The Foundation of National Security: A Strong Economy and Energy Independence

The question of how to keep America safe is not complex but is multifaceted. Still, the critical components of a comprehensive national security strategy include maintaining a strong economy, achieving energy independence, having a robust military with competent leadership, and earning the respect and trust of our allies while instilling fear in our enemies.

A strong economy is the foundation of national security, as it provides the resources necessary to fund defense initiatives, support critical infrastructure, and invest in cutting-edge technologies. A thriving economy also enhances our global competitiveness and strengthens our position on the world stage, enabling us to better respond to emerging threats and challenges.

Energy independence is another critical factor in ensuring America‘s security. By reducing our reliance on foreign energy sources, we can insulate ourselves from geopolitical disruptions, enhance our energy security, and reduce our vulnerability to supply chain disruptions and price fluctuations. Moreover, energy independence strengthens our economic resilience and enhances our national security posture.

America
Original illustration by SOFREP

Balancing Diplomacy and Deterrence: A New Approach for the Biden Administration

The Biden administration’s national security policy has come under scrutiny for its perceived appeasement and ineffective deterrence stance. This approach depends on intense diplomacy and effective negotiation over confrontation and military action that must be backed up with strength, trust, and dependability. Unfortunately, because of a struggling economy, energy dependence, foreign policy failures in every region, and a lack of confidence and support from our allies, this strategy has raised concerns about the administration’s ability to protect US interests, support our allies, and ensure the safety of our troops deployed worldwide.

As a strategy, appeasement involves concessions to potential adversaries in the hopes of avoiding conflict. While diplomacy and negotiation can be valuable tools in international relations, there is a fine line between seeking peaceful resolutions and appearing weak or indecisive. The Biden administration’s willingness to engage with countries like Iran and North Korea, even in the face of continued aggression and threats, has been criticized as a sign of weakness that has emboldened our enemies.

In addition, the lack of a strong deterrence strategy under the Biden administration has raised concerns about the safety and security of our troops deployed in conflict regions. Without a clear message that aggression towards US interests will be met with swift and decisive action, our service members are left vulnerable to attacks from enemies who see an opportunity to exploit this perceived weakness.

The Biden administration must reevaluate its national security policy and strike the right balance between diplomacy and deterrence. We must send a strong and clear message to our adversaries that any threats or attacks against US interests will be met with a robust response. This will not only protect our troops and allies but also uphold our national security interests and ensure stability in regions of conflict.

The administration must reassess its approach and prioritize a strategy that ensures the protection of US interests and sends a strong message to our adversaries that aggression will not be tolerated.