US Drops the Hammer on ISIS in Central Syria After Deadly Palmyra Ambush
After ISIS killed two US soldiers and a US civilian interpreter near Palmyra, CENTCOM launched a major retaliation strike package hitting more than 70 ISIS targets across central Syria in what officials described as one of the heaviest single nights of fire against ISIS remnants in years.
The US military is back in the business of reminding ISIS that “hiding in the desert” is not a solid plan.
Following a December 13 ambush in Palmyra, Syria, that killed two US service members and one US civilian interpreter and wounded three more US troops, US Central Command kicked off large-scale strikes on ISIS infrastructure and weapons sites across central Syria.
According to reporting on the operation, US forces hit over 70 ISIS targets in what was described as a concentrated effort against ISIS fighters, infrastructure, and weapons sites. The strike package was conducted with support from Jordanian fighter jets, and included US aircraft and long-range rocket artillery.
Reuters reported the U.S. used F-15s and A-10s (we’ve got your “obsolete” right here), along with Apache helicopters and HIMARS rocket systems during the strikes. The target set included the kinds of facilities ISIS uses to keep itself alive in the desert: staging areas, weapons storage, and the support network that turns a few fighters with rifles into a recurring security problem.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth called it a “declaration of vengeance.” The White House made clear that groups targeting U.S. troops will be relentlessly hunted and destroyed. That is not subtle messaging. It is the shotgun click-clack understood in any language.
This was not a random flare-up. ISIS has remained active in Syria’s central desert even after losing territorial control years ago. Cells still hit convoys, probe weak points, and wait for political chaos or security gaps to widen. US officials framed the strikes as retaliation and a disruption move while intelligence on ISIS positions was still fresh.
One key detail for context: reporting indicates the attacker may have been a member of Syrian security forces with ISIS sympathies, which raises the ugly issue only the troops on the ground seem to be talking about. Insider threats are real, and partner force missions come with risk even when everyone has a $-eating grin for the photo.
As of initial reporting, the Pentagon had not announced US casualties from the strike operation itself, and battle damage assessment was still underway. The US continues to maintain roughly 1,000 troops in Syria, with the stated mission of preventing ISIS from reconstituting.
Bottom line: ISIS tested a US element near Palmyra and got a blunt lesson in return.
Already have an account? Sign In
Two ways to continue to read this article.
Subscribe
$1.99
every 4 weeks
- Unlimited access to all articles
- Support independent journalism
- Ad-free reading experience
Subscribe Now
Recurring Monthly. Cancel Anytime.
Russia Ukraine War. Image Credit: The Associated Press
Russia Turns Up the Heat as Missiles Hit Odesa and Troops Mass Near Pokrovsk
Russia is pressing Ukraine from the air and the ground at the same time, and neither move is subtle.
Over the past week, Russian ballistic missiles slammed into Odesa’s port area, killing at least seven people and wounding more than a dozen others. The strikes are part of a sustained campaign targeting Ukraine’s southern logistics hubs, not just to kill civilians, but to choke trade, strain air defenses, and grind down morale. Since mid-December, Odesa has been dealing with rolling power outages as Russian attacks keep hammering energy and port infrastructure.
This is not random terror. It is methodical pressure.
Odesa is important because it is Ukraine’s window to the sea and one of the last functioning arteries for grain exports and maritime logistics. Every blackout, every damaged crane, every burned substation forces Ukraine to spend time and air-defense interceptors on survival instead of offense. Russia knows this and keeps coming back.
At the same time, Moscow is building pressure on land near Pokrovsk, a key logistics and rail hub in eastern Ukraine. Intelligence estimates put roughly 156,000 Russian troops, along with armor and artillery, in the broader area. If Russia succeeds in taking Pokrovsk, it would mark its largest battlefield gain in nearly two years and seriously complicate Ukrainian supply lines across the Donetsk front.
This is classic Russian math: hit the rear while squeezing the front.
The timing matters. As Russia escalates, Washington is pushing a controversial peace framework that would likely freeze the front lines where they are now, locking in many of Russia’s territorial gains. From Moscow’s perspective, that creates incentive, not restraint. The more ground Russia holds when talks start, the better its negotiating position.
That reality is not lost on Ukrainian commanders, who are trying to hold key terrain while dealing with manpower shortages, ammunition constraints, and relentless missile attacks on cities far from the front.
For troops watching this play out, the pattern is familiar. Russia talks peace while loading magazines. It claims restraint while firing ballistic missiles into port cities. It pressures diplomats while massing formations on the ground.
None of this signals de-escalation.
The strikes on Odesa are meant to remind Ukraine that no city is out of reach. The buildup near Pokrovsk is meant to test whether Ukraine can hold another critical node without breaking. Together, they send one message: Russia is trying to decide the war’s outcome on the battlefield before anyone sits down at a table.
From an NCO’s perspective, this is the dangerous part of the cycle. When one side thinks the clock favors them, violence increases, not decreases. Missiles fly. Troops surge. And civilians pay the price while politicians argue.
Right now, Russia is betting that pressure works.
Bellevue PD. Image Credit: Northwest News
Bellevue Officer-Involved Shooting Under Review by County Investigators
An officer-involved shooting in Bellevue, Washington, is now under investigation after a police officer and a suspect exchanged gunfire during a call on December 12, leaving both wounded.
According to local reporting, Bellevue Police responded to a call that escalated into an armed confrontation. During the encounter, an officer fired at the suspect, and the suspect returned fire. Both were struck and transported to the hospital. Their injuries were described as serious but non-fatal.
As is standard in King County, the case has been handed over to the Independent Force Investigation Team (IFIT). Bellevue Police are not leading the investigation into their own officer’s actions. That job belongs to county-level investigators whose sole task is to determine whether the use of force was lawful, justified, and within policy.
For cops, the investigation is the story, not the headline.
Officer-involved shootings are among the most scrutinized events in law enforcement. Every decision made in seconds gets dissected over months. Investigators will look at body-worn camera footage, dispatch audio, witness statements, forensic evidence, and the physical layout of the scene. They will also examine the officer’s training, the suspect’s actions, and whether de-escalation or alternative tactics were possible given the circumstances.
Body camera footage will likely be central to the case. Video does not tell the entire story, but it does provide timing, distance, lighting, and movement details that written reports cannot capture. Investigators use that footage alongside officer statements and evidence to reconstruct the incident frame by frame.
The Independent Force Investigation Team exists to create separation between the agency involved and the review process. In plain terms, it keeps departments from grading their own homework. Once IFIT completes its investigation, the case will be forwarded to prosecutors, who decide whether criminal charges are warranted. Bellevue Police will conduct a separate internal review focused on policy and training compliance.
For cops and tactical professionals, this case highlights the reality of armed calls. Situations can go from routine to lethal in seconds. When both parties exchange fire, investigators must determine who presented an immediate threat and whether the officer’s response met legal standards under Washington law.
It also reinforces why clear command, communication, and after-action discipline matter. Officers involved in shootings are removed from duty, interviewed, and placed under a microscope that lasts far longer than the incident itself.
At this stage, investigators have not released body camera footage or detailed findings. That will come later.
For now, the focus remains on facts, evidence, and process. That is how use-of-force cases should be handled, slowly, deliberately, and without shortcuts.
—
** Editor’s Note: Thinking about subscribing to SOFREP? You can support Veteran Journalism & do it now for only $1 for your first year. Pull the trigger on this amazing offer HERE. – GDM