upon completion. Most commonly, these are people who immigrated to Israel by themselves. I was one of them. While in Israel, I lived in an apartment building where the majority of people were lonely soldiers. It was located on the outer ring of Jerusalem, surrounded by four Arab villages. My roommates were two recon guys (like me) and one who worked in field intel. All of the other inhabitants were soldiers from various units, with most of them serving a combat role. It was a well known thing, especially to the Arabs in the village. Most of the time we wouldn't be there, but when we were on leave, we would come to the apartment for a little R&R. It was rare that the four of us were there at the same time, but once in a blue moon, it did happen. Each village had, as is customary, its own mosque. When the time for prayer came, the loudspeakers would call out to the faithful. It was OK, we were used to it. However, over the weekend they would make it a point to play the call to prayer very, and I mean VERY, loud. They knew soldiers would be in the building trying to get some sleep - recovering from several weeks in the field. This always annoyed me but there was nothing I could do. On this particular weekend, after an intense seven weeks of non-stop ops, all I wanted was to go to the apartment, sleep, eat, sleep some more and then sleep again. That weekend the four of us were at the apartment and we were all equally tired. We arrived Thursday night and after a small dinner and some beers, we went to sleep. At 0400 we all jumped.... The freaking loudspeakers at all four mosques began their call to prayer at full blast. Fuck.... We spent the remainder of the day trying to rest and every time we would fall asleep, again... The call for prayers, full blast! Over lunch, we all looked at each other and knew this had to stop. We came up with a plan. I know it wasn't nice, but at that point we couldn't care less about political correctness. Here's what we did. After some recon that night, we noticed that the call to prayer wasn't performed by an Imam or some other person with a microphone. It was a tape recorder that used a tape. We figured the four of us, experts in stealthy infils, could sneak in and steal those tapes. However, while we were planning the different infil routes for each village, we all smiled and did something better. We recorded Metallica's 'For Whom the Bell Tolls' on repeat on all four tapes and then waited till midnight. At midnight, each one of us - armed with a Metallica tape - headed to a different village. All dressed in black, we were careful not to be seen. We entered into the buildings and exchanged the tapes. We rallied back to the exfil point, a crossroad not far from the last village and headed back to our apartment. And then we waited... At 0350 we went to the roof with some coffee, opened some field chairs and waited for the show to begin. At 0400 sharp the first "call" came alive, full volume: Make his fight On the hill in the early day Constant chill deep inside ... Take a look To the sky Just before you die It's the last time he will Followed by the next, then the 3rd and 4th joined in. Full volume Metallica! Soon after, we heard sirens headed to the villages. I don't know what happened after that, but we had our own private concert, right there. No kidding, there I was... Metallica call to prayer

      No Kidding There I Was… Metallica Call to Prayer

      May 18, 2013, 34 Comments
    • 345

      Battlefield America: Literary Reflux in 500 Words or Less, #2

      May 17, 2013, 90 Comments
    • north-korea-missiles_opt

      North Korea: Missile Systems

      May 16, 2013, 20 Comments
    • tripoli-embassy-usa-sofrep

      State Department’s ATA Program—A Disaster in the Making

      May 15, 2013, 24 Comments
    • What’s Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      What’s Been ‘Camouflaged’ About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      May 14, 2013, 252 Comments
    • Hoorah! Marine Torturing/Murdering Terrorist Killed!

      Hoorah! Marine Torturing/Murdering Terrorist Killed!

      May 13, 2013, 74 Comments
    • Larry Thorne: Three Wars Under Three Flags

      Larry Thorne: Three Wars Under Three Flags

      May 12, 2013, 37 Comments
    • Screen Shot 2013-05-12 at 12.01.52 PM

      Navy SEALs Charity Scam Update

      May 12, 2013, 75 Comments
    • Brazilian Police: How Not to Do Aerial Platform Support

      Brazilian Police: How Not to Do Aerial Platform Support

      May 11, 2013, 64 Comments
  • Most Commented

    • Not Mirandizing Terrorists? Slippery slope...

      Not Mirandizing Terrorists? Slippery slope...

      April 25, 2013, 544 Comments
    • Analyzing the Chechen Connection to the Boston Marathon

      The Brothers Kavkaz: Analyzing the Chechen Connection to the Boston Marathon

      April 21, 2013, 447 Comments
    • Extortion 17 Heroes

      Extortion 17 Heroes

      May 9, 2013, 330 Comments
    • Chechen Terrorists Hit Boston: The Manhunt

      Chechen Terrorists Hit Boston: Suspect Captured

      April 19, 2013, 278 Comments
    • What’s Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      What's Been 'Camouflaged' About Camouflaged Uniforms?

      May 14, 2013, 252 Comments
    • Benghazi: Book Delves Into the Details Nobody's Talking About

      UT Report: Benghazi Book Uncovers the Details Nobody's Talking About

      May 7, 2013, 245 Comments
    • Attention Whores and Conspiracy Theorists (But I Repeat Myself)

      Attention Whores and Conspiracy Theorists (But I Repeat Myself)

      April 27, 2013, 238 Comments
    • State Department at Fault Over Benghazi Response

      State Department at Fault Over Benghazi Response

      May 2, 2013, 229 Comments
    • DSC_4902

      Why Does PETA Want to Kill Our Special Operators?

      April 29, 2013, 188 Comments
    • SOFREP on Newsmax TV Discussing Benghazi

      SOFREP on Newsmax TV Discussing Benghazi

      May 8, 2013, 157 Comments
  • Topics by Category

    • SOF News

    • Op-Ed

    • MARSOC

    • NSWC

    • USASOC

    • Coalition SOF

    • SOF History

    • Special Operations

    • Black Ops & Intel

    • Admin

    • No Shit There I Was

  • SOFREP TV

    • US Army Rangers Episode 3: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 3: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      May 15, 2013, 17 Comments
    • U.S. Army Rangers Episode 2: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 2: Ranger Indoctrination (RIP)

      May 13, 2013, 41 Comments
    • U.S. Army Rangers Episode 1: Why the Rangers?

      U.S. Army Rangers Episode 1: Why the Rangers?

      May 13, 2013, 16 Comments
    • Honoring the Fallen

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: Honoring the Fallen

      December 9, 2012, 4 Comments
    • The Unifying Issue

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: The Unifying Issue

      December 8, 2012, 3 Comments
    • Veterans Day

      Heroes of U.S. Special Operations: Veterans Day

      December 7, 2012, 2 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 26: Passing the Gut Check

      Inside the Team Room Episode 26: Passing the Gut Check

      November 19, 2012, 7 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 25: SEALs vs. Gangsters

      Inside the Team Room Episode 25: SEALs vs. Gangsters

      November 18, 2012, 16 Comments
    • Inside the Team Room Episode 24: Leaving the Teams

      Inside the Team Room Episode 24: Leaving the Teams

      November 17, 2012, 4 Comments
  • SOFREP Radio

    • Navy SEAL Mike Ritland And Dog Rico Tour New York

      Navy SEAL Mike Ritland And Dog Rico Tour New York

      May 10, 2013, 18 Comments
    • Mark Donald - SEAL Medic And Author Of Book Battle Ready

      Mark Donald – SEAL Medic And Author Of Book Battle Ready

      April 28, 2013, 10 Comments
    • The Clean Up Shot

      The Clean Up Shot

      April 22, 2013, 25 Comments
SOFREP Network SOFREP Network SOFREP Navy SEALs The Loadout Room Hot Extract The Arms Guide SOFREP Radio SOFREP TV SOFREP Team Room
Listen to SOFREP Radio #1 on iTunes
  • Contact
  • About
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Commenting
  • Advertisers

© Copyright 2013 SOFREP Inc. All Rights Reserved.