Introduction

In recent years, the concept of “wokeness” has gained significant attention, permeating various aspects of society, including politics and the military. While the intentions behind promoting social justice and equality are noble, the implementation of “woke” political policies within the military has had a negative impact on senior military leadership, its effectiveness, and operational readiness. This essay aims to explore how the infusion of such policies, which primarily focus on identity politics and political correctness, has negatively influenced the armed forces.

Erosion of Meritocracy

One of the detrimental effects of woke political policy on the military is the erosion of meritocracy. Traditionally, the military has prided itself on valuing and rewarding individuals based on their skills, abilities, and performance, regardless of their background or identity. However, with the introduction of woke policies, there has been an increasing emphasis on diversity quotas and prioritizing identity-based factors during promotions and hiring processes. Consequently, this undermines the notion of meritocracy and raises concerns about the effectiveness of the military’s leadership structure.

Lowering of Standards

Another negative consequence of the woke political policy within the military is the potential lowering of standards to accommodate diversity and inclusivity. The military’s primary objective is to defend national security, and ensuring that service members are physically and mentally capable is of utmost importance. However, when policies are enacted to prioritize diversity over equal standards, it can compromise the overall readiness and effectiveness of the armed forces. Lowering standards for recruitment or physical fitness requirements based on gender or other identity factors weakens the military’s ability to perform at its best.

Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz Warns of Wokeness in the Military