Leadership is a multifaceted skill, particularly in the realm of international relations where actions and words resonate far beyond the immediate context. One of the cardinal lessons for senior leaders is to “admonish in private and praise in public.” This principle underscores the importance of maintaining dignity and decorum in diplomatic engagements. When leaders violate this tenet, as was the case with President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance during their infamous Oval Office meeting with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, the consequences can be far-reaching and detrimental.

The meeting in question not only exhibited a lack of professionalism but also represented a missed opportunity for the United States to express unwavering support for Ukraine amidst ongoing aggression from Russia. Instead of fortifying alliances and demonstrating solidarity with a nation that has stood resilient against tyranny, Trump and Vance’s behavior bordered on the undiplomatic and the disrespectful. This conduct serves to embolden adversaries such as Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran, who take note of the fractures in U.S. leadership and willfully exploit any signs of weakness.

The Ukrainian people, led by their President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, are not the antagonists in this global narrative; rather, they are the courageous defenders of their sovereignty. Their fight against Vladimir Putin and the looming specter of Russian imperialism represents a struggle that is deeply intertwined with the values that the West purports to uphold: freedom, sovereignty, and democracy. Zelenskyy has consistently displayed gratitude for the support he has received from Western allies, a loyalty that underscores his commitment to these fundamental principles.

In contrast, the actions in the Oval Office did not reflect the necessary support and respect that a leader of a nation under siege deserves. Such a lack of decorum not only alienates allies but also emboldens adversaries. Putin’s ambitions to resurrect the Soviet Union and extend his grasp over neighboring territories must be met with clarity and strength, something that should be a priority for U.S. leadership. The mixed signals sent by Trump and Vance, instead of reinforcing America’s national security stance, have instead weakened it.

The backlash against their behavior should prompt reflection and recalibration in U.S. foreign policy. The art of diplomacy requires more than mere transactional relationships; it necessitates a foundation built on mutual respect and support. As senior leaders navigate the complexities of global politics, it is crucial to remember that the manner in which they interact with international partners can have profound implications for global stability.

In conclusion, the lesson reiterated through the incident involving President Trump, Vice President Vance, and President Zelenskyy is clear: powerful leaders must uphold the values of professionalism and respect in all diplomatic engagements. By doing so, they not only bolster their nation’s credibility on the world stage but also contribute to a more stable and secure international order. The actions taken today will shape the world of tomorrow; it is imperative that U.S. leaders choose to empower allies rather than diminish them.

Donald C. Bolduc