World

British press freak out – Inept media believes naval 5-inch guns are literally 5-inch guns

Yes, the Daily Star has printed this. They seem to have confused the caliber of a new gun with the length of it — UK Defence Journal.

A British tabloid made an embarrassing error Friday, writing a hysterical piece that incorrectly reported the Defence Ministry had paid hundreds of millions of pounds to buy a five-inch-long gun.

Advertisement

“We just blew £183m on a five-inch gun, but it’s ‘a good value for taxpayers,’” read the outraged headline from The Daily Star. The subheadline also reinforced that the author believed the gun was literally five inches, calling it “the length of a toothbrush.”

The only problem? Five-inch guns are named after their caliber, not their length. They shoot munitions that are five inches in diameter, meaning the guns themselves are necessarily huge.

The piece quickly attracted the mockery of those who were more familiar with military terminology.

Advertisement
— Willard Foxton (@WillardFoxton) July 29, 2016 Here’s the Daily Star page that thinks the Navy’s new five-inch gun is only five inches long (ht@UKDefJournal) pic.twitter.com/T8s66GMmfl — Alistair Coleman (@alistaircoleman) July 29, 2016 The article has since been corrected, and now reads as a sort of mundane examination of a fairly routine naval purchase. Read More: Mediaite Featured Image –The crew of the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Stethem (DDG 63) conduct a firing exercise of the MK 45 5-inch lightweight gun at a surface target during Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) Singapore 2016, July 24 –DVIDS  
Advertisement

You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.