President Trump hasn’t invoked the Insurrection Act—yet. But he’s certainly been laying the groundwork. Back on Inauguration Day in January 2025, he declared a national emergency at the southern border. Alongside that, he signed an executive order directing the Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security to submit a report by April 20 recommending whether to invoke the Insurrection Act of 1807. That law gives the president the power to deploy the military inside the United States under certain conditions, like quelling civil unrest or enforcing federal law when state authorities won’t.

There’s been plenty of speculation, especially in the media and on social platforms, that Trump might use the law to federalize the National Guard and send troops into states that are resisting his immigration policies. Some have even tossed around the phrase “martial law,” but that’s not accurate. Legal experts point out that the Insurrection Act doesn’t suspend the Constitution or civil law—it’s not martial law. What it does do is allow the president to use federal troops for law enforcement purposes inside the country, which is rare and controversial.

The situation escalated earlier this month when, on April 11, Trump signed a memo expanding the Defense Department’s authority to operate on public lands along the border. That opens the door to a more active military presence in civilian areas. At the same time, Trump has reshuffled Pentagon leadership, bringing in loyalists and pushing out military legal advisors who might push back on these decisions. While neither the Pentagon nor DHS has publicly recommended using the Insurrection Act, it’s worth noting that their advice isn’t binding. Trump can act on his own if he chooses.

If he goes through with it, we could see the National Guard federalized and used for mass deportations or even to suppress protests. That would mark a serious escalation and a major break from modern precedent. Civil rights groups and legal scholars have already sounded the alarm, warning that such a move could pose a real threat to democratic norms and civil liberties. Of course, nothing has happened yet, but they like to get worked up with “what ifs”.

As of today—April 20—Trump hasn’t made the call. But everything suggests he’s keeping the option open, and the next few days will be critical in determining whether this administration takes that dramatic step.

Classes To Resume Monday At Florida State University Following Mass Shooting

Classes are set to resume at Florida State University on Monday, April 21, just four days after a mass shooting rocked the campus community. The attack, carried out by 21-year-old student Phoenix Ikner, left two people dead and six injured. Ikner was stopped by police gunfire and remains hospitalized. Among the victims were Tiru Chabba, a vendor employee who worked on campus, and Robert Morales, the university’s dining coordinator and a former assistant football coach. Their loss has deeply shaken students and staff alike.

Despite the trauma still fresh in everyone’s minds, FSU President Richard McCullough announced that the university will move forward with reopening. He emphasized flexibility, stating that mandatory attendance policies are suspended for the final week of the semester. Students will not be penalized if they choose to stay home. Professors are allowed to hold classes either remotely or in person, depending on the nature of the course. While some lab-based classes may still require students to show up in person, the majority are expected to offer remote options. McCullough also said students who feel unable to complete their coursework can request an incomplete grade.