The Biden administration and EU nations have been painstakingly “careful” to confine the war to Ukraine’s frontiers and the nearby Black Sea, according to reports. They are avoiding anything that might be construed as military escalation with Russia since the beginning of the war. This involves the collection of weaponry that Western nations have given to Kyiv.
The US and NATO supplied short-range missiles, artillery, and small drones, roughly the same weaponry used by Russian forces—including lengthy artillery, air forces, and area air support. Though the Ukrainian Armed Forces halted Russia’s early offensive, this symmetrical strategy—dictated by Western aid, culminated in the protracted struggle currently observed in Ukraine’s east and south.
If it does have any plausibility, this approach has now been exhausted. Keeping Kyiv’s armed force on “life support” has the obvious drawback of subjecting Ukraine to a prolonged state of perpetual war, including the relentless artillery bombardments from Russia that are currently obliterating one town after another in the spirit of World War II. Moreover, the constant stream of more powerful weapons that have recently come on the market, like the High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) and Multiple Launch Rocket Systems (MLRS) produced in the United States, has never really altered the fire suppression strategic plan of the West or the frontline functionality of Ukraine.
A Foreign Affairs report added that the global food crisis emerged due to Russia’s incursion of Ukraine. Russia and Ukraine export 13 percent and 8.5 percent of the world’s wheat. Russian sanctions and Moscow’s naval blockade of Ukraine’s significant seaports have withdrawn these massively essential commodities from the marketplace, jeopardizing food and nutrition security. Consequently, millions of people, especially in developing countries, are at peril of suffering from extreme food shortages and malnutrition.