If women are allowed to go to selection for SOF, then they should be permitted to go immediately and not be forced to wait. Currently, a minimum number of women must qualify and volunteer for a given class. That means if you’re a woman, and you want to go to selection—and you’ve been deemed worthy, like the two women recently chosen—you must wait until a minimum number has been reached before you can attend.
The two female soldiers identified are going to have to wait until next year, whether they know it or not. By next spring they’ll be able to go if they have the requisite cohort of female candidates joining them. If they don’t, they aren’t going. I can’t help but wonder if the selection of these two was made public to discourage these two women from moving on. It’s unfair that others have given up and moved on to other things to further their careers due to the cohort requirement and the unknown waiting time. From what I understand, the women who made it through Ranger School went through a very long training process leading up to their attendance, and were forced to wait for the process in the same fashion. Their journey began at the academy.
Taking soldiers out of operational cycles to satisfy political objectives is not OK for the force, and is a wasteful use of tax dollars. Congressional oversight will, someday, look at the money invested into these projects meant to maximize the success rate of the first females sent into the fray and decide it was not an efficient use of government spending and resources. If it’s necessary to treat an applicant as a professional athlete before they enter the force when others can prepare, pass, and meet the standard on their own, then there’s an imbalance and an unfair system is in place. I’ve no doubt some women can pass selection and train up on their own. There are women around the world who are warfighters already, without significant preparation.
If someone is qualified to attend SFAS, then they should be afforded the opportunity to go to it when they’re ready and accepted into a class, not deferred for no concrete reason. The military, which is often so cautious but is also willing to take huge risks on the battlefield, should consider each applicant like a product in need of development. So many go to selection and fail and quit. We need to know who they are upfront, without a significant amount of time spent preparing them. It seems like a political maneuver and not a tactical one that has SOF, and its fighting capability, in mind. I think I might even endorse a separate and reasonable standard for women, leaving men’s unchanged, rather than making women prepare to go only to have their ticket pulled for factors beyond their control.
If women are allowed to go to selection for SOF, then they should be permitted to go immediately and not be forced to wait. Currently, a minimum number of women must qualify and volunteer for a given class. That means if you’re a woman, and you want to go to selection—and you’ve been deemed worthy, like the two women recently chosen—you must wait until a minimum number has been reached before you can attend.
The two female soldiers identified are going to have to wait until next year, whether they know it or not. By next spring they’ll be able to go if they have the requisite cohort of female candidates joining them. If they don’t, they aren’t going. I can’t help but wonder if the selection of these two was made public to discourage these two women from moving on. It’s unfair that others have given up and moved on to other things to further their careers due to the cohort requirement and the unknown waiting time. From what I understand, the women who made it through Ranger School went through a very long training process leading up to their attendance, and were forced to wait for the process in the same fashion. Their journey began at the academy.
Taking soldiers out of operational cycles to satisfy political objectives is not OK for the force, and is a wasteful use of tax dollars. Congressional oversight will, someday, look at the money invested into these projects meant to maximize the success rate of the first females sent into the fray and decide it was not an efficient use of government spending and resources. If it’s necessary to treat an applicant as a professional athlete before they enter the force when others can prepare, pass, and meet the standard on their own, then there’s an imbalance and an unfair system is in place. I’ve no doubt some women can pass selection and train up on their own. There are women around the world who are warfighters already, without significant preparation.
If someone is qualified to attend SFAS, then they should be afforded the opportunity to go to it when they’re ready and accepted into a class, not deferred for no concrete reason. The military, which is often so cautious but is also willing to take huge risks on the battlefield, should consider each applicant like a product in need of development. So many go to selection and fail and quit. We need to know who they are upfront, without a significant amount of time spent preparing them. It seems like a political maneuver and not a tactical one that has SOF, and its fighting capability, in mind. I think I might even endorse a separate and reasonable standard for women, leaving men’s unchanged, rather than making women prepare to go only to have their ticket pulled for factors beyond their control.
As someone who’s seen what happens when the truth is distorted, I know how unfair it feels when those who’ve sacrificed the most lose their voice. At SOFREP, our veteran journalists, who once fought for freedom, now fight to bring you unfiltered, real-world intel. But without your support, we risk losing this vital source of truth. By subscribing, you’re not just leveling the playing field—you’re standing with those who’ve already given so much, ensuring they continue to serve by delivering stories that matter. Every subscription means we can hire more veterans and keep their hard-earned knowledge in the fight. Don’t let their voices be silenced. Please consider subscribing now.
One team, one fight,
Brandon Webb former Navy SEAL, Bestselling Author and Editor-in-Chief
Barrett is the world leader in long-range, large-caliber, precision rifle design and manufacturing. Barrett products are used by civilians, sport shooters, law enforcement agencies, the United States military, and more than 75 State Department-approved countries around the world.
PO Box 1077 MURFREESBORO, Tennessee 37133 United States
Scrubba Wash Bag
Our ultra-portable washing machine makes your journey easier. This convenient, pocket-sized travel companion allows you to travel lighter while helping you save money, time and water.
Our roots in shooting sports started off back in 1996 with our founder and CEO, Josh Ungier. His love of airguns took hold of our company from day one and we became the first e-commerce retailer dedicated to airguns, optics, ammo, and accessories. Over the next 25 years, customers turned to us for our unmatched product selection, great advice, education, and continued support of the sport and airgun industry.
COMMENTS
There are on this article.
You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.