Harassment: Not Just Physical
When one thinks of harassment in a military setting, physical intimidation or bullying might be the first images to come to mind. However, harassment is not just physical. It’s verbal, emotional, and sometimes even silent.
Several notable cases highlight the various facets of this issue:
The Lackland Air Force Base Scandal (2012)
At this Texas base, dozens of female trainees reported sexual harassment and unwanted advances from training instructors. Beyond the physical violations, many recounted experiences of being belittled.
Others experienced ridicule for their gender and derogatory comments. It emphasized that harassment often melds the physical and verbal.
Marine Corps’ “Marines United” Scandal (2017)
An investigative report unveiled a private Facebook group where explicit photos of female Marines were shared without consent.
This digital violation came with derogatory and demeaning comments. It displayed another instance where harassment wasn’t just physical but took the form of emotional and verbal degradation.
The Fort Hood Independent Review (2020)
Following the tragic murder of Specialist Vanessa Guillen at Fort Hood in Texas was an independent review of the base. Guillen’s family alleged that she had experienced sexual harassment before her death.
However, her fears of retaliation prevented her from formally reporting the incidents. The subsequent review uncovered deep-seated cultural issues at Fort Hood. It revealed numerous accounts of sexual harassment and assault that superiors often downplayed or ignored.
Why Does It Persist? The Code of Silence
One of the most significant barriers to eradicating hazing and harassment from military academies is the unwritten code of silence. Recruits and senior officers might be reluctant to speak out against these practices, fearing backlash, isolation, or perceived weakness.
This silence perpetuates a culture where misconduct can flourish unchecked.
- Historical Precedence: Military institutions have long histories that emphasize loyalty, unity, and putting the group above oneself. Reporting misconduct, for some, might seem like betraying that loyalty.
- Lack of Trust: Many recruits may distrust the chain of command, fearing that superiors will dismiss their complaints or, worse, retaliate. In 2022, the Pentagon released a report on sexual harassment and violence at military academies. It found that out of those who experienced sexual assault, 1 in 3 believed they would face retaliation for reporting.
- Normalization of Behavior: Over time, when hazing and harassment are left unchecked, they can become seen as “rites of passage” or just “how things are done here.” This normalization makes it even harder for individuals to recognize and challenge these behaviors.
In confronting this code of silence, it’s vital to address not just the overt acts of hazing and harassment but the underlying culture that allows them to persist.
Efforts Towards a Safer Environment
Despite the grim picture painted so far, there’s hope. Many military units are taking proactive measures to combat hazing and harassment.
These include stricter monitoring, counseling services, and more transparent reporting mechanisms. Education and awareness campaigns are shedding light on the consequences of such behaviors. They emphasize that strength comes from unity and respect, not dominance or intimidation.
The shadows of hazing and harassment shouldn’t mar the legacy of a military unit. Recognizing and challenging these behaviors is essential. It ensures every recruit has a safe and supportive environment to thrive.
After all, the strength of an army isn’t just in its numbers or weapons but in the integrity and unity of its personnel.
COMMENTS