If you’ve spent any time in the military, you know the rules are written in blood, sweat, and the kind of ink that never really dries. Yet, every so often, a leader—someone who should know better—decides to play hopscotch on the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Enter Colonel Christopher Meeker, once the proud commander of the 88th Air Base Wing at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, now the latest cautionary tale in a long line of officers who let personal desire detonate their careers.

The Charges: Fraternization, Disobedience, and the Ghost of Adultery

The Air Force doesn’t court-martial a colonel every day. When it does, you can bet the story is juicier than the drip tray at a backyard BBQ. Meeker began its public descent on December 29, 2023, when Lt. Gen. Donna Shipton, the commander of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, relieved him of command due to “loss of confidence.” That’s the military’s polite euphemism for “pack your bags, you’re done here”. I know, we’ve heard it here time and time again, but this time you get the rest of the story. 

But the real trouble started after he was fired. The Air Force launched an investigation and, by October 2024, charged Meeker with three violations of the UCMJ: willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer (Article 90), fraternization, and extramarital sexual conduct (both under Article 134). The latter charge—adultery—was dropped as part of a plea deal, but the damage was done. The government had enough to bring the hammer down.

The Relationship That Sank a Career

Colonel Meeker’s military career came apart at the seams after a sustained personal and sexual relationship with a female staff sergeant under his command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. The facts laid out in court painted a clear picture: the two were in near-daily contact, communicated through encrypted messaging apps to avoid detection, and met for sex as often as four to five times a week.  As noted above, all of this continued even after Meeker received a direct, no-contact order from Lt. Gen. Donna Shipton.

Despite that lawful order, Meeker pressed on with the relationship in secret, showing a disregard for both military regulations and the authority of his chain of command. The problem wasn’t just the repeated defiance or the use of secure messaging to cover his tracks—it was the fundamental breach of good order and discipline that his actions represented. The colonel must have thought he was above the rules.

In all branches of the U.S. military, fraternization policies are clear: personal relationships between officers and enlisted personnel are strictly limited, especially when one party is in a direct or supervisory position over the other. These rules aren’t about micromanaging people’s personal lives—they exist to prevent favoritism, protect unit cohesion, and ensure that leadership decisions are based on merit, not personal entanglements. When senior officers ignore those boundaries, it sends a message that rules are optional and undermines trust throughout the ranks.

Meeker’s decision to continue the relationship—despite a lawful order to end it—was a direct violation of these long-standing military norms. As a colonel, he knew the weight of his actions. Yet he moved forward anyway, repeatedly and deliberately crossing lines that were never his to bend.