The Bolduc Brief: Analyzing the U.S. National Security Strategy Under the Trump Administration

The release of the U.S. National Security Strategy (NSS) represents a pivotal moment for any presidential administration, serving as an official declaration of foreign policy priorities and strategies. Recently, the White House unveiled the NSS under the Trump administration, a document that not only outlines the administration’s views on global issues but also reflects the personal perspectives of President Trump himself. While these documents are traditionally the product of a committee and guided by legislative requirements, they ultimately carry the president’s signature and vision, giving them a distinct character from previous strategies.

A Non-Isolationist Stance

One of the most notable aspects of the current NSS is its rejection of the notion that President Trump embodies isolationist tendencies. Contrary to some perceptions, the Trump strategy does not advocate for a complete withdrawal from international engagements. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of active foreign policy while prioritizing domestic concerns. Despite promoting the narrative of “America First,” Trump does not shy away from celebrating his administration’s diplomatic accomplishments—particularly in the context of international peace deals and countering threats from adversaries such as Iran. This suggests a dual approach of maintaining necessary foreign entanglements while redefining their significance to prioritize the immediate welfare of American citizens.

From Trump’s perspective, the focus on drug cartels and irregular migration in the Western Hemisphere showcases a shift in perceived threats. Previous administrations have often emphasized more conventional security threats from nations like Russia and China. In contrast, Trump’s NSS highlights these domestic issues as direct threats, aligning with his broader narrative around safeguarding Americans. This thematic shift underlines a fundamental reorientation of U.S. foreign policy toward addressing issues that resonate more familiarly and significantly with the American populace.

The Civilizational Lens

Another critical element of the NSS is its framing of “civilization” and the perceived threats to what Trump characterizes as “Western civilization.” The language employed within the document reflects a distinctly protectionist sentiment, drawing stark lines around cultural heritage and identity. It criticizes European governments for their immigration policies and positions regarding populist movements, portraying Trump as a guardian of a culturally and racially defined civilization.

This rhetoric marks a departure from the traditional American narrative of promoting liberal democracy and human rights globally. Instead, the NSS suggests that the values Washington seeks to protect are narrowly defined, echoing concerns about the demographic shifts in Europe and the potential dilution of its cultural identity. This perspective can draw uncomfortable parallels with controversial theories around demographic change, though the White House has categorically dismissed any such comparisons as baseless.

An Economic-Centric Foreign Policy

Perhaps the most striking theme in the NSS is its economic focus, which some critics argue overshadows other fundamental values in U.S. foreign relations. The document emphasizes economic statecraft, particularly in terms of reshoring industries, reshaping trade systems, and addressing the economic ascendancy of China. Unlike previous strategies that placed weight on moral imperatives and democratic principles, this NSS centers largely on transactional relationships, assessing foreign engagements and alliances primarily through the lens of economic gain.

There are notable omissions in this document related to strategic threats; for instance, Russia’s ambitions and Taiwan’s significance receive minimal attention beyond their economic implications. Such a transactional focus leads to pressing questions for U.S. allies: Will economic expediency dictate U.S. foreign policy to the detriment of traditional alliances? If a more profitable arrangement with autocratic regimes like Russia or China materializes, where does that leave longstanding partnerships in Europe and Asia?

Conclusion

The U.S. National Security Strategy under the Trump administration illustrates a complex interplay of traditional foreign policy concepts and a distinctive, more isolated vision rooted in protectionism, cultural identity, and economic pragmatism. While rejecting the label of isolationism, the administration has recalibrated its priorities, centering on immediate threats as perceived by the American populace and redefining the terms of global engagement. As allies grapple with these shifts, it remains essential to analyze how these new policies might influence future diplomatic relations and the broader global landscape. The implications of Trump’s approach in the realm of international politics will reverberate long after the administration’s term has ended, as the United States navigates its role in an increasingly interconnected yet fragmented world.

Donald C. Bolduc

 

** Editor’s Note: Thinking about subscribing to SOFREP? You can support Veteran Journalism & do it now for only $1 for your first year. Pull the trigger on this amazing offer HERE. – GDM