News

Morning Brief: AI Power Grid Shift and Norway Military Aid: F-16 Weapons for Ukraine and Arctic Security on Jan Mayen

Federal regulators are moving to let massive AI data centers connect closer to power plants, a fast-track grid shift that could bring reliability. Norway is also stocking the shelves with consequences, funding F-16 munitions and air-defense weapons for Ukraine while tightening security rules on Jan Mayen as the Arctic heats up.

America Just Plugged the Supercomputer Straight Into the Power Plant

Somewhere in Washington, a room full of very serious people unanimously agreed this was a good idea.

Advertisement

Federal energy regulators just approved a plan that lets massive data centers connect directly to power plants. Not metaphorically. Literally. Big cables. Big loads. Big promises that everything will be fine.

Cue the Dubstep Drop

This decision came from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, FERC, which oversees the nation’s bulk power system. They told grid operators like PJM Interconnection, which runs electricity across 13 states and Washington, D.C., to rewrite the rules so gigantic computing facilities can hook up faster and closer to where power is generated.

Advertisement

Why? Because artificial intelligence eats electricity like a teenager eats free pizza, and the grid was not built for that kind of appetite.

Data centers today can demand as much power as a small city. The old process to connect them can take years. Transmission lines are slow, expensive, and full of lawyers. Tech companies do not wait. They build. Regulators are trying to keep up.

Advertisement

So the solution is co-location. Put the data center next to the power plant. Plug the brain directly into the heart, no more ***kin’ around. 

What could possibly go wrong?

To be clear, regulators say this does not mean data centers get free power or special treatment. They still have to pay. They still have to follow reliability rules. They still have to play nice with the grid.

Advertisement

In theory.

In reality, critics are waving red flags big enough to tarp a Ford-class aircraft carrier. When one customer pulls hundreds of megawatts, small mistakes stop being small. If infrastructure upgrades are needed, somebody eats the cost. History says that somebody is usually the ratepayer.

There is also the legal knife fight. States traditionally regulate retail electricity. Federal agencies regulate interstate markets. These new hookups blur that line. Lawsuits are already warming up in the bullpen. Supporters argue this is about national security. AI is not a toy anymore. It is infrastructure. Whoever powers it fastest gets the advantage. From that angle, slowing down to be cautious looks like losing. That argument plays well in Washington. Speed always does. The problem is that every major infrastructure disaster starts the same way. Smart people. Good intentions. Tight deadlines. Assurances that safeguards exist. Then a rare event happens. Then two systems interact in a way nobody modeled. Then everyone asks how this slipped through. Nobody is saying machines are taking over. Nobody is claiming regulators are villains. This is not about evil plans. It is about pressure, optimism, and complexity colliding at high speed. We are rewiring the grid on the fly to feed unprecedented computing power because stopping is not an option. That approach usually works. Right up until it doesn’t. Hey… when have we ever armed someone who later turned out to be our enemy? Mujahideen anyone? Fade out. Guitar solo. End scene.   Classic shot of an iconic aircraft. Image Credit: wallpapercave.com Norway Just Went Shopping for Violence on Ukraine’s Behalf Norway just went shopping for violence on Ukraine’s behalf, and they did not browse. Oslo dropped roughly 3.2 billion Norwegian kroner on weapons meant to ruin Russia’s day, starting with F-16 ammunition and laser-guided missiles to keep Ukraine’s Vipers fed and dangerous. The package also funds air-defense interceptors, including missiles for Ukraine’s S-300 systems, plus a precision upgrade that turns cheaper rockets into guided “nope.” This is not spare parts or feel-good aid. This is stocking the shelves with consequences. The announcement comes as Ukraine continues integrating Western fighter jets into a war that has become increasingly about who controls the air and who survives the missile strikes that follow. Norway is not sending jets. It is sending what jets actually need to work. Ammo. Guidance. Interceptors. The unsexy stuff that decides outcomes. Just over 1 billion kroner of the package is earmarked specifically for ammunition for F-16 fighter aircraft. Norwegian officials also confirmed funding for laser-guided missiles, though they did not publish a shopping list of exact types. That omission is intentional. Governments like flexibility. Russia likes guessing. Translation for the non-aviation crowd: fighter jets without weapons are just loud sightseeing tours. Norway is buying Ukraine the part that makes F-16s relevant. Another 500 million kroner plus is going toward missiles for Ukraine’s S-300 air-defense systems. These are legacy Soviet-era systems, but they still knock Russian missiles and aircraft out of the sky when fed properly. Call it roof insurance. Call it the “not today” umbrella. Either way, it keeps civilians alive and infrastructure standing. The package also includes funding for what Norway describes as an advanced precision weapons system, designed to convert lower-cost rockets into precision-guided munitions usable by aircraft or ground-based air defense. In plain terms, this takes dumb rockets and gives them a brain. Misses get expensive. Hits get cheaper. All of this money is flowing through the U.S.-run JUMPSTART mechanism, which uses the Foreign Military Sales system. Norway provides the cash, the U.S. procurement machine handles the buying, and Ukraine gets the weapons faster than if everyone tried to reinvent the process. It is not flashy. It works. This funding falls under Norway’s long-term Nansen Support Programme, which prioritizes airpower and air defense as Russia continues to lean hard on missile and drone strikes. Oslo’s message is simple. Ukraine’s air war needs to stay funded, supplied, and lethal. Russia will not be thrilled. That is not a side effect. That is the point. Norway is not escalating rhetoric. It is escalating capability. And in a war where airpower decides who gets hit and who gets home, stocking the shelves with consequences is a very deliberate move.   A meteorological station on the Norwegian island of Jan Mayen in the Arctic Sea. Image Credit: Heiko Junge/AFP via Getty Images Norway Is Tightening Its Grip on Jan Mayen, and Somebody’s Going to Freeze for It The news out of Oslo sounds clean and reasonable on paper. Norway’s defense ministry has floated a proposal to extend military police authority to Jan Mayen, a remote volcanic island in the North Atlantic. The goal is better security, clearer legal authority, and preparation for a more crowded and contested Arctic. The translation at ground level is simpler. More military presence. More responsibility. More time freezing your steiners off on a rock most people can’t find on a map. Under the draft proposal, Jan Mayen would be explicitly covered by Norway’s Military Police Act. That would allow the station commander, already a Norwegian Armed Forces officer, to declare parts of the island a military area and use military police powers to control access, enforce the law, and deal with security incidents. For policymakers, this closes a legal gap. For soldiers, it means Jan Mayen is no longer just a weather station with a flag. It is officially a place that matters enough to guard properly. Jan Mayen sits about 500 kilometers east of Greenland. There is no permanent civilian population. There is a small rotating military and civilian presence, a meteorological station, the Jan Mayensfield airstrip, and communications infrastructure. Recently, Norway laid a new undersea fiber-optic cable linking the mainland to Jan Mayen and Svalbard. That cable is critical infrastructure, and critical infrastructure attracts attention. Norway says the move reflects a more uncertain security environment in the High North and the likelihood of increased Norwegian and allied activity in the Arctic. Russia has already shown interest in the region and has previously complained about U.S. military visits to Jan Mayen. The Arctic is quiet right up until it isn’t. From the soldier’s point of view, this announcement answers one question and raises another. The “why” is clear. Somebody needs to be there. Somebody needs legal authority to act if something strange happens. Somebody needs to make sure cables stay intact, airspace stays controlled, and nobody treats an empty island like an invitation. The “how” is where reality sets in. Jan Mayen is cold, isolated, and unforgiving. The wind doesn’t care about strategy documents. Darkness doesn’t care about deterrence. If Norway increases its military footprint, that footprint belongs to real people standing watch, maintaining equipment, and operating in conditions that punish mistakes. This is not about building a fortress. It is about making sure a gap does not exist. Soldiers understand that logic. Empty spaces attract interest. Guarded ones attract caution. So when Oslo talks about authority and security, the soldier hears something else. Longer rotations. More responsibility. More time on a frozen rock making sure nothing happens. That is how Arctic defense works. Quiet. Boring. Miserable. And very deliberate. Someone will be freezing their steiners off on Jan Mayen because Norway said so.   — ** Editor’s Note: Thinking about subscribing to SOFREP? You can support Veteran Journalism & do it now for only $1 for your first year. Pull the trigger on this amazing offer HERE. Act fast, time is running out.– GDM
Advertisement

You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.