U.S. Army Pfc. Daniel Candales, assigned to the 82nd Airborne Division, uses the tactical robotic controller to control the expeditionary modular autonomous vehicle as a practice exercise in preparation for Project Convergence at Yuma Proving Ground, Ariz., October 19, 2021.(Source: Patrick Hunter/DVIDS)
The US Army has been developing various robotic and artificial intelligence (AI) projects to further integrate technology into modern warfare. However, many doubt that this innovation could actually help us foster peace.
Next year, the Army will launch a robot combat competition and plans to spend around $750 million in the next five years to develop the Robotic Combat Vehicle-Light (RCV-L) program in partnership with QinetiQ North America. QinetiQ won the federal contract in 2020, and the company plans to introduce its prototype in the competition.
Just this year, the Army also approved the rapid prototyping for the RCV-L, where “design-upgrade test” cycles would cover operational pilots. During these testing, the soldiers will provide feedback on their capabilities.
With the upcoming competition, the Army is looking to award a significant contract to the winner, who will then produce the first prototype units to be delivered by 2028. According to Maj. Cory Wallace, who leads the Army’s Next Generation Combat Vehicles Cross-Functional Team, they will focus on how the programmers will integrate technology into the battlefield. Wallace also noted the importance of taking insights from the “civilian world,” according to Defense News.
“With the RCVs, we are looking at such new systems and new approaches,” Wallace said in an interview with C4ISRNET. “A lot of the testing procedures that are currently employed are not the most efficient.”
Fixing the Gap
When you have autonomous vehicles and weaponry on the battlefield, it is hard to say if both sides are playing a level field. So, to make sure these futuristic vehicles and weapons adhere to the Geneva Convention, Wallace said certification of these vehicles could be the key.
Military combat vehicles usually pass specific benchmarks and maintenance scores to be eligible for use. As for robotic vehicles, they might need to pass more rigorous thresholds. Testing and evaluation metrics should also be higher for autonomous vehicles.
The Army is looking to develop autonomous vehicles in three categories: light, medium, and heavy. These could be used for infantry movement, surveillance, and attack/defense. According to C4ISRNET, the light and medium prototypes have already started testing this summer at Fort Hood, Texas. According to Brig. Gen. Geoffrey Norman, the director of the Next Generation Combat Vehicles Cross-Functional Team, says more examinations are needed to verify the range of capabilities of these light and medium vehicles.
The US Army has been developing various robotic and artificial intelligence (AI) projects to further integrate technology into modern warfare. However, many doubt that this innovation could actually help us foster peace.
Next year, the Army will launch a robot combat competition and plans to spend around $750 million in the next five years to develop the Robotic Combat Vehicle-Light (RCV-L) program in partnership with QinetiQ North America. QinetiQ won the federal contract in 2020, and the company plans to introduce its prototype in the competition.
Just this year, the Army also approved the rapid prototyping for the RCV-L, where “design-upgrade test” cycles would cover operational pilots. During these testing, the soldiers will provide feedback on their capabilities.
With the upcoming competition, the Army is looking to award a significant contract to the winner, who will then produce the first prototype units to be delivered by 2028. According to Maj. Cory Wallace, who leads the Army’s Next Generation Combat Vehicles Cross-Functional Team, they will focus on how the programmers will integrate technology into the battlefield. Wallace also noted the importance of taking insights from the “civilian world,” according to Defense News.
“With the RCVs, we are looking at such new systems and new approaches,” Wallace said in an interview with C4ISRNET. “A lot of the testing procedures that are currently employed are not the most efficient.”
Fixing the Gap
When you have autonomous vehicles and weaponry on the battlefield, it is hard to say if both sides are playing a level field. So, to make sure these futuristic vehicles and weapons adhere to the Geneva Convention, Wallace said certification of these vehicles could be the key.
Military combat vehicles usually pass specific benchmarks and maintenance scores to be eligible for use. As for robotic vehicles, they might need to pass more rigorous thresholds. Testing and evaluation metrics should also be higher for autonomous vehicles.
The Army is looking to develop autonomous vehicles in three categories: light, medium, and heavy. These could be used for infantry movement, surveillance, and attack/defense. According to C4ISRNET, the light and medium prototypes have already started testing this summer at Fort Hood, Texas. According to Brig. Gen. Geoffrey Norman, the director of the Next Generation Combat Vehicles Cross-Functional Team, says more examinations are needed to verify the range of capabilities of these light and medium vehicles.
Additionally, the Army is also looking to create a diversified plan for developing autonomous vehicles. Unlike the unified approach, Steve Jobs used in developing Apple products, the Army’s acquisition strategy is more similar to Microsoft, where the software and hardware sources are separate. According to Maj. Gen. Glen Dean, Army’s program executive officer for ground combat systems, development of the entire program should be “software-centric” and should be able to support future robotic configurations.
“A core element of the program that we’re executing is about establishing the base-vehicle architecture and the base-software architecture so that you can come in and subsequently add capabilities as modules of software that don’t require you to go back and test every other module of software to verify that it still functions appropriately,” he said.
Once first-phase prototype testing is completed, they can ramp up the medium-sized testing.
As someone who’s seen what happens when the truth is distorted, I know how unfair it feels when those who’ve sacrificed the most lose their voice. At SOFREP, our veteran journalists, who once fought for freedom, now fight to bring you unfiltered, real-world intel. But without your support, we risk losing this vital source of truth. By subscribing, you’re not just leveling the playing field—you’re standing with those who’ve already given so much, ensuring they continue to serve by delivering stories that matter. Every subscription means we can hire more veterans and keep their hard-earned knowledge in the fight. Don’t let their voices be silenced. Please consider subscribing now.
One team, one fight,
Brandon Webb former Navy SEAL, Bestselling Author and Editor-in-Chief
Barrett is the world leader in long-range, large-caliber, precision rifle design and manufacturing. Barrett products are used by civilians, sport shooters, law enforcement agencies, the United States military, and more than 75 State Department-approved countries around the world.
PO Box 1077 MURFREESBORO, Tennessee 37133 United States
Scrubba Wash Bag
Our ultra-portable washing machine makes your journey easier. This convenient, pocket-sized travel companion allows you to travel lighter while helping you save money, time and water.
Our roots in shooting sports started off back in 1996 with our founder and CEO, Josh Ungier. His love of airguns took hold of our company from day one and we became the first e-commerce retailer dedicated to airguns, optics, ammo, and accessories. Over the next 25 years, customers turned to us for our unmatched product selection, great advice, education, and continued support of the sport and airgun industry.
COMMENTS
There are on this article.
You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.