The Bolduc Brief: Misunderstanding and Misuse – The Phrases “Live Free or Die” and “Peace Through Strength”

The phrases “Live Free or Die” and “Peace Through Strength” have become emblematic of certain American values, but their meanings have often been misconstrued or co-opted for political agendas. While these phrases carry significant historical weight and philosophical depth, their frequent use in contemporary discourse can diminish their original intent and purpose.

“Live Free or Die”

Adopted as the New Hampshire state motto, “Live Free or Die” originated from a speech by General John Stark after his experiences in the Revolutionary War. This phrase encapsulates the ideals of liberty, courage, and the profound sacrifices made in the pursuit of freedom. Stark’s intention was to emphasize the value of independence and the costs associated with maintaining it, particularly in the context of fighting against oppression.

However, in modern usage, “Live Free or Die” has often been appropriated to support various political ideologies and economic policies, sometimes to the point where its foundational principles are obscured. The phrase can be misused to promote an extreme doctrine of personal freedom at the expense of collective responsibility or social cohesion. Stark’s message advocated for liberty but was not a blanket endorsement of an individualistic ethos devoid of community or moral obligation. By wielding this phrase as a political weapon, the true essence of the struggle for freedom is lost, and its historical context is ignored.

“Peace Through Strength”

Similarly, “Peace Through Strength,” a phrase popularized by President Ronald Reagan during the Cold War, was intended to convey the notion that national strength—military and otherwise—can deter aggression and maintain peace. The philosophy behind this phrase centers on the belief that a robust defense posture can prevent conflicts and promote stability by dissuading potential aggressors from engaging in hostile actions.

However, the interpretation of “Peace Through Strength” has shifted over time. It is increasingly used to justify aggressive military posturing or interventions under the guise of maintaining peace. The phrase can be manipulated to promote a worldview that equates peace solely with military might, neglecting the nuanced leadership, strategic diplomacy, and international cooperation that are essential in cultivating true peace. The effectiveness of this strategy is contingent upon how a nation’s strength is perceived by others—emphasizing that displaying force must be coupled with a commitment to constructive dialogue and mutual respect between nations.

Undermining the Original Purpose

Both phrases, when utilized as political weapons or threats, undermine their core messages and dilute their historical significance. Reducing “Live Free or Die” to a chant for individualism or using “Peace Through Strength” as a pretext for military aggression strips these slogans of their substance, reducing profound concepts into mere slogans for partisan agendas.

In a time when polarized political rhetoric dominates discourse, it is crucial to revisit the historical roots and original intentions behind these phrases. By doing so, we can foster a more respectful dialogue that honors the legacies of those who articulated these ideas. Understanding their complexity allows for a deeper appreciation of freedom and peace—principles that deserve to be championed, not weaponized. It is essential to approach these phrases with the nuance they warrant, recognizing that true liberty and lasting peace require more than mere declarations; they demand thoughtful action and a commitment to the greater good.

Donald C. Bolduc