President Donald Trump’s administration has announced a major downsizing of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and other U.S. intelligence agencies. The plan, recently shared with Congress, involves cutting around 1,200 CIA positions over the next few years. These reductions won’t come from mass layoffs but will mostly happen through natural attrition—meaning retirements, voluntary resignations, and a slowdown in hiring. Some employees have already taken early retirement, and buyouts have been offered to others. A number of junior officers, especially those not well-suited for intelligence work, are also being let go as part of the effort.

Other agencies, including the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), are expected to see similar reductions. These cuts, too, are being managed through voluntary departures and early retirement rather than widespread firings.

The administration says the goal is to streamline the intelligence community and align it more closely with Trump’s national security and budget priorities. CIA Director John Ratcliffe stated that the downsizing is meant to energize the agency, promote new leadership, and help the CIA better carry out its mission. A key focus going forward will be on human intelligence gathering and boosting efforts related to China.

In addition to staff cuts, the administration has eliminated diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs across intelligence agencies. Though a judge has temporarily blocked the firing of 19 DEI staffers, many others have already left. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), now led by Tulsi Gabbard, has also reduced its staff by 25% since she took over in February.

These changes have sparked criticism. Some members of Congress and national security experts warn that cutting staff could weaken U.S. intelligence capabilities, especially when it comes to dealing with threats from countries like China and Russia. There are also concerns that retired or dismissed intelligence officers might be targeted for recruitment by foreign adversaries. Internally, some fear that the downsizing could drain institutional knowledge and interrupt ongoing operations just as the agency is shifting its focus and eliminating some programs.

Overall, the Trump administration’s plan to downsize the CIA and other intelligence agencies marks a significant reorganization. While officials highlight efficiency and modernization, critics argue it may come at the cost of national security and operational effectiveness.