News + Intel

Turkmen Front leaders rejects the notion of Peshmerga returning to Kirkuk

Peshmerga soldiers with 2nd Battalion, 1st Regional Guard Brigade, stand in formation during the Modern Brigade Course 2 graduation ceremony at the Menila Training Center, Iraq, July 28, 2016. Representatives from the U.S. Army, which provided equipment, and the Coalition trainers who taught the course attended the graduation to show their support for the battalion. The building partner capacity mission aims to increase the security capacity of local forces fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. | U.S. Army photo by Sgt. Kalie Jones

According to Turkmen leader Hassan Turan, the Kurdish Peshmerga military forces must remain within the autonomous Kurdistan region’s borders and sending them back to Kirkuk would be “unconstitutional.” Turan, who is the Turkmen Front’s deputy head for Kirkuk, stated that, “The reason for our refusal to allow a Peshmerga return to the province of Kirkuk is because Article 121 stipulates that the Peshmerga are the guards of the region.” he added that the Kurdish soldiers “shouldn’t have a presence outside the borders of the Kurdistan Region.” In the absence of the Kurdish Peshmerga, Turan proposed that a multi-ethnic force protect Kirkuk.

The Peshmerga were the only military forces to hold their ground in 2014 when the Islamic State swept through Iraq. This held true in Kirkuk especially; when the Iraq Army fled the region, the Kurds stood their ground and stopped the Islamic States’ progress cold. The Peshmerga maintained the region’s security until October 2017, when the Iraqi central government sent the Hashd al-Shaabi paramilitary (who have close ties to the Turkmen Front) forces into the city to take over. Since that time, Kirkuk’s security has rapidly deteriorated with ISIS sleeper cells carrying out attacks with an increasing frequency.

Turan managed to speak highly of the Peshmerga in this regard though, praising the Kurds ability to safeguard the region. He stressed the need for both groups to meet and begin a dialogue over the region’s situation to stabilize the political and security concerns. Turan stated that, “We proposed dialogue multiple times, but unfortunately, the Kurdish leadership was the one rejecting dialogue prior to October 16.” To this effect, he claimed that anything that did not involve the Turkmen would be viewed as a “failure.” Turan said that “serious dialogue” between the various factions to achieve “sustainable solutions, joint administration, and consensus-based solutions” was the only option.

You've reached your daily free article limit.

Subscribe and support our veteran writing staff to continue reading.

Get Full Ad-Free Access For Just $0.50/Week

Enjoy unlimited digital access to our Military Culture, Defense, and Foreign Policy coverage content and support a veteran owned business. Already a subscriber?

According to Turkmen leader Hassan Turan, the Kurdish Peshmerga military forces must remain within the autonomous Kurdistan region’s borders and sending them back to Kirkuk would be “unconstitutional.” Turan, who is the Turkmen Front’s deputy head for Kirkuk, stated that, “The reason for our refusal to allow a Peshmerga return to the province of Kirkuk is because Article 121 stipulates that the Peshmerga are the guards of the region.” he added that the Kurdish soldiers “shouldn’t have a presence outside the borders of the Kurdistan Region.” In the absence of the Kurdish Peshmerga, Turan proposed that a multi-ethnic force protect Kirkuk.

The Peshmerga were the only military forces to hold their ground in 2014 when the Islamic State swept through Iraq. This held true in Kirkuk especially; when the Iraq Army fled the region, the Kurds stood their ground and stopped the Islamic States’ progress cold. The Peshmerga maintained the region’s security until October 2017, when the Iraqi central government sent the Hashd al-Shaabi paramilitary (who have close ties to the Turkmen Front) forces into the city to take over. Since that time, Kirkuk’s security has rapidly deteriorated with ISIS sleeper cells carrying out attacks with an increasing frequency.

Turan managed to speak highly of the Peshmerga in this regard though, praising the Kurds ability to safeguard the region. He stressed the need for both groups to meet and begin a dialogue over the region’s situation to stabilize the political and security concerns. Turan stated that, “We proposed dialogue multiple times, but unfortunately, the Kurdish leadership was the one rejecting dialogue prior to October 16.” To this effect, he claimed that anything that did not involve the Turkmen would be viewed as a “failure.” Turan said that “serious dialogue” between the various factions to achieve “sustainable solutions, joint administration, and consensus-based solutions” was the only option.

About Kurt T View All Posts

Spent 4 years with the United States Marine Corps and an additional 3 years with the Kurdish Peshmerga and Ukrainian Army.

COMMENTS

You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.

More from SOFREP

REAL EXPERTS.
REAL NEWS.

Join SOFREP for insider access and analysis.

TRY 14 DAYS FREE

Already a subscriber? Log In