Now that the suppressor provisions have been stripped out or will need major reworking to pass, Republicans will need to find another legislative path. And without the 60 votes needed to clear a filibuster, that road just got a lot bumpier.
You’re getting about 30-40 dB SPL attenuation with suppressors and these firearms can be putting out up to 170 dB SPL of impulse noise (insanely loud). The primary use case for suppressors is hearing conservation; they should not be regulated. https://t.co/sgxWI2kVaT pic.twitter.com/QiuBXHDwl4
— Badplus (@badplus017) June 26, 2025
Air Force Fast-Tracks Retirement of A-10 Warthog Fleet
The U.S. Air Force is pulling the plug on the A-10 Thunderbolt II fleet a lot faster than anyone expected. Under the proposed 2026 defense budget, every one of the 162 remaining A-10s will be retired by the end of fiscal year 2026—a full two years ahead of schedule. It’s part of a sweeping plan to retire 340 aircraft total, making this the largest aircraft drawdown the service has seen in years.
To fund the early exit, the Air Force is asking for $57 million in the upcoming budget. The process is already underway in places like South Korea, where the 25th Fighter Squadron at Osan Air Base began pulling its 24 A-10s starting in January 2025. The full drawdown there should wrap up by the end of fiscal 2025.
Why the sudden push to retire one of the most beloved aircraft in the Air Force? Officials say the A-10, built for Cold War-era tank busting in the 1970s, just can’t cut it in the face of modern air defense systems. The brass argue that with today’s threats and tomorrow’s wars in mind, it’s smarter to invest in newer, more versatile aircraft like the F-35, F-15EX, and upgraded F-16s. The A-10’s narrow focus on close air support doesn’t fit the modern playbook of multi-domain, high-tech warfare.
But here’s the catch: Congress has to sign off on the whole thing, and that’s where things could get messy. While lawmakers have recently been more willing to allow some A-10 retirements, a full fleet shutdown is still controversial. Many in Congress, the military, and especially the veteran community argue that no aircraft matches the A-10’s sheer effectiveness at protecting troops on the ground. The concern is that no matter how advanced the F-35 or F-15EX may be, they aren’t built to fly low and slow, loiter over the battlefield, and bring the pain with the same grit and reliability as the Warthog.
In the end, there’s no one-for-one replacement for the A-10. The Air Force is betting on newer jets and better tech to fill the void. Whether that gamble pays off—or leaves ground troops without the kind of cover they’ve relied on for decades—remains to be seen. Either way, it’s clear that the end of the A-10 era is coming fast, and with it, the close of one of the most iconic chapters in American airpower.
US Air Force seeks to retire all A-10 Warthogs by 2027 https://t.co/1FHjfaT52b pic.twitter.com/yodNJPJj1P
— FlightGlobal (@FlightGlobal) June 26, 2025
Israel Hits Southern Lebanon in Escalating Clash with Hezbollah
On June 27, 2025, the Israeli military carried out a wave of heavy airstrikes in southern Lebanon, zeroing in on high ground near the city of Nabatieh. According to the IDF, the strikes targeted an underground Hezbollah facility used for what they called “fire and defense operations.” Israeli officials claim Hezbollah was trying to bring the site back online, which they say violates the U.S.-brokered ceasefire that’s been in place since November 2024.
The strikes sparked serious controversy. Lebanese authorities reported that a residential building in Nabatieh was hit, killing at least one woman and injuring more than a dozen others. Israel insists they didn’t directly target any civilian structures and blamed the explosion on a Hezbollah rocket that detonated after being struck in the air raid.
Footage on social media showed large explosions and smoke pouring from the area, backing up reports of major damage. Lebanese President Joseph Aoun wasted no time condemning the strikes, accusing Israel of routinely breaching the ceasefire. He pointed to Israel’s continued military presence in Lebanon and the uptick in airstrikes as clear violations of the agreement.
This isn’t a one-off incident either. Throughout June, Israel has ramped up its attacks in Lebanon, hitting Hezbollah targets like drone factories and weapons caches—not only in the south but even in parts of Beirut. These operations have killed a number of Hezbollah members, and in some cases, civilians have been caught in the crossfire.
Both sides are pointing fingers. Israel says Hezbollah is the one breaking the deal by rebuilding its military network. Meanwhile, Lebanese officials argue that Israel never really pulled back and continues to operate inside Lebanese territory.
Bottom line: the ceasefire is hanging by a thread. Israel is turning up the heat on Hezbollah, and the collateral damage is piling up. With each strike and counter-claim, the risk of full-blown escalation gets higher—and the region inches closer to another major flare-up.
‼️🇮🇱🇱🇧Israel strikes Lebanon
▪️The published footage shows an Israeli air force attack on southern Lebanon. The strikes are reportedly targeting Hezbollah.
▪️Lebanese media reports that a residential area in the city of Nabatieh was also hit by rocket fire. pic.twitter.com/yLJhpz3H9w
— 𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺 🇷🇺 (@SMO_VZ) June 27, 2025








COMMENTS