The backlog. The backlog of pending claims for veterans’ disability benefits has become the bogeyman that haunts the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. Over the past several years, VA has exerted substantial efforts to exorcise this demon at the initial filing stage. In other words, VA focused its attention, with mixed results, on shortening the time it takes for vets to receive an initial decision on their claims. Recently, however, VA has shifted its focus to the appeals process—with good reason. According to VA, in 2015, more than 417,000 appeals were pending before the agency, and the average appeal was pending more than three years when a decision was finally issued. The numbers only get worse when VA isolates the appeals that made it to the Board of Veterans Appeals. There, the average cumulative wait time for a decision by the board was more than five years.

March 23 GAO report

On March 23, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a report titled “VA DISABILITY BENEFITS: Additional Planning Would Enhance Efforts to Improve the Timeliness of Appeals Decisions” addressing VA’s efforts to reform the appeals process. The report, which focuses primarily upon proposed reforms at the Board of Veterans Appeals, offers mixed grades. It recognizes the positive efforts that have been made by VA, and appears to agree that the agency has identified the correct areas that require focus. However, the GAO takes issue with VA’s efforts to implement those changes, and notes that the failure of VA to adhere to best practices puts veterans at risk.

Key reforms: Staffing, process, and technology

VA has identified three key areas that it believes are critical to eliminating the backlog at the appellate level. First, the agency plans to continue the hiring surge it started last year. Second, VA states that it plans to streamline the appellate process, principally by limiting the opportunities for veterans to submit new evidence while claims are at the appellate level. Third, VA plans to replace the outdated IT system that the board has relied upon since the 1990s.

Ideas versus implementation

As stated above, the GAO does not take issue with VA’s assessment of the three key areas that need to be addressed. However, in its report, the GAO notes that the manner in which the VA plans to implement its proposed changes is problematic. For example, although the GAO recognizes that the VA is short-staffed, it takes the VA to task for failing to adequately plan for providing office space and appropriate training for the new employees it plans to hire.

The report addresses each of VA’s three focus areas. With respect to changing the appellate process, the GAO applauds VA’s efforts to work with VSOs to ensure that changes are fair to veterans. However, the watchdog agency points out that VA has failed to adequately plan an implementation strategy that accounts for possible problems that might crop up. In particular, it takes serious issue with VA’s desire to implement the new appellate program without first conducting pilot testing. This friction point is significant enough that the GAO has recommended Congress weigh in on the matter. Finally, the GAO is concerned that VA has failed to adequately establish time tables for the implementation of the proposed new IT system.

At the end of the day, the GAO and VA—and almost everyone else concerned—agree that the appellate process needs to be reformed. The GAO report, however, raises concerns over whether VA is adhering to best practices, and if not, whether the proposed changes will do more good or more harm to veterans.

This article is authored through the collaborative efforts of Travis James West and other legal professionals at West & Dunn, a law firm dedicated to providing quality legal services and business counseling to individuals and businesses, with a particular focus on assisting veterans of the United States military services. 

Featured image courtesy of Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg