Photo from the 2022 NATO Summit in Madrid. Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons
The drama of the recent NATO summit and the even more dramatic and sickening assassination attempt of a former president is a reminder of the chaos that surrounds all of us. In these trying times, we count on protective rings of domestic and international policy and alliances to strengthen, stabilize, and reassure the American people. Any call for the United States to leave the United Nations or NATO is inherently shortsighted, almost certainly politically motivated, and puts America and our values at risk. The necessity for enduring alliances based on common goals and a common vision for the future has never been more relevant and necessary. It only takes a cursory look at the failing Russian offensive in Ukraine, an isolated North Korea, and the weakened and spiraling Iranian regime to understand how effective NATO and other alliances have been.
These alliances continue to provide critical protection to vulnerable countries – that arguably includes the United States. With the turmoil and unrest caused by domestic politics, real and perceived social injustices, natural disasters, and now an attempt by a former president while the current president suffers from the inevitable curse of time, our alliances provide another layer of security to every American. These alliances are a reminder and a prompt to any foreign power that America does not stand alone.
The past four years have brought a sustained period of economic and political instability combined with unrelenting social and cultural strife. All the while, domestic politics remains at historic levels of distrust, divisiveness, and dysfunction. This merging of politics, economics, culture, and religion has created dangerously mixed messages not only to the American public but also to members of our alliances and other long-standing allies. These same messages are received by our enemies as seams, as divisions—as weakness.
Whether attributed to ancient parables, to Voltaire, or Winston Churchill, “with great power comes great responsibility” rings true when describing the nature of America’s global leadership position. We need mature and stable leadership to be the norm while demanding a disciplined approach with every ally. This includes our publicly elected and appointed officials – presidents, members of Congress, and diplomats – who should not routinely express their personal opinions. Every time these officials threaten our allies with unilateral economic or military sanctions or threats to abandon alliances, we further erode their trust.
Rumors the United States can or will step back from its commitments to NATO or to the United Nations have been echoed from Pennsylvania Avenue to the streets of New York City and Brussels – those voices should be challenged. With mixed messages being sent to Ukraine and Israel, we play into the hands of our enemies while undermining more than one hundred years of American credibility. Leadership and respect are two-way streets, and both come with a price and a commitment. Those who espouse the United States and depart from long-standing alliances should be studied, and their intentions should be analyzed; it leaves every American vulnerable. Vulnerable to interests and powers who fear freedom, who fear choice, and who tremble at the ideals of democracy. For dictators, despots, and autocrats alike, democracy signals the end of their regimes. The power brokers in Iran, Russia, North Korea, and China have spent lifetimes consolidating their power and suppressing both their enemies and their citizens – democratic alliances threaten them.
The United States has engaged in international diplomacy and entered alliances that predate the nation. The American Revolution pushed the colonies into the first of a series of intertwined relationships between the United States and the European powers. The 1778 Treaties of Alliance between the newly formed United States and France solidified a crucial economic and military partnership. Though the French Revolution would be more than a decade away, the impact of that treaty and the impact of American democracy are still being realized today throughout the world.
Post-revolution, the United States hesitantly moved to expand trade relationships – understanding that military and diplomatic treaties were fraught with risk but necessary. Alliances have and remain a dangerous and sometimes unsettling compromise, understandably trading advantages for disadvantages – and the nation’s first president knew it. President George Washington encouraged Americans to avoid foreign entanglements; it stemmed from his personal experiences while in office. Washington understood how expensive, in national treasure, war is. Washington, as pragmatic and reflective as he was, saw neutrality as the best way to keep the nation from future wars.
The drama of the recent NATO summit and the even more dramatic and sickening assassination attempt of a former president is a reminder of the chaos that surrounds all of us. In these trying times, we count on protective rings of domestic and international policy and alliances to strengthen, stabilize, and reassure the American people. Any call for the United States to leave the United Nations or NATO is inherently shortsighted, almost certainly politically motivated, and puts America and our values at risk. The necessity for enduring alliances based on common goals and a common vision for the future has never been more relevant and necessary. It only takes a cursory look at the failing Russian offensive in Ukraine, an isolated North Korea, and the weakened and spiraling Iranian regime to understand how effective NATO and other alliances have been.
These alliances continue to provide critical protection to vulnerable countries – that arguably includes the United States. With the turmoil and unrest caused by domestic politics, real and perceived social injustices, natural disasters, and now an attempt by a former president while the current president suffers from the inevitable curse of time, our alliances provide another layer of security to every American. These alliances are a reminder and a prompt to any foreign power that America does not stand alone.
The past four years have brought a sustained period of economic and political instability combined with unrelenting social and cultural strife. All the while, domestic politics remains at historic levels of distrust, divisiveness, and dysfunction. This merging of politics, economics, culture, and religion has created dangerously mixed messages not only to the American public but also to members of our alliances and other long-standing allies. These same messages are received by our enemies as seams, as divisions—as weakness.
Whether attributed to ancient parables, to Voltaire, or Winston Churchill, “with great power comes great responsibility” rings true when describing the nature of America’s global leadership position. We need mature and stable leadership to be the norm while demanding a disciplined approach with every ally. This includes our publicly elected and appointed officials – presidents, members of Congress, and diplomats – who should not routinely express their personal opinions. Every time these officials threaten our allies with unilateral economic or military sanctions or threats to abandon alliances, we further erode their trust.
Rumors the United States can or will step back from its commitments to NATO or to the United Nations have been echoed from Pennsylvania Avenue to the streets of New York City and Brussels – those voices should be challenged. With mixed messages being sent to Ukraine and Israel, we play into the hands of our enemies while undermining more than one hundred years of American credibility. Leadership and respect are two-way streets, and both come with a price and a commitment. Those who espouse the United States and depart from long-standing alliances should be studied, and their intentions should be analyzed; it leaves every American vulnerable. Vulnerable to interests and powers who fear freedom, who fear choice, and who tremble at the ideals of democracy. For dictators, despots, and autocrats alike, democracy signals the end of their regimes. The power brokers in Iran, Russia, North Korea, and China have spent lifetimes consolidating their power and suppressing both their enemies and their citizens – democratic alliances threaten them.
The United States has engaged in international diplomacy and entered alliances that predate the nation. The American Revolution pushed the colonies into the first of a series of intertwined relationships between the United States and the European powers. The 1778 Treaties of Alliance between the newly formed United States and France solidified a crucial economic and military partnership. Though the French Revolution would be more than a decade away, the impact of that treaty and the impact of American democracy are still being realized today throughout the world.
Post-revolution, the United States hesitantly moved to expand trade relationships – understanding that military and diplomatic treaties were fraught with risk but necessary. Alliances have and remain a dangerous and sometimes unsettling compromise, understandably trading advantages for disadvantages – and the nation’s first president knew it. President George Washington encouraged Americans to avoid foreign entanglements; it stemmed from his personal experiences while in office. Washington understood how expensive, in national treasure, war is. Washington, as pragmatic and reflective as he was, saw neutrality as the best way to keep the nation from future wars.
“Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice?”
Washington intended for the United States to honor all existing international treaties but warned future generations of the dangers of permanent alliances with the “foreign world.” Even Washington could never have imagined how quickly the world would change.
As the First World War concluded, there was pressure in Europe and North America not to repeat what could only have been viewed as an apocalyptic war: forty million deaths at the hands of the Industrial Revolution’s newest and most deadly weapons. With the Paris Peace Conference came demands to prevent political conflicts from escalating to armed conflicts. The League of Nations was formed in 1920 to ensure diplomacy and other tools were available to mitigate and resolve political disputes. The league was effective in increasing global communication and collaboration, and though rendered obsolete by 1943, it paved the way for both the United Nations and NATO.
More specifically, NATO was designed for a post-war Europe that included a more prominent role for the United States. By the summer of 1941, the London Declaration led to the Atlantic Charter and finally to a charter that would outline a post-war world and NATO. The Second World War highlighted a need for both effective and enduring alliances for the Allied powers. The United States, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom formed the “Big 3.” – it was a forced alliance designed to counter Germany, Italy, and Japan. Though the Big Three were successful in ending the war, Russia was threatened by American and European democracies and quickly moved to consolidate its place in a post-war world. The threats of a hyper-aggressive and nuclear Russia simultaneously pushed the remaining allies into creating and joining NATO, a fundamentally anti-Soviet defensive position – creating a four-decade “Cold War.”
What made NATO so impactful for Europe was its ability to counter Russia’s post-war dominance. Russia’s massive land grabs created both the Soviet Union and its “Iron Curtain.” This left most of Europe exposed and NATO as their best option. What makes NATO so unique, for the thirty-two current members, is their goal of both peaceful coexistence and military security. Core to NATO’s efficacy is Article 5 – which considers an attack on one member as an attack on all. The promise of collective defense is powerful – the reason that NATO remains the longest-standing alliance of its kind.
The requisite 2% “donation” of gross domestic product, or GDP, to NATO by each member has been a point of friction for decades. This has only become more glaring as the war in Afghanistan and NATO’s global presence has become more burdensome for the United States and other major contributors. Financial contributions should not threaten America or any other member’s position within the alliance. There are skills and capacities NATO members can provide along with financial contributions. These may include access to air bases, training facilities, naval ports, technology exchanges, or other specific military capabilities. NATO democratic values and promises of security have also brought fifteen former Soviet Union satellite countries into the alliance; fifteen former Soviet satellites are now contributing to NATO. Most recently, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine pushed both Sweden and Finland into the alliance – more strength in numbers.
Russia, North Korea, Iran, and China all envy what the NATO standard is. Russia remains alienated, and the Russian president seeks any alliance possible to preserve the regime. This includes a starving and desperate North Korea, with whom they have no cultural, religious, or ethnic ties. Their relationship is a simple “guns for money or oil for missiles” relationship. North Korea recently hosted the Russian president and openly chastised South Korea and Japan for creating an “Asian NATO” – a high compliment.
With the election cycle long underway, the United States’ support of our alliances should be at the forefront of our foreign policy debates. This includes reconfirming our commitments to those same alliances while avoiding destructive rhetoric. With the war in Ukraine still raging and Iranian proxies still engaging Israeli, US, and allied forces in the Middle East, this is no time to abandon our allies. With the disastrous abandonment of Afghanistan still fresh in our minds, this is the time for the United States to show the leadership, stamina, vision, and patience needed to preserve our strategic alliances.
—
Disclaimer: SOFREP utilizes AI for image generation and article research. Occasionally, it’s like handing a chimpanzee the keys to your liquor cabinet. It’s not always perfect and if a mistake is made, we own up to it full stop. In a world where information comes at us in tidal waves, it is an important tool that helps us sift through the brass for live rounds.
As someone who’s seen what happens when the truth is distorted, I know how unfair it feels when those who’ve sacrificed the most lose their voice. At SOFREP, our veteran journalists, who once fought for freedom, now fight to bring you unfiltered, real-world intel. But without your support, we risk losing this vital source of truth. By subscribing, you’re not just leveling the playing field—you’re standing with those who’ve already given so much, ensuring they continue to serve by delivering stories that matter. Every subscription means we can hire more veterans and keep their hard-earned knowledge in the fight. Don’t let their voices be silenced. Please consider subscribing now.
One team, one fight,
Brandon Webb former Navy SEAL, Bestselling Author and Editor-in-Chief
Barrett is the world leader in long-range, large-caliber, precision rifle design and manufacturing. Barrett products are used by civilians, sport shooters, law enforcement agencies, the United States military, and more than 75 State Department-approved countries around the world.
PO Box 1077 MURFREESBORO, Tennessee 37133 United States
Scrubba Wash Bag
Our ultra-portable washing machine makes your journey easier. This convenient, pocket-sized travel companion allows you to travel lighter while helping you save money, time and water.
Our roots in shooting sports started off back in 1996 with our founder and CEO, Josh Ungier. His love of airguns took hold of our company from day one and we became the first e-commerce retailer dedicated to airguns, optics, ammo, and accessories. Over the next 25 years, customers turned to us for our unmatched product selection, great advice, education, and continued support of the sport and airgun industry.
COMMENTS
There are
on this article.
You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.