In May 1940, the Allied and German Armies squared off in what was expected to be an extended campaign for the conquest of France. Six weeks later, the victorious German Army marched down the Champs-Elysees in Paris. How was it that the Germans, with fewer tanks, fewer trucks, fewer troops, less artillery and access to roughly equivalent technologies, managed to accomplish such a remarkable feat?
While leadership, luck, and a host of other factors were at play, the decisive factor was the remarkable way in which a few German interwar military thinkers envisioned and developed a new way of warfare, known to the Allies as the blitzkrieg. German doctrine successfully integrated current technologies in aircraft, radios, and tanks into a coherent and integrated way of fighting and then applied it to great effect. The result was amplified because the Germans fought an enemy that in many cases failed to account for the possibilities enabled by the new combination of these technologies.
Read the rest here.
Featured image courtesy of Lockheed.
Good to hear you're in favor of robotics in the battlefield, Geo. In the industry we often hire prior mil folks like you who have been in the field as Subject Matter Experts during development to cut through the BS and deliver systems that will be practical and maintainable. We can often be in awe of our own technology and do stuff just because we can adding cost with no value.
At my previous company the day a former unmanned system operator introduced himself he showed me a photo of what initially seemed like nothing but a dirt road. He was a sensor operator that day and saw something unusual on the route a few hundred yards ahead of a convoy in Iraq. Long story short he was profusely thanked over the radio for identifying a huge emplaced IED and saving a ton of lives. He told me "that's why I'm here, and that's why you're here too."