A view of the Naval Base, Subic Bay, with the city of Olongapo in the background. (Source: NARA)
The Chinese government has sent a warning to the Philippines that allowing the United States armed forces to access more military bases could “greatly prejudice Philippine national interests and jeopardize regional tranquility and steadiness,” being one of the first open indications of Chinese displeasure with the quickening security ties between the two nations.
In February, the Philippine government consented to US military access to four extra bases under the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). The EDCA allows US military units to rotate through a certain number of bases initially chosen by Manila.
On Sunday, the Chinese Embassy in Manila declared that offering the United States more access to Philippine armed forces bases would draw the Philippines into a “geopolitical struggle.” In their official statement, China notes:
“We noted that intense debates have been going on recently in the Philippines about the four additional military sites to which the US forces would have access under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). The governors of Cagayan and Isabela are not the only ones who publicly expressed reservation to having their provinces used as EDCA sites. Former President Duterte also questioned the merits of having additional EDCA bases open to the US in an interview with SMNI TV. The Philippine Senate Committee on Foreign Relations held a hearing, in which quite some Senators, local offcials and legal experts raised concerns about new EDCA sites. A number of think-tanks and scholars as well as NGOs published articles, held forums or even took to the street to voice their opposition. People are asking the Philippine government to disclose the locations of the new EDCA sites. Those visionary people all asked the soul-searching questions: If the new sites are located in Cagayan and Isabela, which are close to Taiwan, does the US really intend to help the Philippines in disaster relief with these EDCA sites? And is it really in the national interest of the Philippines to get dragged by the US to interfere in the Taiwan question?”
The United States has signed a Defense Agreement with the Philippines that will allow U.S Military Forces to develop an additional 4 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement Sites around the Country while allowing the completion the 5 other Sites already being Constructed. pic.twitter.com/f6oZAQD3VD
In reaction to MaryKay Carlson, the US Ambassador to the Philippines, who stated on a local TV program the preceding day that other access was designed to enable US forces to swiftly deal with humanitarian concerns in the area, the Chinese issued a statement. According to an interview with Carlson, the EDCA sites provide provincial and local governments with the capacity to both develop their economic standing and enhance their security.
The Chinese government has sent a warning to the Philippines that allowing the United States armed forces to access more military bases could “greatly prejudice Philippine national interests and jeopardize regional tranquility and steadiness,” being one of the first open indications of Chinese displeasure with the quickening security ties between the two nations.
In February, the Philippine government consented to US military access to four extra bases under the 2014 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). The EDCA allows US military units to rotate through a certain number of bases initially chosen by Manila.
On Sunday, the Chinese Embassy in Manila declared that offering the United States more access to Philippine armed forces bases would draw the Philippines into a “geopolitical struggle.” In their official statement, China notes:
“We noted that intense debates have been going on recently in the Philippines about the four additional military sites to which the US forces would have access under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA). The governors of Cagayan and Isabela are not the only ones who publicly expressed reservation to having their provinces used as EDCA sites. Former President Duterte also questioned the merits of having additional EDCA bases open to the US in an interview with SMNI TV. The Philippine Senate Committee on Foreign Relations held a hearing, in which quite some Senators, local offcials and legal experts raised concerns about new EDCA sites. A number of think-tanks and scholars as well as NGOs published articles, held forums or even took to the street to voice their opposition. People are asking the Philippine government to disclose the locations of the new EDCA sites. Those visionary people all asked the soul-searching questions: If the new sites are located in Cagayan and Isabela, which are close to Taiwan, does the US really intend to help the Philippines in disaster relief with these EDCA sites? And is it really in the national interest of the Philippines to get dragged by the US to interfere in the Taiwan question?”
The United States has signed a Defense Agreement with the Philippines that will allow U.S Military Forces to develop an additional 4 Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement Sites around the Country while allowing the completion the 5 other Sites already being Constructed. pic.twitter.com/f6oZAQD3VD
In reaction to MaryKay Carlson, the US Ambassador to the Philippines, who stated on a local TV program the preceding day that other access was designed to enable US forces to swiftly deal with humanitarian concerns in the area, the Chinese issued a statement. According to an interview with Carlson, the EDCA sites provide provincial and local governments with the capacity to both develop their economic standing and enhance their security.
The Chinese embassy stated that, despite US assertions that the EDCA sites are meant to support the Philippines’ disaster relief efforts and even encourage local economies, the real intention is for them to be part of the American strategy to encircle and keep China in check through their military alliance.
It was noted that there had been some unease about the four new military bases to be part of the EDCA, with the Philippine government claiming that the sites are yet to be decided. This is especially true for some provincial governors from Luzon, the country’s northernmost island, as they have expressed their apprehension in the press about the potential of US forces rotating through military bases in their areas.
During a recent Senate hearing, Senator Imee Marcos, sister to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr., questioned why the Philippines was chosen to build military bases in the north when its main objective is to protect its sovereignty over the South China Sea to the west.
“Peace and development remain the theme of this era and the call of peoples around the world. However, the US, to secure its hegemony and selfish geopolitical interests and out of the cold-war mentality, keeps upgrading military cooperation with the Philippines by adding EDCA bases and military deployment in this country. Whereas the US claims that such cooperation is intended to help the disaster relief efforts of the Philippines and some Americans even tout the EDCA sites as driver of local economy, it is plain and simple that those moves are part of the US efforts to encirle and contain China through its military alliance with this country,” China’s statement claims.
The Chinese voiced their opinion on the matter by asking if it would be beneficial to the Philippines to be pulled into the US’s dispute with Taiwan. They warned that involving the Philippines in geopolitical conflicts could put their national interests in danger and peace and stability in the region.
Although the statement may have been stated in a way that exaggerates the US effort to “secure its hegemony and selfish geopolitical interests,” the basic truth of it is that the expansion of EDCA is an attempt to restrain and manage the power of China.
The statement does not consider that Chinese activities have been an important factor in the intensifying strategic competition in the western Pacific. On the contrary, Beijing deserves to be blamed for the same actions they are accusing the US of – attempting to establish their control over the region by rapidly advancing their military and claiming much of the South China Sea.
China has expressed its worry about the strengthening of Philippine-U.S. relations since President Marcos assumed office in 2016. As a result, it is attempting to exploit internal divisions in the Philippines to further its objectives.
The current state of China-US relations is characterized by an escalating security dilemma, with both countries perceiving the other’s actions as profoundly menacing while considering their actions justifiable and defensive. This dynamic is worrisome for third nations, like the Philippines, which could be negatively impacted in case of a confrontation.
Asian Proxy War
The US and China look like they have been engaged in a proxy war in the Philippines for some time now. The two countries are vying for regional influence, with both sides using the Philippines as a strategic leverage point. The US has sought to increase its military presence in the country, while China has sought to expand its economic and political ties.
The US-China rivalry has been escalating in recent years, with both sides seeking to gain an advantage over the other. In 2020, the US signed a deal with the Philippines, allowing it to build military bases on Philippine soil. This was seen as a direct challenge to China’s growing regional influence.
According to Anna Malindog-Uy, ACPh’s vice president for external affairs said, Washington’s militarization of Asia, this proxy war could be a detrimental trap for the Philippines. Malindog-Uy adds, “Washington is exerting all efforts to preserve its global hegemony at the expense of destroying Asia.”
Meanwhile, Former Philippine senator Anna Dominique Coseteng urges the government not to be blinded by the large monetary pledges.
“Are we going to forget the tragedy, the travesty and the pain that was brought by Clark Air Base (in Pampanga) (and) the Subic Naval Base (in Olongapo) to our country and our people?,” Coseteng said.
“My question is, what is wrong with peace? Why is there so much disgust and hatred for peace?,” Coseteng said, noting that increased US military presence in the Philippines will make the country a “springboard to attack other countries.”
Since then, tensions between the two countries have only increased. In 2021, China began building artificial islands in disputed waters near the Philippines, prompting protests from Manila and Washington alike. The US also increased its military presence by deploying warships and aircraft carriers near Chinese-controlled islands.
In response, China has sought to strengthen its ties with Manila through economic investment and diplomatic outreach. However, Beijing has also increased its naval presence around disputed areas of the South China Sea, further heightening tensions between Washington and Beijing.
The situation is further complicated by Taiwan’s role in this proxy war between China and the US. Taiwan is an important ally of both countries and is seen as a potential flashpoint for conflict between them should tensions escalate further. As such, both sides are keenly aware of how their actions could affect Taiwan’s security situation.
Ultimately, this proxy war between China and the US will continue for some time as both sides seek to gain an advantage in the Asia Pacific. It remains to be seen how this will play out, but one thing is sure: it will have far-reaching implications for regional stability and security for years to come.
As someone who’s seen what happens when the truth is distorted, I know how unfair it feels when those who’ve sacrificed the most lose their voice. At SOFREP, our veteran journalists, who once fought for freedom, now fight to bring you unfiltered, real-world intel. But without your support, we risk losing this vital source of truth. By subscribing, you’re not just leveling the playing field—you’re standing with those who’ve already given so much, ensuring they continue to serve by delivering stories that matter. Every subscription means we can hire more veterans and keep their hard-earned knowledge in the fight. Don’t let their voices be silenced. Please consider subscribing now.
One team, one fight,
Brandon Webb former Navy SEAL, Bestselling Author and Editor-in-Chief
Barrett is the world leader in long-range, large-caliber, precision rifle design and manufacturing. Barrett products are used by civilians, sport shooters, law enforcement agencies, the United States military, and more than 75 State Department-approved countries around the world.
PO Box 1077 MURFREESBORO, Tennessee 37133 United States
Scrubba Wash Bag
Our ultra-portable washing machine makes your journey easier. This convenient, pocket-sized travel companion allows you to travel lighter while helping you save money, time and water.
Our roots in shooting sports started off back in 1996 with our founder and CEO, Josh Ungier. His love of airguns took hold of our company from day one and we became the first e-commerce retailer dedicated to airguns, optics, ammo, and accessories. Over the next 25 years, customers turned to us for our unmatched product selection, great advice, education, and continued support of the sport and airgun industry.
COMMENTS
There are on this article.
You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.