Since Russia’s military annexation of Crimea in 2014, NATO officials have been working tirelessly to find ways to effectively counter Russian aggression throughout Europe’s Eastern flank. Troops from throughout the alliance have established new commands all over the continent, and plans continue to develop to mount an even more robust defensive posture in the region. Despite this, U.S. Defense officials have made it clear that a concerted Russian incursion into Europe, particularly in or around the Baltics, would be nearly impossible to stop — the best NATO forces could hope to do is delay the Russian advance until reinforcements could arrive.
This Cold War-esque posture is different that the types of warfare the United States has become accustomed to throughout nearly two straight decades of counter-insurgency warfare, prompting a shift in tactics and strategies that are better suited to the region. Eastern Europe, for instance, has a number of old airfields and abandoned strips of highway, relics of the Cold War, that would offer little value to most advanced military aircraft that require well manicured strips of blacktop to prevent Foreign Object Damage (FOD), as debris from the blacktop is kicked up into functioning engines.
The A-10 Thunderbolt II, however, is not like most modern military aircraft.
Thanks to engines mounted above the wings, the A-10 isn’t nearly as susceptible to damage caused by runway debris kicking up during take off and landing operations, making it uniquely suited for austere runway environments like an abandoned highway in Poland or a disused runway in Estonia. A Russian invasion of the Baltics would undoubtedly include massive numbers of land assets — from troops to artillery — and the A-10 would play a vital role in hindering Russian armor from running amok while an allied response could be mounted.