Republican presidential candidates are now engaged in a laughable debate about who is responsible for the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Hint: Don’t thank Obama for this one.
About the Author
More From SOFREP
They are still debating the Theory of Evolution so why is this a surprise?
Politicians are all about emotion and manipulation. The question isn’t whether what we did was the right thing or not. We can’t change the past. We have no choice but to face the future and try to make it better. Waterborne is absolutely right about whether they would invade Iraq again, because I seem to recall the vote being yes on both sides of the aisle, and I bet that they would make the same decisions again, based upon the same knowledge. All we can do is go forward, but nobody seems to want to even try. They’re stuck arguing about a past that is long gone, while the future is slipping beyond their grasp. Those who can, do. Those who are too stupid to do anything else, politic.
The question isnt would they have invaded iraq back then... The question is; would they invade iraq again?
Love the headline, what I find interesting is how they are looking back to decisions made over a decade ago, wouldn't it be better to ask and discuss what they are going to do about what is going on in Iraq now?
This is the perfect example of how Political Hogs and Media Idiots make strange bed partners. Imho, they should all take a long walk off of a short pier for the stupidity that they subject us citizens to! Perfect Cartoon, Mr. Lang!!!!!