Expert Analysis

Machines are the future of warfare and the next step is transportation

Machine warfare is the future. As for humans, our basic instinctual ability to connect with others and inspire action will and always has been the future. But, the ‘shock and awe’ portion of warfare – machines will execute. Machines have been at the heart of science fiction and futurism for as long as I can remember. The first and easiest step might be automatic flight and driving. Autonomous flights have already taken off – and vehicles may be close behind. Machines are on the rise.

Why do we need reconnaissance patrols when small cars with big cameras and seismic monitoring technology could encircle the camp. In fact, these little ground-based drones/vehicles could communicate. They’d use wifi and swarming technology. They’d move toward seismic activity and act as terrain denial. They could even serve as a blockade or explode over IEDs they find. Like the Navy’s new LOCUST program, but on the ground.

North Korea and Israel are riddled with tunnels. While Asymmetric Warfare Group figures out the infantry doctrine to enter and clear the tunnels – machines could just do it.

You've reached your daily free article limit.

Subscribe and support our veteran writing staff to continue reading.

Get Full Ad-Free Access For Just $0.50/Week

Enjoy unlimited digital access to our Military Culture, Defense, and Foreign Policy coverage content and support a veteran owned business. Already a subscriber?

Machine warfare is the future. As for humans, our basic instinctual ability to connect with others and inspire action will and always has been the future. But, the ‘shock and awe’ portion of warfare – machines will execute. Machines have been at the heart of science fiction and futurism for as long as I can remember. The first and easiest step might be automatic flight and driving. Autonomous flights have already taken off – and vehicles may be close behind. Machines are on the rise.

Why do we need reconnaissance patrols when small cars with big cameras and seismic monitoring technology could encircle the camp. In fact, these little ground-based drones/vehicles could communicate. They’d use wifi and swarming technology. They’d move toward seismic activity and act as terrain denial. They could even serve as a blockade or explode over IEDs they find. Like the Navy’s new LOCUST program, but on the ground.

North Korea and Israel are riddled with tunnels. While Asymmetric Warfare Group figures out the infantry doctrine to enter and clear the tunnels – machines could just do it.

Courtesy of hubpages.com.

The Department of Transportation Intelligent Transportation Systems Joint Program Office is working on the policy and coordination of automated transportation. It’s a reality, and many aren’t taking a hard look at its use in war and security, yet. This may be an area where the DOT and the DOD will have work together. The future of convoys isn’t highly trained drivers; it’s machined. But, are we there yet? Yes, we have drones, and we have pieces of equipment that are sophisticated and useful. However, can we envelop these technologies into our existing architecture? No.

Intelligent transportation is coming fast and furious. For the most part, it’s here but is not thoroughly vetted as cyber safe for use. Artificial intelligence and broad strokes are good to go.

The Blue Force Tracker won’t need a human component in the future – because the machines will communicate with one another. On the flip-side, the enemy might be able to control the machines and cyber security is a huge concern. Cyber security is something we’re struggling with as a nation already. We need a serious overhaul in our technological architecture to allow for more intuitive and intelligent systems to be implemented. These solutions need to be enacted before automatic machines rule convoys and aspects of operations because there will be no centrality.

Featured image courtesy of www.denofgeek.com.

About Norwood View All Posts

Ex - Green Beret. Writing represents his own views, which are NOT necessarily those of his former employers in the U.S. government.

COMMENTS

You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.

More from SOFREP

REAL EXPERTS.
REAL NEWS.

Join SOFREP for insider access and analysis.

TRY 14 DAYS FREE

Already a subscriber? Log In