Jury Weighs Marine Vet’s Fate in Subway Chokehold Case

The manslaughter trial of Daniel Penny, a US Marine Corps veteran, has captured nationwide attention, sparking heated debates about self-defense, mental health, and race in America.

What started as a chaotic subway encounter on May 1, 2023, quickly spiraled into a tragedy and eventually into one of the country’s most controversial trials of the year.

Here’s a closer look at who Daniel Penny is, what happened on that fateful subway ride, and the still ongoing trial.

Who is Daniel Penny and What Happened on the Subway?

Daniel Penny is a Marine Corps veteran and a college student studying architecture. With four years of military service, Penny has been described as someone who values order, safety, and responsibility.

On that spring day in May, the then-24-year-old Vet was on his way from class to the gym when he encountered Jordan Neely on a New York City subway.

This was no ordinary subway ride, though—it was a moment that would ultimately change Penny’s life and cast him into the center of a media firestorm.

Jordan Neely, a 30-year-old homeless man known for his Michael Jackson impersonations, was reportedly in the middle of a mental health crisis.

Witnesses said he was shouting, making aggressive gestures, and creating a tense atmosphere on the train.

Neely allegedly threatened harm, saying he was ready to die or go to jail, although he hadn’t physically assaulted anyone.

Seeing this as a potential threat to other passengers, Penny, with the help of two other bystanders, pinned Neely to the ground and put him in a chokehold.

But what Penny intended as an act of protection went horribly wrong.

The Marine Vet held Neely in a “compression of neck” or chokehold for over three minutes, long enough for Neely to go limp and lose consciousness.

Tragically, Neely didn’t survive, and the medical examiner later ruled his death a homicide due to neck compression.

The Case: From Subway Tragedy to Manslaughter Charges

Penny’s actions divided New Yorkers and the country as a whole.

To some, he was a hero who acted out of courage and concern for others on the subway. To others, he was a white man who took the life of a Black man who was mentally ill and in distress, essentially acting as a vigilante.

This complex debate only grew more intense when Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office charged Penny with second-degree manslaughter.

“Daniel Penny stands indicted for Manslaughter after allegedly putting Jordan Neely in a deadly chokehold for several minutes until and after he stopped moving. I hope Mr. Neely’s loved ones are on the path towards healing as they continue to mourn this tragic loss,” said Bragg in a statement released in June 2023.

Penny was released on a $100,000 bond, but the weight of the trial loomed over him.

Supporters rallied behind him, donating millions to his legal fund, while critics, including some of Neely’s family members, called for justice for Neely, arguing that Penny used excessive force against someone in crisis.

The Trial

Jury selection was a thorough process, taking eight days to narrow down the jurors from over 100 Manhattan residents.

Jurors were asked about their views on mental health, subway safety, and personal experiences with crime to ensure a balanced perspective on the case.

The trial began Friday with both sides laying out their interpretations of what happened.

Prosecutors portrayed the actions of the now-25-year-old as excessive and reckless, arguing that he saw Neely as a “threat” rather than a human being. They painted a picture of a man who, despite his military training, ignored the signs that Neely was in distress and didn’t attempt to help him once he went limp.

In contrast, the defense described Penny as a young man who simply stepped up to protect others. His lawyer argued that he had no intent to kill but was acting out of genuine concern for the safety of those around him.

The defense argued that Penny was only trying to hold Neely down long enough for police to arrive, claiming that Penny wasn’t applying continuous pressure on Neely’s neck and suggested other potential factors, including the effects of drugs found in Neely’s system, might have contributed to his death.

The trial also touched on deeply emotional aspects of Neely’s life. He had a history of mental illness and substance abuse, struggles that had intensified after his mother was murdered when he was young. His family and supporters emphasized that Neely’s mental health crisis should have been met with compassion, not deadly force.

Trial Still On Going: Nevertheless, A Turning Point in Public Debate

After a tense few weeks, the trial of Daniel Penny continues, as of writing, no verdict has been reached yet. The proceedings began on November 1, with opening statements from both the prosecution and defense. As the trial unfolds, many are closely watching the discussions surrounding mental health, public safety, and the role of bystanders, as the eventual verdict could set a significant precedent for how individuals respond in high-stress situations in public spaces. A verdict is expected in the coming weeks.

Nevertheless, the trial has been seen by many as a lesson in the complex intersections of justice, mental health, and race in modern America. Whether one views Penny as a hero or a vigilante, his case has raised important questions about how we approach mental health crises in public settings and the role each of us might play when safety concerns arise.

Correction Notice: A correction has been made to the original article to clarify details regarding the ongoing trial of Daniel Penny. We strive for accuracy and appreciate our readers’ understanding. Thank you for your attention to this matter.