The left-leaning Huffington Post recently published an article on the effectiveness of Congress. The article accurately described that the 118th Congress is on track to be the most ineffective and least productive Congress since the Great Depression ( It is no secret to most Americans that our executive and legislative branches are failing to safeguard Americans, ensure a budget is passed on time, guarantee responsible spending, and hold government officials accountable.

Selecting cabinet members and senior government officials is crucial to any presidential administration. These individuals possess the power to shape and implement policies that directly impact the nation and its citizens. However, a trend has emerged over the years where presidents tend to appoint individuals, and the Senate rubber stamps the appointments. Most appointees come from Ivy League institutions, think tanks, and government bureaucracies to hold these critical positions. While these individuals may possess exceptional qualifications, the next president must diversify their cabinet by considering candidates from broader backgrounds and experiences. This essay will explore why it is crucial to break away from the traditional mold and embrace a fresher, more inclusive approach to cabinet selection.

Promoting Diversity of Thought

One of the primary reasons to avoid an overreliance on Ivy League graduates think tank members, and government bureaucrats in cabinet appointments is to foster diversity of thought. While these individuals undoubtedly possess valuable expertise and extensive knowledge in their respective fields, their backgrounds often lead to a certain homogeneity of ideas and perspectives. By limiting the cabinet pool to these groups, we risk excluding individuals who offer unique insights and alternative approaches to governance. A diverse cabinet, comprising individuals from different backgrounds, ethnicities, genders, and socioeconomic statuses, can provide a broader range of perspectives, leading to more innovative and inclusive policymaking.

Representation and Inclusivity

Appointing cabinet members from a narrow pool of Ivy League, think tank, and government bureaucrats backgrounds perpetuates a lack of representation and inclusivity within the administration. Such appointments tend to favor individuals who have had privileged access to elite educational institutions and networks. Consequently, this disproportionately excludes talented individuals from less privileged backgrounds who may possess invaluable experiences and insights. The next president must consider the importance of representation within the cabinet, ensuring it reflects the rich diversity of the nation’s population. By doing so, they can instill a sense of confidence and trust among marginalized communities, demonstrating a commitment to equitable governance.

Addressing Public Distrust

Over time, appointing individuals from the same background breeds public cynicism and distrust. The perception of a revolving door between Ivy League institutions think tanks, and government bureaucracies can create skepticism among citizens. This skepticism often stems from the belief that decisions are made by an exclusive circle of elitists who have little connection to the everyday concerns of ordinary Americans. The next president should strive to diversify their cabinet appointments to rebuild public confidence and restore faith in the political system. By embracing various backgrounds and experiences, the next president can demonstrate a commitment to inclusivity, representation, and diversity of thought. This approach enhances the administration’s legitimacy and ensures that policies are tailored to meet the needs and aspirations of a broader spectrum of citizens.

The Limitations of Ivy League Education

While an Ivy League education is often associated with prestige and intellectual prowess, relying solely on these institutions for cabinet appointments and other senior-level government positions can result in a narrow range of perspectives and experiences. The focus on certain academic institutions may overlook other essential qualities, such as practical knowledge, experience, empathy, and a deep understanding of societal challenges. We can ensure a more comprehensive representation of diverse backgrounds, cultures, and perspectives by broadening the selection criteria.

The Disconnect of Political Elites

Political elites, who have spent their entire careers in the political realm, may inadvertently create a disconnect with the realities faced by ordinary citizens. Their extensive experience within the existing power structures can result in resistance to change and an inability to adapt to new circumstances. By including individuals from various professional backgrounds, such as academia, business, or community organizing, we can infuse fresh ideas, innovation, and a greater understanding of the needs of the people they serve.

The Limitations of Think Tank Elites

Think tank elites often possess an abundance of theoretical knowledge and policy expertise. However, their practical experience may need to be improved, leading to a potential gap between policy proposals and their real-world implications. Additionally, the tendency to rely heavily on ideological frameworks can hinder the exploration of alternative perspectives. By incorporating individuals with hands-on experience in relevant fields, we can bridge this gap and ensure more pragmatic decision-making.