News

Evening Brief: Israeli Forces Kill 67 in Gaza, Lawmakers Want to Unmask ICE Agents

BY Guy D. McCardle

As Israeli troops reportedly gunned down starving civilians in a Gaza breadline, ICE agents fought to keep their faces hidden from the American public, and Ukrainian drones forced Moscow to shut its skies ten times in a day, the message was painfully clear: in a world ruled by power plays and paranoia, it’s always the innocent who get trampled first. And that’s our world on Sunday, July 20, 2025. This is your evening brief.

When elected officials start quoting freezer instructions—'MELT ICE' and 'UNMASK ICE'—you know the bureaucracy’s got a branding problem. Image Credit: Politico

On Sunday, July 20, Israeli forces opened fire on a crowd of Palestinians gathered near the Zikim border crossing in northern Gaza, killing at least 67 people and wounding over 150 more, according to reports from the Gaza Health Ministry, local hospitals, and corroborating international outlets. The victims weren’t militants or fighters—they were civilians, many of them starving and desperate, waiting for food aid from U.N. trucks operated by the World Food Program.

Advertisement

As the aid convoy approached, thousands of people had assembled, trying to secure basic staples to survive in a war zone that’s been cut off from nearly everything. Eyewitnesses say that gunfire, and possibly tank shells, suddenly erupted. Chaos followed. Bodies fell. Those still standing tried to drag the wounded to safety while field medics scrambled to help—until they, too, were overwhelmed. Makeshift clinics couldn’t handle the volume of injuries. The dead lay among torn plastic bags meant for carrying rice and flour.

The Israel Defense Forces later admitted their troops had fired in the area but claimed they were targeting what they called an “immediate threat.” They didn’t specify what that threat was, though they did question the casualty figures reported by Gaza officials. But independent international news agencies on the ground verified that the death toll exceeded 60. And those survivors weren’t holding weapons—they were clutching containers and ration cards.

This is just the latest in a grim pattern: civilians in Gaza being killed while trying to get food. The region has been slowly starved under ongoing military operations and border restrictions. To make matters worse, Israel has now issued new evacuation orders for central Gaza, pushing displaced families even farther from where limited aid might arrive.

Advertisement

The U.N. World Food Program called the attack “completely unacceptable.” Other humanitarian groups echoed the outrage, insisting that targeting civilians trying to survive is a red line that’s been crossed too many times.

One thing’s clear—this wasn’t a battlefield. It was a breadline.

Advertisement

 

Lawmakers Want ICE Agents to Take Off the Masks

A growing number of lawmakers across the country want to strip the masks off Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Why? Because they believe federal agents should be clearly identifiable when they’re on the job—especially when that job involves arresting people in America’s neighborhoods. The push is about transparency, accountability, and stopping what some see as fear tactics that look more like paramilitary operations than law enforcement.

In Massachusetts, Representative Jim Hawkins filed a bill that would ban any law enforcement officer, including ICE, from wearing face coverings while out in public doing their duties. The only exceptions? Medical masks or SWAT operations. Anyone breaking the rule could face a misdemeanor charge. In California, Senator Scott Wiener put forward a similar measure. His concern: masked agents showing up at homes and businesses are scaring the hell out of people. It’s hard to tell if they’re cops, vigilantes, or something worse.

Over in Washington, Representative Nydia Velázquez took it to the federal level with the “No Masks for ICE Act,” which would prevent agents from wearing masks when interacting with the public. Other Democrats in Congress are backing similar efforts. Meanwhile, cities and states from New York to California are considering local bans, trying to get ahead of what they see as federal overreach wrapped in a black balaclava.

Supporters of these laws say it’s simple: if you’re enforcing the law, the public should know who you are. Police officers don’t typically hide their faces—even when they’re arresting dangerous criminals. So why should ICE agents get to play dress-up when they’re serving papers or picking people up for immigration violations?

ICE doesn’t see it that way. Officials argue that agents have become prime targets for threats, harassment, and online attacks—especially in politically charged areas. They say the masks help protect identities and families from being doxxed or worse. With tensions around immigration already sky-high, ICE claims the safety of its personnel has to come first.

There’s another wrinkle here—the legal fight. Can states really tell federal agents how to operate? That’s a constitutional question that could land in the Supreme Court. The last time we saw this kind of anti-mask legislation was decades ago, aimed at groups like the Ku Klux Klan. But those laws were never meant to rein in federal agents.

As of July 2025, none of these proposals have become law, but they’re moving through legislatures in several states. It’s shaping up to be a showdown between local transparency and federal muscle. And if the bills pass, ICE may have no choice but to show its face.

 

Ukrainian Drone Barrage Shuts Down Moscow Airports, Strands 60,000 Travelers

In the early hours of July 19 and stretching into the next day, Ukraine launched what Russian officials are calling their biggest drone assault to date—and it sent Moscow into a tailspin. The skies over the Russian capital lit up as more than 230 Ukrainian drones were reportedly intercepted across the country, dozens of them aimed squarely at Moscow. The onslaught was so relentless that all four of the city’s major airports were shut down and reopened ten times in 24 hours. That’s not a typo—ten times. The constant threat forced Russian air traffic controllers into a round-the-clock game of aerial whack-a-mole.

At least 140 flights were canceled outright. Thousands more were diverted, mostly to Pulkovo Airport in St. Petersburg. The end result? Roughly 60,000 passengers left stranded, parked in terminals, sitting on the tarmac, or rerouted hundreds of miles from their original destinations. Fires reportedly broke out in areas like Zelenograd, northwest of downtown Moscow, after some drones slipped through and hit targets on the ground.

Russian air defenses were clearly overwhelmed. As soon as the skies were declared safe, another wave of drones would come in, forcing another lockdown. It wasn’t until 4 a.m. on July 20 that Moscow’s airports resumed regular operations—at least for now.

This latest strike marks the fourth straight night of Ukrainian drone attacks on the capital and signals a serious escalation in Kyiv’s long-range capabilities. It’s no longer just the front lines seeing action—Russia’s heartland is getting hit, and Moscow’s vulnerability is on full display.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisement

What readers are saying

Generating a quick summary of the conversation...

This summary is AI-generated. AI can make mistakes and this summary is not a replacement for reading the comments.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR