Fourteen Soldiers Killed in Helicopter Crashes this Year: Here is the Army’s Plan to Fix Aviation Safety

Let’s face it—flying helicopters for the US Army isn’t what it used to be. Today’s pilots are facing a whole new level of complexity, and the Army knows it. As if it isn’t already hard as hell to fly using both hands and both feet. A pilot friend of mine once told me it was like trying to balance a beachball on a spoon while riding a unicycle.

With the rise of advanced airborne threats, more sophisticated missions, and the tragic increase in fatal crashes, it’s clear that Army aviation is in the middle of a wake-up call.

And that wake-up call is leading to some major changes, not just in the technology they’re using but also in how they train the pilots who operate these complicated machines.

In just the past year, the Army has experienced more than double its usual number of fatal aircraft mishaps.

Fourteen soldiers have lost their lives in 10 Class A mishaps—incidents resulting in deaths or damage costing over $2.5 million.

To put that in perspective, the annual average over the last decade was around six deaths per year.

These statistics are hard to ignore, and they’ve set the stage for some serious reflection within the Army’s aviation programs.

Here’s our take on the matter.

Why the Sudden Spike in Crashes?

So, what’s behind this spike in accidents?

A major factor, it turns out, is the tail rotor on the Apache helicopter. It’s played a significant role in about half of the recent crashes.

The issue? When the tail rotor doesn’t spin fast enough, it can’t counter the spin of the main rotor.

You can imagine the chaos that causes mid-flight, especially at high altitudes or when the aircraft is carrying a heavy load.

Simply put, if the tail rotor can’t do its job, the helicopter can start to spin uncontrollably.

Not exactly what you want when you’re flying a multimillion-dollar aircraft in a combat zone.

The Army has plans to address this by developing new tail rotor blades and a drive system for the Apache, but these fixes won’t happen overnight.

And while they’re working on that, they’re also taking a hard look at their training programs for Army aviators, making sure they’re better prepared for the challenges they’re facing in the air.

Recent Army Aviation Mishaps

Recent Army aviation mishaps have tragically claimed the lives of several soldiers and injured others, highlighting ongoing concerns in training and equipment.

In February, two separate Apache crashes occurred—one in Utah, injuring two soldiers, and another in Mississippi, killing two soldiers.

In March, a UH-72 Lakota crash near the US-Mexico border claimed the lives of two Army National Guardsmen and a border patrol agent.

Additional incidents followed, including an Apache crash at Joint Base Lewis-McChord in Washington that injured two soldiers, a crash at Fort Carson, Colorado, injuring two more, and a May Apache mishap at Fort Riley, Kansas.

Most recently, in August, an Apache crash out of Fort Novosel killed a civilian contractor instructor and injured a student pilot, with tail rotor issues playing a significant role in about half of these incidents.

Training for a New Kind of Air Warfare

It’s not just about fixing the hardware, though.

Modern air warfare is evolving, and pilots are now dealing with threats and responsibilities they never saw during the wars of the past.

Today’s missions involve advanced sensing, detection systems, and even “launched effects,” like drone-based weapons that pilots have to manage in real-time.

All of this adds new layers of complexity to their already high-pressure jobs.

The Army is rethinking how it trains its aircrews, especially when it comes to simulators.

With today’s technology, simulators are more important than ever—they allow pilots to train for complicated scenarios without the risk of crashing an actual aircraft.

But the Army is reviewing whether the simulators they’re using are up to the task. After all, when the real world is getting more complex, the training world needs to keep up.

Helicopters Are Changing—So Is the Training

One of the other major shifts we’re seeing is in the helicopters themselves.

The Army is moving forward with its Future Vertical Lift program, which includes developing the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft (FLRAA). This new machine is expected to replace the UH-60 Black Hawk and will be faster, fly farther, and offer more advanced capabilities.

But as exciting as that sounds, it also means training is going to need a serious update.

The Army is going beyond just swapping out old helicopters for new ones. They’re reviewing the entire course of instruction at the Aviation Center of Excellence, where they train their pilots.

From the aircraft they use in training to the defense contracts that supply their simulators, everything is being scrutinized to make sure it fits the needs of today’s Army.

In the past, pilots trained on helicopters like the OH-58 Kiowa Warrior and the TH-67 single-engine helicopter. But those have been replaced with dual-engine LUH-72A Lakotas.

The Army wants to make sure the training keeps pace with the technology—because when the real world is changing fast, training has to change faster.

Warrant Officers: Back to Basics

Another big shift involves warrant officers.

These technical experts often specialize in areas like crew instruction, aircraft maintenance, or survivability.

Recently, though, some junior warrant officers have been pulled into more staff-focused roles, leaving their technical specialties behind. But that’s changing.

The Army wants to keep warrant officers in their specialized roles for longer, focusing on developing deep expertise in areas critical to aviation.

Once they reach the rank of chief warrant officer 5, then they’ll get staff officer training.

But until then, it’s all about sticking to their technical roots. This move aims to create a stronger pool of technical experts who can then bring their knowledge back to operational units.

The Road Ahead: What’s Next for Army Aviation?

So, what does the future hold for Army aviation?

We’re looking at a complete overhaul, from the helicopters themselves to the pilots who fly them.

The Army is in the process of reviewing and updating its entire aviation training system, and changes are expected to start rolling out within the next year. These updates won’t just be about improving safety—they’ll also help ensure that Army pilots are prepared for the complex, high-tech warfare of the future.

One thing’s for sure: the days of simple missions and straightforward airspace are over. The battlefield has changed, and the Army knows it.

The soldiers who fly these helicopters need to be ready for whatever comes their way, whether it’s advanced airborne threats, new mission responsibilities, or just making sure their tail rotor is up to the challenge.

With these overhauls, the Army is taking steps to ensure that its pilots are as prepared and protected as possible, no matter what the future holds.

In the end, it’s not just about fixing a few technical issues or updating some simulators.

It’s about adapting to a new era of air warfare—one where complexity is the norm, and staying ahead of the curve is more important than ever.

—

Disclaimer: SOFREP utilizes AI for image generation and article research. Occasionally, it’s like handing a chimpanzee the keys to your liquor cabinet. It’s not always perfect and if a mistake is made, we own up to it full stop. In a world where information comes at us in tidal waves, it is an important tool that helps us sift through the brass for live rounds.