The Bolduc Brief: The Contradictory Landscape of U.S. Foreign Policy – From Promoting Democracy to Embracing Interventionism Under the Trump Administration

The hard-nosed realism of foreign policy during the Trump administration marks a significant shift toward recognizing zones of influence dominated by great powers. This approach positions China as an influential force in the Pacific, the United States as the primary player in the Western Hemisphere, and acknowledges Russia’s influence in Europe. While this stance reflects a reconfiguration of international power dynamics, it raises important questions about the underlying values, stability, potential future conflict guiding U.S. diplomatic efforts.

A Shift in Diplomatic Focus

Promotion of Democracy and Freedom:

Traditionally, U.S. foreign policy emphasized the promotion of democracy, support for nation-building, and leadership in the protection of freedom and human rights. This moral framework served not only as a guiding principle for engagement with other nations but also as a means to set a positive global example.

Pragmatism and Realism:

The Trump administration’s pivot to a more hard-nosed realism reflects a departure from these ideals. With a focus on national interest and power dynamics, the administration appears to prioritize immediate geopolitical advantages over the long-term promotion of democratic values and global stability. Bad decisions for the use of the US military in regime change and interventionism is not a justification to change foreign policy principles that have led to America being a world leader. It is a recognition that it is not our foreign policy principles that are the problem, it is bad decisions by political leaders. America has to be better at the decisions it makes.

The Consequences of Interventionism

Involvement in Undefined Wars:

The administration’s approach has led to continued U.S. involvement in undefined wars and interventions that lack clear objectives. These actions often result in entanglements that fail to advance genuine democratic principles while diverting resources and attention from constructive diplomatic initiatives. The administration’s actions in Central America are an example of undefined wars. The failure to recognize this completely undermines the idea of hard-nose realism.

Support for Undemocratic Regimes:

There is a troubling narrative emerging from the administration’s foreign policy, characterized by support for regimes and leaders who exhibit autocratic tendencies. This not only undermines the core tenets of freedom and democracy but also poses risks to stability and human rights in affected regions.

Dangerous Alliances:

By aligning with dictatorial regimes, the Trump administration risks compromising U.S. credibility on the world stage. This support can embolden authoritarian leaders while disillusioning populations yearning for freedom and democratic governance. It appears that the Trump administration is confusing, productive strategic diplomatic relationships with dangerously empowering dictatorships in governments that do not promote and value democratic principles.