Soldiers are shown here during "equal opportunity training" at Fort Eustis, VA in this June 23, 2020 photo. Image credit: US Army David Overson
Introduction
In recent years, the concept of “wokeness” has gained significant attention, permeating various aspects of society, including politics and the military. While the intentions behind promoting social justice and equality are noble, the implementation of “woke” political policies within the military has had a negative impact on senior military leadership, its effectiveness, and operational readiness. This essay aims to explore how the infusion of such policies, which primarily focus on identity politics and political correctness, has negatively influenced the armed forces.
Erosion of Meritocracy
One of the detrimental effects of woke political policy on the military is the erosion of meritocracy. Traditionally, the military has prided itself on valuing and rewarding individuals based on their skills, abilities, and performance, regardless of their background or identity. However, with the introduction of woke policies, there has been an increasing emphasis on diversity quotas and prioritizing identity-based factors during promotions and hiring processes. Consequently, this undermines the notion of meritocracy and raises concerns about the effectiveness of the military’s leadership structure.
Lowering of Standards
Another negative consequence of the woke political policy within the military is the potential lowering of standards to accommodate diversity and inclusivity. The military’s primary objective is to defend national security, and ensuring that service members are physically and mentally capable is of utmost importance. However, when policies are enacted to prioritize diversity over equal standards, it can compromise the overall readiness and effectiveness of the armed forces. Lowering standards for recruitment or physical fitness requirements based on gender or other identity factors weakens the military’s ability to perform at its best.
Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz Warns of Wokeness in the Military
Division and Distrust
The infusion of woke political policies can also lead to division and distrust within the military ranks. These policies often focus on highlighting and addressing historical injustices, which can inadvertently create a sense of victimhood or guilt among certain groups. When identity politics becomes a central focus, it can lead to an “us versus them” mentality, undermining cohesion and esprit de corps within the military. This division hampers teamwork, trust, and the ability to execute missions effectively.
Distraction from Core Mission
Perhaps one of the most significant negative impacts of woke political policy is the diversion of attention and resources from the core mission of the military. The military exists to protect the nation and its citizens, and any policies or initiatives that detract from this primary objective can be detrimental. When commanders and military leaders are forced to prioritize implementing diversity training or other social justice initiatives, it can divert time, energy, and resources away from training, preparedness, and operational readiness. This distraction can ultimately weaken the military’s ability to respond to threats and fulfill its crucial role.
Politicization of the Military
Lastly, the infusion of woke political policy into the military has the potential to politicize the institution. The military has traditionally prided itself on being apolitical, focused solely on defending the nation and upholding the Constitution. However, when political ideologies and agendas are introduced into military policies, it can compromise the neutrality and impartiality of the armed forces. This politicization not only undermines the military’s credibility but also creates a divisive atmosphere where individuals may feel compelled to conform to certain ideologies rather than focusing on their duty to the nation.
Sheep leading Lions
Wokeness has negatively affected senior military leadership. There has been a growing concern that the leadership of the US Military senior leadership is becoming more like sheep, lacking the boldness and decisiveness that our service members deserve. It is imperative that we have leaders who embody the spirit of lions, capable of making tough decisions, leading from the front, and ensuring the best interests of our military personnel.
Introduction
In recent years, the concept of “wokeness” has gained significant attention, permeating various aspects of society, including politics and the military. While the intentions behind promoting social justice and equality are noble, the implementation of “woke” political policies within the military has had a negative impact on senior military leadership, its effectiveness, and operational readiness. This essay aims to explore how the infusion of such policies, which primarily focus on identity politics and political correctness, has negatively influenced the armed forces.
Erosion of Meritocracy
One of the detrimental effects of woke political policy on the military is the erosion of meritocracy. Traditionally, the military has prided itself on valuing and rewarding individuals based on their skills, abilities, and performance, regardless of their background or identity. However, with the introduction of woke policies, there has been an increasing emphasis on diversity quotas and prioritizing identity-based factors during promotions and hiring processes. Consequently, this undermines the notion of meritocracy and raises concerns about the effectiveness of the military’s leadership structure.
Lowering of Standards
Another negative consequence of the woke political policy within the military is the potential lowering of standards to accommodate diversity and inclusivity. The military’s primary objective is to defend national security, and ensuring that service members are physically and mentally capable is of utmost importance. However, when policies are enacted to prioritize diversity over equal standards, it can compromise the overall readiness and effectiveness of the armed forces. Lowering standards for recruitment or physical fitness requirements based on gender or other identity factors weakens the military’s ability to perform at its best.
Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz Warns of Wokeness in the Military
Division and Distrust
The infusion of woke political policies can also lead to division and distrust within the military ranks. These policies often focus on highlighting and addressing historical injustices, which can inadvertently create a sense of victimhood or guilt among certain groups. When identity politics becomes a central focus, it can lead to an “us versus them” mentality, undermining cohesion and esprit de corps within the military. This division hampers teamwork, trust, and the ability to execute missions effectively.
Distraction from Core Mission
Perhaps one of the most significant negative impacts of woke political policy is the diversion of attention and resources from the core mission of the military. The military exists to protect the nation and its citizens, and any policies or initiatives that detract from this primary objective can be detrimental. When commanders and military leaders are forced to prioritize implementing diversity training or other social justice initiatives, it can divert time, energy, and resources away from training, preparedness, and operational readiness. This distraction can ultimately weaken the military’s ability to respond to threats and fulfill its crucial role.
Politicization of the Military
Lastly, the infusion of woke political policy into the military has the potential to politicize the institution. The military has traditionally prided itself on being apolitical, focused solely on defending the nation and upholding the Constitution. However, when political ideologies and agendas are introduced into military policies, it can compromise the neutrality and impartiality of the armed forces. This politicization not only undermines the military’s credibility but also creates a divisive atmosphere where individuals may feel compelled to conform to certain ideologies rather than focusing on their duty to the nation.
Sheep leading Lions
Wokeness has negatively affected senior military leadership. There has been a growing concern that the leadership of the US Military senior leadership is becoming more like sheep, lacking the boldness and decisiveness that our service members deserve. It is imperative that we have leaders who embody the spirit of lions, capable of making tough decisions, leading from the front, and ensuring the best interests of our military personnel.
Conclusion
While the intentions behind promoting social justice and equality are admirable, the infusion of woke political policy into the military has had a negative impact on senior military leadership, its effectiveness, and operational readiness. The erosion of meritocracy, lowering of standards, division, distraction from the core mission, and politicization of the military are all detrimental consequences of implementing such policies. It is essential to strike a balance between addressing social issues and maintaining the military’s primary objective of defending national security. By prioritizing meritocracy, maintaining high standards, fostering unity, and staying apolitical, the military can preserve its effectiveness and ensure the safety of the nation.
Donald C. Bolduc
As someone who’s seen what happens when the truth is distorted, I know how unfair it feels when those who’ve sacrificed the most lose their voice. At SOFREP, our veteran journalists, who once fought for freedom, now fight to bring you unfiltered, real-world intel. But without your support, we risk losing this vital source of truth. By subscribing, you’re not just leveling the playing field—you’re standing with those who’ve already given so much, ensuring they continue to serve by delivering stories that matter. Every subscription means we can hire more veterans and keep their hard-earned knowledge in the fight. Don’t let their voices be silenced. Please consider subscribing now.
One team, one fight,
Brandon Webb former Navy SEAL, Bestselling Author and Editor-in-Chief
Barrett is the world leader in long-range, large-caliber, precision rifle design and manufacturing. Barrett products are used by civilians, sport shooters, law enforcement agencies, the United States military, and more than 75 State Department-approved countries around the world.
PO Box 1077 MURFREESBORO, Tennessee 37133 United States
Scrubba Wash Bag
Our ultra-portable washing machine makes your journey easier. This convenient, pocket-sized travel companion allows you to travel lighter while helping you save money, time and water.
Our roots in shooting sports started off back in 1996 with our founder and CEO, Josh Ungier. His love of airguns took hold of our company from day one and we became the first e-commerce retailer dedicated to airguns, optics, ammo, and accessories. Over the next 25 years, customers turned to us for our unmatched product selection, great advice, education, and continued support of the sport and airgun industry.
COMMENTS
There are
on this article.
You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.