VFA for Criminal Jurisdiction
For starters, the Philippines Visiting Forces Agreement is a legal instrument for the United States to have jurisdiction over US personnel, whether military or civilian individuals, who were accused of crimes domestically committed in the Philippines. The treaty makes it possible for the US government to take responsibility for the trial, detention, and punishment of any US personnel accused of a crime when:
- The crime was committed against the property, people, and/or security of the United States.
- An offense was committed outside of official duty.
Enhanced Military Movements and Tax Incentives
Military entrance and departure and the movement of US personnel and soldiers in the Philippines are also covered by the Visiting Forces Agreement. US forces are exempted from passport and visa regulations typically required by airports and seaports in the Philippines. More so, aircraft, vessels, and vehicles operated by the United States may enter Philippine territory as long as there is approval from the Philippines. They also enter free of change without port and landing fees.
US personnel can also drive using US government-owned vehicles with their US license. The US armed forces also enjoy duty-free and tax-free importation and acquisition of any military-related materials, supplies, and other similar objects.
Note that there were multiple agreements before and after the VFA, so if you want to learn more about them, stay tuned to our other articles included in this series.
Philippine Army Training with the US
The VFA is a tool used by the Philippine army to train their armed forces with the help of the United States. For example, the Balikatan Exercises (known as the shoulder-to-shoulder exercises in English) enable the Philippines and the United States to have military exercises that develop the skills of both parties through enhanced training in hand-to-hand combat, counterterrorism, and even providing humanitarian assistance to each other.
Increased Stability In The Region
The VFA was notably instrumental in the containment policy of China’s expansionist claims on the West Philippine Sea (also known as the South China Sea), wherein a group of islands is continually disputed by Brunei, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Malaysia, Vietnam, and the Philippines.
China claims the entire expanse of the seas through a 9-dash line that encompasses all Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ) for all countries involved. Former US Secretary of State Michael Pompeo had said that the international law is clear on the matter, that there is no legal basis for the Chinese claim on the islands and that the US aligns itself with the historical Philippine legal win against the Chinese claims filed under the Permanent Court of Arbitration pursuant to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
Current US Secretary of State Antony Blinken echoed such rhetoric in his visit to Indonesia in December 2021, stating that:
“Five years ago, an international tribunal delivered a unanimous and legally binding decision firmly rejecting unlawful, expansive South China Sea maritime claims as being inconsistent with international law. We and other countries, including South China Sea claimants, will continue to push back on such behavior,”
In fact, just a few days ago, on January 20, 2022, the USS Benfold of the 7th Fleet conducted a freedom of navigation exercise near the Paracel Islands in an attempt to uphold international law. Through the VFA, the US, along with France and the United Kingdom, in response to Chinese naval aggression in the region, has conducted freedom of navigation exercises to further international law on the high seas.
The Source Of Political Debate In The Philippines
Activists and politicians alike in the Philippines are heavily divided with the implementation of the VFA. Members of the left have historically opposed the VFA, often stating that it is a form of neocolonialism and neo-imperialism on the part of the United States. Others have a different view, seeing that the VFA is needed for upholding security within the West Philippine Sea.
What’s Next For The VFA
Since it is an executive agreement, only the President of the Philippines can terminate the Visiting Forces Agreement, much like how President Rodrigo Duterte tried and failed to intimidate former US President Donald Trump with the attempted termination of the VFA. This comes with the Mindanaoan president’s personal ties and leanings toward Beijing due to the Build Build Build Infrastructure Project.
With the US-Philippine security alliance at stake, the next Philippine president does have some thinking to do. Will it continue the current trajectory of leaning toward the Chinese, enhance army cooperation with the US and other allies, or stand alone in the fight for sovereignty within its coastal regions?
COMMENTS