In the intricate tapestry of modern geopolitics, where the threads of history and strategy intertwine, Prime Minister Netanyahu’s proposed limitations on Israel’s Supreme Court echo ominously with the shadows of past authoritarian regimes.

Netanyahu’s move is not just a political maneuver; it’s a seismic shift in the balance of power, reminiscent of a playbook used by authoritarian leaders throughout history. When we ironically recall Hitler‘s rise to power, it wasn’t marked by a single, dramatic overthrow but by a series of calculated steps that gradually eroded democratic institutions and checks and balances. Similarly, Netanyahu’s proposed restrictions on the Supreme Court represent a chipping away at the bedrock of Israeli democracy, potentially allowing for unchecked executive power.

The essence of democracy lies in its systems of checks and balances. It’s why America thrives as an imperfect democracy. There are many hurdles to getting laws passed or changed in the US. The House, Senate, and President, along with our own Supreme Court, all have a say.

Israel has just one body to balance political power, and that is their Supreme Court.