At its core, military unarmed combat is a system of techniques, strategies, and tactics that allow soldiers to defend themselves and neutralize threats without the aid of their primary weapons. It encompasses defensive and offensive techniques, creating a fascinating balance between them.

Wikimedia Commons

Yet, there’s an ongoing debate in this sphere. What’s the right balance between defensive and offensive maneuvers? Should military training focus more on self-defense or mastering offense techniques? 

These questions might seem complicated, especially if you’re not a seasoned military strategist or a combat sports enthusiast. But, don’t worry, we’re going to break this down in a way that makes sense even for the layman.

Understanding Military Unarmed Combat

Here’s the scenario: You’re arguing with a friend over a board game. Things get out of hand, and suddenly, your friend raises their hand as if to slap you. 

Instinctively, you put up your hand to block the slap, maybe even push your friend away. That’s the essence of unarmed combat: reacting to threats and responding to ensure your safety.

Now, when we take that into the context of a military setting, the stakes are higher, and the techniques more advanced. Rather than just blocking a slap, you might be dodging a knife or disarming an attacker with a  firearm. 

Soldiers train to strike, grapple, and even incapacitate an opponent using their own body weight. It’s not about being the strongest or the fastest; it’s about being clever, efficient, and survival-oriented.

Striking a Balance Between Defense and Offense

Think about driving a car. You can’t just focus on moving forward while on the road. You want to reach your destination, which requires accelerating and overtaking when necessary.