The following piece, written by Julian Nettlefold, first appeared on Warrior Maven, a Military Content Group member website.

 

Reports emanating from Ukraine demonstrate the effectiveness of current 30mm canon systems against Russian armored personnel carriers (APCs) and the BMP-4 in particular. This puts a big question mark on the threat analysis conducted in the 1990s, which saw a need for 40mm and the CT-40 canon, in particular, to defeat the BMP-4. Has the decision by the US to go for 50mm in 2020 also been found wanting?

The Argument for 40mm

So, how does CTA technology allow the CT-40 cannon to perform above its competition? Due to the nature of telescoped ammunition, CTA ammunition has 30 percent more performance for the same volume of ammunition. This can be seen in a comparison of the size of the rounds: forty-millimeter CT ammunition is only the size of conventional thirty-millimeter ammunition while delivering performance on par with conventional forty-millimeter rounds.

Talking in numbers, the forty-millimeter CT armor-piercing round can pierce 150 millimeters of armor at 1.5 kilometers. This is sufficient performance to defeat any current BMP-series IFV and their upgrades. This is superior to the hundred millimeter-plus RHA at one kilometer offered by the 30×173-millimeter rounds used by the latest versions of the US Army’s thirty-millimeter Stryker.

The airburst capability of the forty-millimeter CT rounds is also superior, more than doubling the affected area versus thirty-millimeter rounds. All of this comes in a package that is around the same size and bulk as the thirty-millimeter cannons. The CT-40 cannon can also hold more rounds in the ready position, around a hundred ready rounds, compared to the twenty-four to twenty-five ready rounds that are possible with the Swedish forty-millimeter L/70 cannon on the CV9040, as reported by Janes.