This premium article is exclusive to SOFREP+ Subscribers - Thank you for your support.
(Source: Wikimedia/Creative Commons)
Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping met in Uzbekistan on September 15, the first time the two had met in person since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Remarks from the authoritarians were mutually endorsing where interests aligned; however, the speeches highlighted a contrast in strategies and exposed the limit of Beijing’s support for its neighbor. Putin took the opportunity to blast the West’s military expansionism and attem.” At the same time,create a unipolar world,” while Xi emphasized China’s and Russia’s roles in bringing order and positivity to a world in chaos.
What it Means
Putin and Xi’s rhetorical disparity in Uzbekistan suggests the Sino-Russian relationship is limited by self-interests, incongruent strategies, and disparate risk tolerances – all of which will probably continue to weaken the alliance.
The Eastern powers offer mutual moral and political support where objectives overlap, but their strategies are self-reliant, and each has limited influence over the other’s foreign policy. Seven months into Russia’s war in Ukraine, there is little evidence of direct Chinese aid for Russian forces. When the pair last met in February, Xi promised a Russia-China partnership without limits; but Putin’s entanglement in Eastern Europe has apparently posed the limitation of Beijing’s support.
Putin’s and Xi’s independent strategies look to achieve geopolitical and economic dominance by restoring the former glory of their respective empires. However, Xi wishes to climb to the top of the existing order, whereas Putin seeks to play spoiler and upend the international system. Moscow’s ability and inclination to use military force to shape the geopolitical landscape is a competitive advantage that few global powers possess; Putin was troops deploy troops to Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine and use proxies like Wagner Group for contingency operations in Libya, Mali, and the Central African Republic. However, the Russian strongman’s hubris and bias for military action have revealed the fallibility of his forces and an aptitude for poor strategic judgment.
Xi’s relative pragmatism and lower risk tolerance suggest Beijing has no plans to rush to Moscow’s aid with the intent of its strategy to displace American order. China relies heavily on the West to consume its cheap exports and will not risk further crippling its faltering economy to reinforce Russia’s ill-fated military exploits.
Why it Matters
Russia’s dependence on China for an economic lifeline has shifted the Sino-Russian power balance in Beijing’s favor; Xi will continue to capitalize on Moscow’s losses and keep a safe distance from Putin’s quagmire in Ukraine. Xi has struck a balance with Putin: too much support for Russia could subject China to sanctions and slow Beijing’s economic and geopolitical moOn the other hand, tootum. Too little could jeopardize the relationship with Moscow and spoil China’s access to cheap Russian commodities.
Russia has few which to turn to combat mounting sanctions and international isolation, and Putin now relies on Beijing to stave off a looming liquidity crisis. China has capitalized on Moscow’s export woes by capturing a portion of Russia’s lost market share, while China saved more than $3B USD on fuel imports this year thanks to discounted Russian oil. Russia also became China’s top crude oil supplier in May, while Russian liquified natural gas and coal exports to China are near all-time highs.
China’s economic gains, however, are offset by reputational costs. Russia’s floundering military campaign has diluted the Eastern authoritarian brand and its reputation for ruthless efficiency. The same goes for Eastern gamesmanship: instead of dissuading NATO expansion, Putin has driven Northern European neutralists like Finland and Sweden to the alliance and revitalized NATO’s commitment to defense and deterrence. The self-imposed crisis has probably degraded Xi’s confidence in Putin’s judgment and the capability of his military.
The invasion also weakened China’s position in Taiwan. Despite the uptick in Beijing’s bellicose rhetoric, the global backlash to Russia’s incursion has probably changed China’s calculus and the timeline for actions in the Taiwan Strait. Moscow’s test of Western will and the international system has served as a reality check for the Chinese Communist Part. And the flood of lethal aid to Ukraine signals the US and its allies to be prepared to defend their interests and alliances.
Russia’s isolation doesn’t mean China is unwilling to use force to bring Taiwan to heel. But with Xi’s most powerful ally bogged down, on the brink of economic collapse, and its political capital depleted, the CCP will bide its time before embarking on a solo campaign in the East China Sea.
Bryan A. is a former Force Reconnaissance Marine and Intelligence Office the r at the CIA. He currently serves as the Vice President of Special Programs at Hayes Group International. Want to share your story? Reach out to us at [email protected]
Experience news and stories of our veteran journalists with a SOFREP.com subscription! Sign up now and get exclusive access to unique and honest perspectives.
Barrett is the world leader in long-range, large-caliber, precision rifle design and manufacturing. Barrett products are used by civilians, sport shooters, law enforcement agencies, the United States military, and more than 75 State Department-approved countries around the world.
There are on this article.
You must become a subscriber or login to view or post comments on this article.