The United States has a long history of internal cultural struggles. As a melting pot nation that spans across thousands of miles and encompasses hundreds of millions of individuals, our permissive form of government allows our culture to create itself through the conjoining of seemingly disparate belief systems and ideologies. This process is invariably contentious, as the tribes within the greater state of America fight among themselves for influence with conversations that are often carried out in public by only those with the most extreme of views. This process, though sometimes violent, has proven to be a point of strength for America in many ways, as the nation has grown from a hodgepodge of colonies to a collection of almost independent nation-states joined through a loose confederation, to its role as the globe’s only superpower in a fraction of the time some European powers have existed.
However, while America’s cultural alchemy is good for marrying the beliefs, principles, and values of different groups of people into something greater than its individual parts, there is a downside. Within the borders of the United States, debate and discussion often give way to open contempt, and we begin to see our own neighbors as a threat to our ideals, often at the expense of paying attention to the greater threats looming just beyond the horizon.
Other nations with more oppressive regimes and no systemic allowances for differences of opinion have taken note of America’s unique brand of self-flagellation, often resulting in a somewhat regular exchange of power between conservative and progressive movements. Every four to eight years, the political figurehead of the United States steps down in favor of a newly elected executive, and from that single change springs a slew of shifts in policy and rhetoric. One president will focus on defense, perhaps to the chagrin of those championing social reform. The next president will focus on those social efforts while allowing economics to slide. Our cultural combat and reactionary politics mandate that the president (and all elected officials) address the pressing topics of the day — as decided by the largest, or loudest, sects of the population.
Meanwhile, in China, where President Xi Jinping recently had the term limits eliminated from his position, the national government plays an active role in censoring not only national culture but also foreign cultures that are permitted for consumption within their borders. Dissidents disappear, criticism of the government or its leadership is banned from online discussion, and amid this environment of cultural control, things like defense initiatives can move more quickly and with greater effect thanks to their mandated universal acceptance. While America sees foreign policy as just another topic for discussion and debate among ourselves, China’s international efforts enjoy a level of consistency in strategy that’s made nearly impossible by the ebb and flow of American democracy. While we change tracks, tactics, and funding models under each new administration, China capitalizes on our self-inflicted shortsightedness.