The constitutional changes were approved through a nationwide referendum, with 78% of voters supporting the amendments. While the Kremlin emphasized popular provisions like pension indexation and minimum wage guarantees, critics argued that the reforms primarily aimed to consolidate Putin’s power. Additionally, the amendments granted lifelong immunity to former presidents and expanded presidential powers, further solidifying Putin’s control over Russia’s political system.
Is Trump trying to “pull a Putin”? Guess we’ll have to wait and see.
President Trump’s Assertions and Legal Interpretations
Despite this clear constitutional limitation, President Trump has suggested that there are “methods” to pursue a third term, asserting that he is “not joking” about the possibility. One speculated strategy involves Vice President JD Vance running for president with the understanding that, upon election, he would resign, allowing Trump to assume the presidency through succession. This approach attempts to exploit the Amendment’s language, which prohibits being “elected” more than twice but does not explicitly forbid succession to the office. Legal experts, however, contend that such maneuvers would face significant constitutional challenges and are unlikely to succeed.
Arguments in Favor of a Third Term
Continuity of Leadership
Proponents argue that extending President Trump’s tenure could provide stability and continuity, especially during times of national or global crisis. They contend that his established policies and leadership style have fostered economic growth and bolstered national security, and a third term would allow for the completion of long-term initiatives.
Popular Support and Democratic Will
Supporters also point to the democratic principle of respecting the electorate’s choice. Suppose the American people clearly desire Trump’s continued leadership through the ballot box. In that case, some argue that this collective will should take precedence over constitutional constraints, warranting a re-examination of term limits.
Arguments Against a Third Term
Constitutional Integrity
Critics emphasize the importance of adhering to the Constitution’s provisions to maintain the rule of law. They argue that attempting to circumvent the 22nd Amendment undermines the foundational principles of the nation’s governance and sets a dangerous precedent for future leaders.
Risk of Authoritarianism
Opponents also raise concerns about the concentration of power and the potential erosion of democratic institutions. They caution that extending a president’s tenure beyond the established limits could lead to authoritarian tendencies, diminishing the checks and balances system designed to prevent power abuse.
Clearly, There Have Already Been People War Gaming the “What-Ifs”
Trump should really stop talking about running for a third term unless he wants to get absolutely humiliated by President Obama in a presidential race. pic.twitter.com/eb6S2Hna4v
— Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) March 30, 2025
Political and Public Response
The notion of a third term has elicited varied reactions from politicians and the public alike. Some of President Trump’s allies, including former adviser Steve Bannon, have voiced support for exploring avenues to extend his presidency. Conversely, figures like Representative Daniel Goldman have criticized such discussions, viewing them as attempts to erode democratic foundations.
Public opinion remains divided, with some citizens rallying behind the idea of continued leadership while others express concern over the implications for democratic norms and constitutional adherence.
Oh boy…
Steve Bannon says they’re working on a Way to give President Donald Trump a 3rd Term in Office 👀
“We’ll see what the definition of term-limit is…. This has been many years in the making, and we’ve had greater long-shots than Trump 2028.”
In a few months, it will be… pic.twitter.com/j2YLy9sCFZ
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) March 19, 2025
Looking Forward
The debate over President Trump’s potential pursuit of a third term has triggered broader discussions about constitutional fidelity, democratic principles, and the balance of power within the United States. While the 22nd Amendment presents a clear barrier, the discourse surrounding this issue reflects American political life’s dynamic and often contentious nature. As this conversation unfolds, it will undoubtedly prompt further examination of the values and structures that underpin the nation’s democracy.








COMMENTS