In a recent and unexpected development, the U.S. Navy has relieved Cmdr. Sarah M. Quemada from her position as the commanding officer of the Naval Information Warfare Training Group (NIWTG) Norfolk. This decision, effective January 16, 2025, was attributed to a “loss of confidence in her ability to command,” as stated by Rear Adm. Brian A. Harding, commander of the Naval Information Warfighting Development Center.

The Navy is on quite a roll, with no fewer than 18 high-ranking officers being relieved of their duties in the past 12 months.

Naval Training Group CDR

A Brief Tenure at NIWTG Norfolk

According to Navy Times, Cmdr. Sarah M. Quemada’s time as the commanding officer of Naval Information Warfare Training Group (NIWTG) Norfolk was relatively short. She took on the role in June 2023, but her tenure ended abruptly on January 16, 2025. Rear Adm. Brian A. Harding, commander of Naval Information Warfighting Development Center, relieved Quemada of her duties, citing a “loss of confidence in her ability to command.” This phrase is commonly used by the Navy in such situations but typically does not include specific details about the reasons behind the decision.

Following her removal, Quemada was temporarily reassigned to Naval Information Forces. To maintain continuity, Capt. Steve McIntire was appointed as the interim commanding officer of NIWTG Norfolk until a permanent replacement is selected. Quemada served in the role for about 19 months, overseeing efforts to strengthen the fleet’s information warfare readiness through operational training and the management of mission-critical data for both afloat and shore-based commands.

Her previous assignments included roles such as the assistant branch chief to Cyber Pursuit and Exploitation at the NSA/CSS Threat Operations Center in Hawaii and officer-in-charge for Cryptologic Warfare Group SIX Detachment in Digby.

The Navy’s Stance on Leadership Accountability

The Navy’s decision to relieve Cmdr. Quemada underscores its unwavering commitment to maintaining high standards among its commanding officers. Given the 18 commanders relieved of duty in the past 12 months, one can’t help but wonder if they can’t be doing a better job in vetting candidates for high-profile, high-responsibility positions. 

In the official statement, the Navy emphasized that it “maintains the highest standards for commanding officers and holds them accountable when those standards are not met.”