Warning, strong opinions expressed.

Putting solid leadership and policy in place across American police departments seems like a good idea, rather than blanket defunding or taking away law enforcement’s right to serve and protect the public.

I also believe in equality, and that one can support the movement of BLM and still support good first responders, military and police. The two are not mutually exclusive.

As the economist Roland Fryer states in his analysis of the use of force by police, the system is clearly biased against Blacks and Hispanics when it comes to the use of force and this needs to be fixed. “On non-lethal uses of force, blacks and Hispanics are more than fifty percent more likely to experience some form of force in interactions with police,” Fryer says.

I would go a step further: Based on my experience with the police, both in having been behind bars and having trained them, I can say that the law enforcement system as a whole needs fundamental change in how it looks at the use of force. It also needs standardization of tactics. LAPD does things differently than NYPD and so on, and so on. Police would be wise to put aside departmental rivalry and look to the military for the benefits of standardization and best practices.

Many, including the NYPD, don’t have access to enough non-lethal enforcement options, nor do they receive much training beyond rudimentary handling tactics.

The lack of access to non-lethal tactics just has me scratching my head, especially in a city like Manhattan where only NYPD supervisors can carry Tasers (a non-lethal option).

Does police leadership really want officers opening fire in a crowded Times Square or Grand Central Station? Bullets hit the bad guys and keep going until they hit something or someone else. As a sniper, we call this “clearing your bullet path.”