News

Morning Brief: Trump Says No Tomahawks for Ukraine, Drone Strike Survivors, China Fires 9 High-Ranking Commanders

BY Guy D. McCardle

Trump shelves Tomahawks after a call with Putin, a U.S. drone strike lifts two narco-boat survivors into a legal gray zone, and Xi yanks nine generals on the eve of the plenum, a trifecta that shows the world’s strongmen tightening their grip while the rules bend to fit the moment. It’s Saturday morning, October 18th, 2025. Here is your Morning Brief.

Trump talks caution, Zelensky wears resolve—a snapshot of power, patience, and the pause between promises. Image Credit: South China Morning Post

Trump’s Tomahawk No-Go Leaves Kyiv Waiting, Putin Watching

The ask was simple enough. Volodymyr Zelensky walked into the White House on October 17, aiming to lock in Tomahawk cruise missiles, long reach with proven punch. He walked out with a polite no and a caution flag. According to multiple accounts of the meeting, Donald Trump declined to greenlight Tomahawks, citing escalation risks and the need to mind U.S. stockpiles while he chases a deal to halt the war. The session was described as tough, not easy, and short on breakthroughs.

Advertisement

The timing matters. Trump had spoken with Vladimir Putin shortly before sitting down with Zelensky. That call appears to have shifted the center of gravity away from arming Ukraine and toward a ceasefire push that freezes lines where they are. Reporting indicates the phone conversation weighed heavily on Trump’s thinking, part of a recurring pattern where his stance softens after direct contact with the Kremlin leader.

Publicly, Trump urged both sides to stop the war immediately and hold their positions. The White House messaging emphasized continued defensive and humanitarian support for Ukraine, while labeling Tomahawks a step too far for now. That is the essence of a de-escalation bet. It tries to buy space for diplomacy without handing Moscow a free pass. Whether the Kremlin reads it that way is another story.

Zelensky did not arrive empty handed. He floated a creative trade, Ukrainian drones for American cruise missiles, and made the strategic case that Tomahawks would force Moscow to respect range and depth, complicating Russian logistics and command nodes. He left without a deal, then briefed European partners and hinted he still hopes for movement if talks stall. That is a hard swallow for Kyiv, which has argued that leverage on the battlefield is the only leverage that counts at the table.

Advertisement

This decision lands with ripple effects. Allies now have to assess whether Washington’s red lines are fixed or flexible. Moscow will test them. Ukraine will recalibrate fires and prioritize air defense while it waits. The next week will tell us if Trump’s diplomatic track has real traction or if the pause simply telegraphs restraint that Russia can pocket. What is clear is the strategic frame. The United States is keeping Ukraine in the fight, but it is holding back the longest stick in the bag. If Putin reads that as hesitation, he will press. If he reads it as an opening, he will probe talks. Kyiv has to be ready for both.

Narco Drone Strike, Two Survivors, One Legal Minefield in the Caribbean

Two men pulled from the water after a U.S. drone strike on a suspected Venezuelan narco-vessel are now in custody aboard a U.S. Navy warship in international waters. This is the first known case in the current campaign where a crew lived to tell the tale. The strike reportedly killed two others. The survivors were winched up by Navy helicopters and moved to a nearby ship for treatment. Their identities and status remain undisclosed.

This was the sixth U.S. strike since early September targeting boats Washington says are moving cocaine for Venezuela-linked networks. Public tallies put the death count from the first five hits at about twenty-seven. The latest operation produced the first detainees. That makes this more than another splashy clip of a boat blowing apart on infrared video. It becomes a precedent.

President Donald Trump confirmed the action and described the target as a drug-carrying submarine built to haul tons of narcotics. U.S. officials and open-source reporting have tracked an amphibious group centered on USS Iwo Jima working the theater. That platform carries the med capacity to stabilize casualties and the aircraft to run these rescues. The Pentagon has kept unit details tight, but the capability set lines up.

Here is the hard part. What are these survivors in the eyes of the law? Prisoners of war? Unlawful combatants? Criminal defendants? The administration has framed its maritime offensive as an armed conflict against narcoterrorists, borrowing legal logic from post-9/11 authorities. International law scholars and some in Congress are already asking if that frame stretches past the limits of maritime and human rights law. With detainees aboard a U.S. warship, the theory now meets practice.

Caracas is calling the strikes extrajudicial executions. That will not stop the boats. It does set the information battlespace. Expect Venezuela to push at the U.N., while Washington points to interdiction wins and the drug trade’s blood trail across the region. The pressure flows both ways. Every fresh strike raises expectations for evidence chains, recovered cargo, and briefings that can survive courtrooms and committees.

Operationally, the presence of survivors changes risk calculus for both sides. Crews know rescue is possible. U.S. commanders know detention creates chain-of-custody and jurisdiction questions that traditional Coast Guard cases handle by design. If the Iwo Jima group remains the afloat jailhouse, policies will have to catch up fast. The next filing in this story is not a strike video. It is a charging document or a White House legal memo that defines what these men are and where they go next.

 

Xi Yanks Nine Generals. Loyalty Test or Housecleaning Before the Plenum?

On Friday, Beijing booted nine of its most senior commanders, including General He Weidong, the number two in uniform, and Admiral Miao Hua, the former political chief of the People’s Liberation Army. The Defense Ministry wrapped it in the familiar language of “serious violations of discipline and law.” The scale and timing say something bigger. This arrives on the eve of next week’s Central Committee meeting, where personnel shuffles get stamped and loyalty gets measured.

He is the highest-ranking active-duty CMC vice chair to fall in decades. He had not been seen publicly for months, which in China’s system often means the trap has already been sprung. Miao had been under investigation since late 2024 and was formally stripped from the CMC in June. Together, they are the headline, but the purge reaches across key commands that touch Taiwan, nuclear forces, and internal security.

Chinese state statements named seven more senior officers. Among them: He Hongjun from the CMC’s Political Work Department, Lin Xiangyang of the Eastern Theater Command, Wang Xiubin of the Joint Operations Command Center, and former Armed Police chief Wang Chunning. Officials also said former political commissars from the Army and Navy were expelled, which aligns with earlier reporting on Qin Shutong and Yuan Huazhi. That is a sweep of political control nodes, not just line units.

Why now? The official line is graft tied to procurement and promotions. Analysts see a political scrub driven by Xi’s need for absolute obedience before the plenum fills vacant seats on the military’s top bodies. Remember the recent history. Two defense ministers, Li Shangfu and Wei Fenghe, were expelled last year. The Rocket Force has been a repeated target since 2023 because big-ticket missiles mean big contracts and tempting skims. This is about corruption, but it is also about who salutes the fastest when Xi speaks.

Operationally, this matters. He ran the Eastern Theater Command before his promotion, the front line for any Taiwan scenario. Political work bosses like Miao and He Hongjun control the loyalty machinery that keeps units in step. If you are gaming out a crisis in the Strait, you now have churn at the top of the very institutions that would have to fight, mobilize reserves, and keep commanders aligned under pressure. Expect new faces to be promoted quickly once the plenum gavels in. The message to the ranks is simple. Competence helps. Allegiance decides.

Bottom line. This is one of the largest single-day military purges in years. It cleans the slate before a pivotal party meeting and signals that personal loyalty to Xi outweighs seniority or past performance. Watch who replaces these men next week. That will tell you if Beijing is prioritizing warfighting skill or political reliability. My money is on the latter.

 

Advertisement

What readers are saying

Generating a quick summary of the conversation...

This summary is AI-generated. AI can make mistakes and this summary is not a replacement for reading the comments.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR