From Ukraine’s trenches to the skies over Bakhmut, the fusion of drones, AI, and unjammable fiber-optic control has made combat both a spectacle and a test of humanity’s moral bandwidth.
In Ukraine, drones and AI fused warfare with real-time spectacle and automated lethality, collapsing distances between trench, timeline, and ethics. This acceleration demands a new global accord convened beyond Europe’s colonial shadow to impose restraint. Otherwise, human agency will yield entirely to code-driven annihilation.
I remember my first hobbyist drone. A bearded man by the call sign “Chechen,” attached to our parent unit, the Ukrainian Volunteer Army (UDA), handed me the controller. The screen showed a crisp live feed; the joystick felt like muscle memory from video games. I rose above the mud-soaked infantry world. The drone let us peer into enemy positions from safety: artificial, thrilling. Power looked down from the tree line.
Then came the footage.
A friend I met in Kyiv showed it to me: a recording from another unit. May 2022, near Bilohorivka in Luhansk Oblast, a Russian battalion attempted a pontoon crossing over the Siverskyi Donets. Tanks clustered on the banks while engineers laid the bridge. Ukrainian drones watched from cover. They recorded every vehicle, every movement, every pause. Artillery struck. The bridge shattered first; salvos pinned the armor like targets in a feed. Hours later, charred hulls and bodies half-submerged, steel choking the river. Dozens of vehicles gone; a battalion tactical group erased. The clips hit Telegram before reports. War became a live-streamed morality play, every strike both combat and performance.
I’d seen ambushes before, but never through a drone lens. The distance was new; so was the clarity.
The screen delivered a rush sharper than my first firefight. Chaos there was immediate, addictive. Here, safer. A human figure in the crosshairs, distant yet intimate. War tilted toward game.
In 2022, with the First Battalion of the International Legion in Kharkiv Oblast, a volunteer mailed me a grenade-drop drone through Instagram. I pitched it to our platoon commander for a quiet Russian OP across the Siverskyi Donets. He refused. Retaliation would follow; better to walk away alive. Restraint in a savage war—a flicker on the feed.
As the war ground on, technology outran ethics. I once spoke with our medic, Caspar Grosse, who told me about an encounter during the battle for Bakhmut. A shadowy figure approached him in an eastern Donbas city, handed him a crate, and asked him to deliver it to the front. When the box was opened by a Ukrainian commander, it revealed a machine-gun turret equipped with AI-assisted targeting. Separately, Russian forces trying to breach a defensive position near Avdiivka encountered an entrenched gun that absorbed artillery, RPGs, and small-arms fire without faltering. When they finally overran it, they found it unmanned: remote-operated, mechanical, unflinching. Whether the incidents were connected or not, they showed something deeply unsettling—the rise of unrelenting automated defenses amid the chaos of trench warfare.
Ukraine had become a crucible where past and future smashed together. Trenches and tanks met code and sensors. Even whispers of chemical agents returned, not as declared doctrine but as deniable rumors—a twentieth-century taboo repackaged in the fog of hybrid war. The lines that once governed restraint felt thinner every month.
I didn’t see the marriage of AI and combat up close until I enrolled in an NGO-run FPV drone school. One student stood out: a Ukrainian developer in his thirties. He wasn’t there to learn how to fight. He was there to observe pilots and write code, building smarter drones that asked less of the human holding the controls.
I remembered Iraq in 2009. Back then, we thought we were on the frontier: GPS mapping, the CROWS that let us fire from behind armor, and the DUKE jammers that poisoned the electromagnetic spectrum to stop IEDs. In Baghdad, signal dominance meant safety. In Ukraine, it meant very little. FPV drones are flown manually in real time; there’s no single button to jam when the threat is watching you through goggles and adapting mid-flight. Jammers chased common bands; drones shifted to sub-400 MHz, 5.9–6.1 GHz, 2.9–3.4 GHz. Then came fiber-optic lines, thin as fishing wire, running from operator to airframe. No signal to intercept. No spectrum to jam. The old logic of electronic warfare collapsed. Once drones went darkline, silence became armor.
Already have an account? Sign In
Two ways to continue to read this article.
Subscribe
$1.99
every 4 weeks
- Unlimited access to all articles
- Support independent journalism
- Ad-free reading experience
Subscribe Now
Recurring Monthly. Cancel Anytime.
That silence scaled. What began as improvisation hardened into method. Teams linked by secure relay, data feeds stitched into one picture. Operation Spiderweb followed: mobile crews acting like neural nodes in a strike network. Live ISR, edited mid-fight, tagged, shared. Combat as content; spectacle as weapon.
The spectacle sometimes cut the other way. A video posted by Preston Stewart showed Russian soldiers surrendering to a Ukrainian drone—hands up, eyes fixed on the flying camera, following its movement like it was a squad leader. Technology, for a moment, became witness and intermediary rather than executioner.
Scroll deeper and the picture curdles. You see wounded men crawling, clearly hors de combat, struck by drone-dropped grenades. Medevac vehicles targeted. The surrender clip feels like an outlier, a flicker of moral clarity in a war defined by its absence.
The information front erased distance. Soldiers carried smartphones to the zero line, texting family through Starlink or shaky cell service. They uploaded command failures, suicide assaults gone wrong, battlefield wreckage—minutes after it happened. Rumors and disinformation rippled across units in real time. I’ve heard a mutilated man push a voice note across a relay while he bled out in the dark. The horrors are no longer hidden. They’re streamed. And we are growing calloused.
The hybrid war found me too. After a Fox News spot as “Ernest Fletcher,” a contact from Thailand screenshotted a private post and fed it to Rybar. My real name, background, and location were broadcast to hundreds of thousands. Death threats followed—dozens a day. One message included a video of a Ukrainian prisoner being tortured and castrated. I broke. Off duty in a hotel room, drunk and angry, I recorded a threat. Within hours it was clipped, stripped of context, and repackaged as propaganda. That was the moment I realized I’d become a foreign casualty of a new front where screenshots and edits do the work of shrapnel. No one trains you for that.
Warfare hasn’t moved this fast inside a single conflict in modern memory. The arquebus took centuries to unseat line formations. Machine guns forced the lesson in blood between Port Arthur and the Marne. Now it’s infantry facing AI-enabled defenses, and soon enough, AI directing swarms at human lines. The balance is broken. The rules lag behind.
We’ve been here before. In 1859 at Solferino, Henri Dunant saw wounded men abandoned in a landscape of industrializing war. That vision helped give the world the Red Cross and, eventually, the Geneva Conventions. We need a new meeting, outside Geneva’s colonial ballast. Abu Dhabi makes sense: a crossroads that understands the human cost and isn’t bound by Europe’s history.
I’ve seen the feed. Restraint fades; escalation rules. Drone will face drone, code versus code. Before that future arrives, humans will still charge the lens.
The machines saw everything. Soon, they won’t need us to watch. That’s when war becomes automatic.
